|
|
Post by dmkp0wer on Jan 22, 2011 17:30:47 GMT -5
Idk what your smoking, but it must be some strong s***
|
|
|
|
Post by The Undertaker on Jan 22, 2011 19:32:44 GMT -5
Coming from you Jimmy that says a lot.  lmfao. And no. The Corre are not the Horsemen and never will even be relatively close. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 18, 2024 16:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2011 19:55:21 GMT -5
......vintage WF! let's compare stables that are nothing alike!
|
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Jan 22, 2011 21:11:23 GMT -5
3. Justin Gabriel is more handsome than any Horsemen ever.  Damn straight. holy crap, too funny |
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Jan 23, 2011 2:19:29 GMT -5
......vintage WF! let's compare stables that are nothing alike! Remember the week and a half on WE when Tyson Kidd and Jackson Andrews were the next HBK and Diesel? Seriously, I'm starting to think that the majority of people who talk about wrestling on the internet just simply can not handle anything new happening without immediately saying it's the new "whatever" and proclaiming that every wrestler who just made his debut should IMMEDIATELY be thrust into the main event because clearly their 8 minutes of in-ring time is cause for putting the title on them. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 18, 2024 16:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2011 2:24:26 GMT -5
......vintage WF! let's compare stables that are nothing alike! Remember the week and a half on WE when Tyson Kidd and Jackson Andrews were the next HBK and Diesel? Seriously, I'm starting to think that the majority of people who talk about wrestling on the internet just simply can not handle anything new happening without immediately saying it's the new "whatever" and proclaiming that every wrestler who just made his debut should IMMEDIATELY be thrust into the main event because clearly their 8 minutes of in-ring time is cause for putting the title on them. Yeah WF is this craps these days. If WWE actually listened to some of the morons on this forum, they would have went out of business years ago. |
|
|
|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Jan 23, 2011 2:27:59 GMT -5
......vintage WF! let's compare stables that are nothing alike! Remember the week and a half on WE when Tyson Kidd and Jackson Andrews were the next HBK and Diesel? Seriously, I'm starting to think that the majority of people who talk about wrestling on the internet just simply can not handle anything new happening without immediately saying it's the new "whatever" and proclaiming that every wrestler who just made his debut should IMMEDIATELY be thrust into the main event because clearly their 8 minutes of in-ring time is cause for putting the title on them. I think only one person compared TyDrews to HBK and Diesel, maybe two. Although the second point is kind of true, and funny at the same time since a major complaint about Wrestling is that it's stale and nothings original, yet when you have something such as Nexus/Corre, which are two groups unlike anything before in terms of who's in it and the way they're presented, it's compared to "[Insert Awesome Group of Yesteryear Here]" Wrestling groups of the present can suck on their own merit, not be a "Second-rate [Insert Awesome Group of Yesteryear Here]." |
|
|
|
Post by Lorenzo Alcazar on Jan 23, 2011 2:33:28 GMT -5
Physical resemblance, using the same move as somebody else, or a group with the same number of guys as a past group doesn't make anybody the next ANYTHING.
I'm all for new guys. I'm all for giving young guys an opportunity. Hell, I wish EVERY rookie made it because the more guys who become stars just means the business is going to have a great future and be really entertaining.
But people need to stop comparing some of the most legendary superstars and groups of the past to people and groups that have been around for 10 minutes.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 18, 2024 16:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2011 2:36:42 GMT -5
Physical resemblance, using the same move as somebody else, or a group with the same number of guys as a past group doesn't make anybody the next ANYTHING. I'm all for new guys. I'm all for giving young guys an opportunity. Hell, I wish EVERY rookie made it because the more guys who become stars just means the business is going to have a great future and be really entertaining. But people need to stop comparing some of the most legendary superstars and groups of the past to people and groups that have been around for 10 minutes. I remember a guy comparing Jack Swagger to Kurt Angle just because of his wrestlemania 26 attire... |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 18, 2024 16:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2011 4:00:52 GMT -5
tg11 is the best troll on WF.
|
|
|
|
Post by Byron F'N Saxton Fan on Jan 23, 2011 4:06:24 GMT -5
Physical resemblance, using the same move as somebody else, or a group with the same number of guys as a past group doesn't make anybody the next ANYTHING. I'm all for new guys. I'm all for giving young guys an opportunity. Hell, I wish EVERY rookie made it because the more guys who become stars just means the business is going to have a great future and be really entertaining. But people need to stop comparing some of the most legendary superstars and groups of the past to people and groups that have been around for 10 minutes. I remember a guy comparing Jack Swagger to Kurt Angle just because of his wrestlemania 26 attire... The Swagger/Angle comparisons are more valid, especially since it's a WWE-influenced comparison, since both are heavy on the American influence on their gimmicks (As well as attires), both are touted as great Amateur Wrestlers and Swagger started using the Angle Lock soon after busting out the aforementioned WM26 Singlet and others of the like. Obviously the points sound very "But, they do that the same!", but kind of like how I can't describe how Undertaker and Sting are similar, Kurt and Swagger are, just to a more defined level. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 18, 2024 16:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2011 4:11:29 GMT -5
Remember the week and a half on WE when Tyson Kidd and Jackson Andrews were the next HBK and Diesel? Seriously, I'm starting to think that the majority of people who talk about wrestling on the internet just simply can not handle anything new happening without immediately saying it's the new "whatever" and proclaiming that every wrestler who just made his debut should IMMEDIATELY be thrust into the main event because clearly their 8 minutes of in-ring time is cause for putting the title on them.
Although the second point is kind of true, and funny at the same time since a major complaint about Wrestling is that it's stale and nothings original, yet when you have something such as Nexus/Corre, which are two groups unlike anything before in terms of who's in it and the way they're presented, it's compared to "[Insert Awesome Group of Yesteryear Here]" Wrestling groups of the present can suck on their own merit, not be a "Second-rate [Insert Awesome Group of Yesteryear Here]." It was only one person, and it was actually tg11. |
|
|
|
Post by juicewinslow on Jan 23, 2011 4:22:22 GMT -5
There will always be comparisons.... in everything with any kind of history.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 18, 2024 16:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2011 6:18:43 GMT -5
You are insane. The Horsemen > The Corre x infinity. couldnt agree the weakest version of the Horsemen are better than these 4. thats not to say that Corre(why is it spelled like that?)wont be a good group but they wont reach 4H levels. |
|
