Tylor
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 23, 2008 18:17:08 GMT -5
Posts: 4,437
|
Post by Tylor on Jun 27, 2010 9:26:24 GMT -5
Just got around to thinking, since there is a Money in the Bank Pay-Per-View Coming up, including a MITB Match, a feud could start very easily. Imagine it, the winner could wait past Wrestlemania, and cash it in right after the WM Winner does, steal it from him, and they go from there. Or Vise-Versa. Thoughts?
|
|
JedsWorld
Main Eventer
45+ Trading refs on classifieds.
Joined on: Apr 20, 2008 8:57:37 GMT -5
Posts: 4,470
|
Post by JedsWorld on Jun 27, 2010 9:30:43 GMT -5
With two Money in the bank matches we are treated to two separate superstars ‘cashing-in’ I like the sound of your idea but how about this, Someone just wins/retains a world title match (Let’s say John Cena) then someone comes down and cashes in their briefcase, winning the title from him (Let’s say Edge) BUT.... then the other money in the bank winner comes down and cashes their briefcase in on them winning the title (Let’s say Christian)
Now that would be AWESOME!!
|
|
Tylor
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 23, 2008 18:17:08 GMT -5
Posts: 4,437
|
Post by Tylor on Jun 27, 2010 9:32:57 GMT -5
With two Money in the bank matches we are treated to two separate superstars ‘cashing-in’ I like the sound of your idea but how about this, Someone just wins/retains a world title match (Let’s say John Cena) then someone comes down and cashes in their briefcase, winning the title from him (Let’s say Edge) BUT.... then the other money in the bank winner comes down and cashes their briefcase in on them winning the title (Let’s say Christian) Now that would be AWESOME!! That's pretty much what I was trying to say.
|
|
JedsWorld
Main Eventer
45+ Trading refs on classifieds.
Joined on: Apr 20, 2008 8:57:37 GMT -5
Posts: 4,470
|
Post by JedsWorld on Jun 27, 2010 9:35:36 GMT -5
With two Money in the bank matches we are treated to two separate superstars ‘cashing-in’ I like the sound of your idea but how about this, Someone just wins/retains a world title match (Let’s say John Cena) then someone comes down and cashes in their briefcase, winning the title from him (Let’s say Edge) BUT.... then the other money in the bank winner comes down and cashes their briefcase in on them winning the title (Let’s say Christian) Now that would be AWESOME!! That's pretty much what I was trying to say. ahh ok, the way you worded it made is sound like you were saying one of the money in the bank winners would steal the championship from whoever wins the main event at Wrestlemania. Great minds think alike.
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Jun 27, 2010 10:16:57 GMT -5
My question is, is there only 2 matches for cases for the World titles, or is there going to be a match for say, The US or I.C belts?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 20, 2024 8:04:56 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 27, 2010 10:27:33 GMT -5
My question is, is there only 2 matches for cases for the World titles, or is there going to be a match for say, The US or I.C belts? No. At MITB, one will only be eligible for the WWE Championship and one for the World Championship. If they have a MITB match at Mania 27, that winner gets a match for either belts.
|
|
|
Post by ß®å¢K$ßâ¢k on Jun 27, 2010 11:04:47 GMT -5
Wait...I thought the winners could only cash it in on their brand if they win at the ppv.
|
|
|
Post by blecaaldwin on Jun 27, 2010 11:08:02 GMT -5
I would prefer one of the champions get "hurt" or something before one of the MITB matches, and they just replace the briefcase with the title the night of the PPV. A 6-8 men World Title ladder match would be very interesting. It would bring a different feel entirely to it. It would be less about the spots and ladders and more about the fact that whomever wins is the new world champion.
|
|
|
Post by Johnny on Jun 27, 2010 11:47:54 GMT -5
What if the guy who wins at the MITB PPV also wins the case at WM27? Depending on who it was, I think that could be very awesome.
