|
|
Post by Mark on Feb 7, 2010 1:25:14 GMT -5
nasty boys dont really have credentials. 3D is an established and ALMOST relevant tag team todya and many fans do still have that connection with them from WWF. Natsy boy? who gives a  j |
|
|
|
Post by Triple S on Feb 7, 2010 1:54:14 GMT -5
The Nasty Boys were a huge tag team in the late 80's - early 90's. In both WWE and WCW. TNA has put Team 3D over almost every tag team in the world, but I don't think they've faced the Nastys yet.
I'm sure Team 3D will go over, in the feud and you'll see the Nastys for another 1-2 months... if that.
- Triple S
|
|
Silent Jay
Main Eventer
Give Scrappy a thread, he'll follow you around the board
Joined on: Nov 27, 2007 2:22:18 GMT -5
Posts: 1,607
|
Post by Silent Jay on Feb 7, 2010 1:56:06 GMT -5
The Nasty Boys were a huge tag team in the late 80's - early 90's. In both WWE and WCW. TNA has put Team 3D over almost every tag team in the world, but I don't think they've faced the Nastys yet. I'm sure Team 3D will go over, in the feud and you'll see the Nastys for another 1-2 months... if that. - Triple S Exactly, it's the same thing did with the short Steiners reunion, giving us two major tag teams that have never met in the ring. If Hawk was still alive I guarantee we would have gotten an LOD/3D dream match in TNA |
|
|
|
Post by legionofsemidoom on Feb 7, 2010 3:13:23 GMT -5
Hogan has more of a point then you do man.
Its his company let him do what he wants, It keeps you watching so he must be doing his job
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 7, 2010 3:17:34 GMT -5
The Nasty Boys were a huge tag team in the late 80's - early 90's. In both WWE and WCW. TNA has put Team 3D over almost every tag team in the world, but I don't think they've faced the Nastys yet. I'm sure Team 3D will go over, in the feud and you'll see the Nastys for another 1-2 months... if that. - Triple S Exactly, it's the same thing did with the short Steiners reunion, giving us two major tag teams that have never met in the ring. If Hawk was still alive I guarantee we would have gotten an LOD/3D dream match in TNA And how does that accomplish anything? |
|
|
|
Post by Triple S on Feb 7, 2010 3:36:36 GMT -5
There are many people that pay money to see two legendary tag teams face off.
- Triple S
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 7, 2010 3:38:54 GMT -5
There are many people that pay money to see two legendary tag teams face off. - Triple S Apparently they don't tune in to see the show though. |
|
|
|
Post by Ldeow on Feb 7, 2010 3:39:45 GMT -5
hogan deserves a years worth of facepalm.
|
|
Silent Jay
Main Eventer
Give Scrappy a thread, he'll follow you around the board
Joined on: Nov 27, 2007 2:22:18 GMT -5
Posts: 1,607
|
Post by Silent Jay on Feb 7, 2010 3:41:53 GMT -5
There are many people that pay money to see two legendary tag teams face off. - Triple S Apparently they don't tune in to see the show though. Yes because TNA getting its highest rating in a while says people are not watching the show. The TNA Forum on here wasn't nearly as active before Hogan came in, like it or not he makes people talk. |
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Feb 7, 2010 3:47:21 GMT -5
Yup. Hulk Hogan does. NOT the Nasty Boys though.  |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 7, 2010 3:49:57 GMT -5
Apparently they don't tune in to see the show though. Yes because TNA getting its highest rating in a while says people are not watching the show. The TNA Forum on here wasn't nearly as active before Hogan came in, like it or not he makes people talk. They just got a 1.2. They've gotten that before. It's not their highest ratings in a while. Please stop your lying. |
|
|
|
Post by Triple S on Feb 7, 2010 3:53:17 GMT -5
Not the highest, but the most consistent.
Plus, this board is MUCH more active. Many people that I only saw on the WWE board of these forums, I now see posting over here.
Hulk Hogan in TNA has made TNA more popular. Whether some people like it, or not.
