Deleted
Joined on: May 17, 2024 14:55:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 25, 2010 20:42:36 GMT -5
First time ever on WF that I laughed so hard I cried. It was funny, but not THAT funny This. |
|
zappa2510
Main Eventer
- 45 Refs & Counting -
Joined on: Nov 23, 2008 23:43:39 GMT -5
Posts: 1,471
|
Post by zappa2510 on Mar 25, 2010 23:37:38 GMT -5
*Looks at TNA's product* ...I guess it is 1997.  i like your photo...reminds me of what happened in doctor who the end of time. |
|
kjw
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Jul 14, 2005 14:31:52 GMT -5
Posts: 279
|
Post by kjw on Mar 26, 2010 0:07:26 GMT -5
This is probably why TNA is switching it's time to 8 to 10 pm on the next Impact show.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 17, 2024 14:55:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2010 0:09:37 GMT -5
You guys be quite, TNA is going to beat WWE. Its obviously the better product.........
LMFAO x10
|
|
|
|
Post by j2dacversion3 on Mar 26, 2010 0:31:16 GMT -5
First time ever on WF that I laughed so hard I cried. It was funny, but not THAT funny Shut your  hole. |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Mar 26, 2010 0:35:10 GMT -5
This is probably why TNA is switching it's time to 8 to 10 pm on the next Impact show. Or you know.. maybe so they don't go up against the NCAA finals? No.. it can't be. |
|
|
|
Post by 1992 on Mar 26, 2010 1:43:59 GMT -5
A southern slur when referring to wrestling, what is this 1997? *Looks at TNA's product* ...I guess it is 1997. in' A |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 26, 2010 2:00:31 GMT -5
He's right. It's obviously not what they want, otherwise more people would be watching their show.
|
|
nWo_Sentinel
Superstar
Joined on: Feb 21, 2009 20:38:16 GMT -5
Posts: 538
|
Post by nWo_Sentinel on Mar 26, 2010 2:12:26 GMT -5
He's right. It's obviously not what they want, otherwise more people would be watching their show. Honestly that may not be the case. It MAY be but because of how little time TNA has had to um....make an impact....You can't say they are losing because WWE is a BETTER product....Not yet. If things havent improved in a year for TNA then you're probably right but, I still think it's to early to throw ratings at these two and call the fight. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 26, 2010 2:15:49 GMT -5
He's right. It's obviously not what they want, otherwise more people would be watching their show. Honestly that may not be the case. It MAY be but because of how little time TNA has had to um....make an impact....You can't say they are losing because WWE is a BETTER product....Not yet. If things havent improved in a year for TNA then you're probably right but, I still think it's to early to throw ratings at these two and call the fight. It's not like they were drawing 3's on Thursdays. Obviously people aren't interested in what they are offering. If they were, more people would be watching and the ratings would be higher. I can say they are losing because the WWE is a better product, because it is a better product. |
|
|
|
Post by SodaGuy on Mar 26, 2010 2:20:00 GMT -5
Honestly that may not be the case. It MAY be but because of how little time TNA has had to um....make an impact....You can't say they are losing because WWE is a BETTER product....Not yet. If things havent improved in a year for TNA then you're probably right but, I still think it's to early to throw ratings at these two and call the fight. It's not like they were drawing 3's on Thursdays. Obviously people aren't interested in what they are offering. If they were, more people would be watching and the ratings would be higher. I can say they are losing because the WWE is a better product, because it is a better product. It's the lack of promotion, they're not the multi-billion dollar company that the WWE has just for promotion. It's not got nothing to do with "one being better than the other", it's pure promotion. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Mar 26, 2010 2:27:08 GMT -5
It's not like they were drawing 3's on Thursdays. Obviously people aren't interested in what they are offering. If they were, more people would be watching and the ratings would be higher. I can say they are losing because the WWE is a better product, because it is a better product. It's the lack of promotion, they're not the multi-billion dollar company that the WWE has just for promotion. It's not got nothing to do with "one being better than the other", it's pure promotion. I'm sure Dixie's dad would lend her a few million dollars to do a promotion of the show. Maybe they don't want to succeed. Doesn't seem like they are trying to hard. |
|
|
|
Post by specterkev on Mar 26, 2010 2:47:01 GMT -5
from Dixie's twitter:
To be called tawdry from the King of Tawdry, that is some compliment!!
but yeah TNA needs more advertisement I know alot of WWE fans who do not even know TNA even exhists..
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Mar 26, 2010 2:48:57 GMT -5
I agree with Vince especially regarding the ratings. No one can really dispute that their ratings are crappy. A small fraction of Raw's rating so go back to your original day or get comfortable losing forever.
|
|
|
|
Post by jfinnomore on Mar 26, 2010 3:14:27 GMT -5
It was funny 'cause it's true. and once again we agree, seeing Hogan and Flair bleed isn't making me switch the channel, give me some actually wrestling TNA and we'll talk but seems you've gotten away from that. |
|
|
|
Post by Sam Hain on Mar 26, 2010 8:55:30 GMT -5
Vince's attitude is the reason I hate WWE. He made billions off of the "wrasslin" business by watering it down and creating this bullcrap "sports entertainment" and then makes fun of it.
I personally think TNA has a much better product right now and will eventually find a very strong audience. That being said, he is right about one thing: my 2 year old loves wrestling, but I can't let him watch TNA because of the blood.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Mar 26, 2010 15:31:52 GMT -5
Wait two 60 year old men bleeding is not what people want to see? Who knew?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 17, 2024 14:55:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2010 16:47:24 GMT -5
Im sorry, but Id rather see more from AJ, Daniels, Joe, Angle, Pope, and Wolfe. Watching the NWO in 2010 is not entertaining to me. Watching Abyss as the top face is not entertaining to me. Seeing Daniels and Joe drop down so low does not entertain me. If TNA cared about what people wanted and cared about competing, they wouldnt give us WCW 2.0 dammit. It got old the first time and that why they failed. And sad thing is Im a huge Hulkamaniac.....
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Mar 26, 2010 17:29:14 GMT -5
Vince isn't in the entertainment business, he's in the money business. Which is why he views UFC as a threat, but not TNA.
|
|
|
|
Post by bane on Mar 26, 2010 18:51:21 GMT -5
Yup you kids don't remember Vince has already said this before about WCW. They are in the wrasslin business, Vince is in the entertainment business. He told it personally to Ted Turner back in 91.
|
|