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Jun 27, 2010 12:01:43 GMT -5
Why not have one of the MITB winners cash in that night while the other holds it for a longer period of time? I actually wouldn't mind the winner of a briefcase actually cashing it in as the main event of a PPV. So someone who has a character like Wade Barrett wins, and then says I am good enough to beat you in a match. I don't need to wait until you have already gone to the limit with someone else to come out and cash this in because I can beat you. I don't know I think that would make a guy look like a bad ass if he went that route.
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Jun 27, 2010 12:26:13 GMT -5
Don't wanna kill your idea (as I actually really like it) but I could have sworn the winners had to cash in on their brands title?
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jun 27, 2010 13:53:58 GMT -5
In theory it could work, but I think they're right that you can only cash it in on your show. But to quote the dirt sheets, knowing WWE thing could always change.
|
|
|
Post by carly1988 on Jun 27, 2010 14:25:24 GMT -5
I still think what would be completely awesome is say, Chris Jericho wins MITB ppv. Holds on to it and then later wins the Royal Rumble. Jericho goes on a beats say Mysterio at Mania and then Punk (who won MITB at Mania if there is one) comes down and beats Jericho. While celebrating Jericho cashes his in and sneak attacks Punk and wins the title back. Jericho would win the title twice in a night.....would be a waste of MITB, but cool to see.
|
|
|
Post by DMO™ on Jun 27, 2010 17:03:41 GMT -5
I'm pretty sure I heard somewhere that there would be one MITB for each brand, The winner would have cash in on their own brands champion.
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Jun 27, 2010 20:05:16 GMT -5
I heard they were getting rid of the WM MITB b/c of this ppv.
|
|
Alpha Q Up
Main Eventer
Not gravitas
Joined on: Jun 20, 2010 21:48:13 GMT -5
Posts: 2,691
|
Post by Alpha Q Up on Jun 27, 2010 21:44:55 GMT -5
I'd prefer if the winner of RAW's MITB (Hopefully The Miz) cashes it on lets say, Cena if he ends up facing Sheamus at the PPV and beating him, and the winner of Smackdown's MITB (Hopefully Christian) Holds onto it and since he's a face, maybe actually using the MITB for a clean-cut match. Hey, maybe Christian go's heel who knows.
|
|
|
Post by blecaaldwin on Jun 27, 2010 21:47:31 GMT -5
I'd prefer if the winner of RAW's MITB (Hopefully The Miz) cashes it on lets say, Cena if he ends up facing Sheamus at the PPV and beating him, and the winner of Smackdown's MITB (Hopefully Christian) Holds onto it and since he's a face, maybe actually using the MITB for a clean-cut match. Hey, maybe Christian go's heel who knows. He's great as a heel. I wouldn't mind seeing a little heel Christian on Smackdown.
|
|
|
Post by kahnspiricy on Jun 27, 2010 21:50:56 GMT -5
Christian loses much like Benoit did at WM 21 with some injured arm or leg, but the feud goes on for a little longer than Edge and Benoit had. Or just actually wins the match and goes heel, like above.
|
|
Tylor
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 23, 2008 18:17:08 GMT -5
Posts: 4,437
|
Post by Tylor on Jun 28, 2010 7:16:02 GMT -5
I still think what would be completely awesome is say, Chris Jericho wins MITB ppv. Holds on to it and then later wins the Royal Rumble. Jericho goes on a beats say Mysterio at Mania and then Punk (who won MITB at Mania if there is one) comes down and beats Jericho. While celebrating Jericho cashes his in and sneak attacks Punk and wins the title back. Jericho would win the title twice in a night.....would be a waste of MITB, but cool to see. Or, he switches brands for the WM Title Shot, wins it, and cashes in on the other brand thus coming undisputed champion.
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Jun 28, 2010 7:25:22 GMT -5
Id like to see a variation of that tbh
e.g. Cena beats sheamus for the title, MITB winner A cashes in and gets beat by cena (because its cena) then MITB winner B blindsides cena with the breifcase then cashes in and wins
|
|