- Triple S
|
|
Silent Jay
Main Eventer
Give Scrappy a thread, he'll follow you around the board
Joined on: Nov 27, 2007 2:22:18 GMT -5
Posts: 1,607
|
Post by Silent Jay on Feb 7, 2010 3:57:09 GMT -5
Yes because TNA getting its highest rating in a while says people are not watching the show. The TNA Forum on here wasn't nearly as active before Hogan came in, like it or not he makes people talk. They just got a 1.2. They've gotten that before. It's not their highest ratings in a while. Please stop your lying. I didn't say it was there highest ratings EVER I said there highest ratings in a while. Also on Thursday they had to contend with the Lost Season Finale so there ratings dipped a little, it happens. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Feb 7, 2010 3:58:37 GMT -5
Not the highest, but the most consistent. Plus, this board is MUCH more active. Many people that I only saw on the WWE board of these forums, I now see posting over here. Hulk Hogan in TNA has made TNA more popular. Whether some people like it, or not. - Triple S What's consistent about fluctuating each week? They did that before Hogan. WF =/= a boost in popularity for TNA. |
|
|
|
Post by Triple S on Feb 7, 2010 4:17:19 GMT -5
To expect an immediate shoot in the ratings this short, is asinine.
I say wait to see what Hogan does for TNA, in the long run. He's already improved the quality of pay-per-views and iMPACT! I'm curious as to what he could do, if they ever left the iMPACT! Zone.
- Triple S
|
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Feb 7, 2010 5:42:06 GMT -5
Triple S, can we please get an official
"HULK HOGAN DOES NOTHING FOR TNA; TNA ISNT POPULAR; RATINGS DONT MEAN NOTHING UNTIL TNA GETS LOW RATINGS; TNA SUCKS THREAD!"? I think it would be for the best tbh. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Feb 7, 2010 6:19:40 GMT -5
The point of this thread was not to talk bad about TNA, at least not from me. I've rather enjoyed TNA of late sans the orlando screwjob. The point was that Hogan likes to talk alot of shyt like when he talked about bringing in Austin and when he talked about getting a 3.0 rating. He says alot of things that get people riled up, and maybe that's his purpose. I agree, the TNA board's never been this active, so he must be doing something right. But for all that he does right he talks about the wrong stuff...again, maybe that's his plan. Also, I think he should give internet smarks a litle more credit...some of them actually have been in the business.
|
|
|
|
Post by 51 on Feb 7, 2010 6:22:35 GMT -5
To the thread crator, you are an idiot.
Do you have the detailed, segment by segment ratings in front of you?
How do you know the ratings do not go up when Hogan appears?
|
|
Silent Jay
Main Eventer
Give Scrappy a thread, he'll follow you around the board
Joined on: Nov 27, 2007 2:22:18 GMT -5
Posts: 1,607
|
Post by Silent Jay on Feb 7, 2010 6:28:52 GMT -5
The point of this thread was not to talk bad about TNA, at least not from me. I've rather enjoyed TNA of late sans the orlando screwjob. The point was that Hogan likes to talk alot of shyt like when he talked about bringing in Austin and when he talked about getting a 3.0 rating. He says alot of things that get people riled up, and maybe that's his purpose. I agree, the TNA board's never been this active, so he must be doing something right. But for all that he does right he talks about the wrong stuff...again, maybe that's his plan. Also, I think he should give internet smarks a litle more credit...some of them actually have been in the business. I've been in the business for quite a while, yet I don't crap on everything that is done everywhere |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Feb 7, 2010 6:36:43 GMT -5
To the thread crator, you are an idiot. Do you have the detailed, segment by segment ratings in front of you? How do you know the ratings do not go up when Hogan appears? I'm the creator, and no, you're the idiot. So are you suggesting that we have the frakin Hulk hogan show for 2 hours so the ratings stay high all the time? You really think that the ratings for hulk hogan standing around in his office twirling his pencil did higher ratings then the the flair/AJ styles promo? Hogan is basically saying him being on tv is a ratings draw and guys like Hall/AJ or whoever, "jam" the ratings? He's so self absorbed that he believes his own hype and people like you eat it up. No i dont have the ratings in front of me but it makes no sense to look at moment by moment spikes in the ratings...maybe he should look at the overall product, like why viewers taper off in the second hour or why when veiwers get to the main event, the ratings sometimes dip. The rating ae too low and too objective for Hogan or anyone to use that as a basis for your programming. Again, focus more on a product that people want to see week in and week out instead of minute by minute... Hogan: "Hey brothers, the ratings just dipped when Aj styles walked outta the arena so I'm gonna peak my head out behind the curtain so the ratings needle spikes again" Hogan: "Welp the Kurt Angle segment made the ratings go down, when we come back from Commercial, have the cameras on me sitting at my desk looking blankly into space" come on man  |
|
