|
Post by AdamBomb on May 26, 2011 15:36:47 GMT -5
Where can I see this? I've seen plenty of her work, and have never seen her go past the middle rope to my recollection. Even then, most of her matches are comprised of slams, a spinning back hand (typically rather slowly), a corner avalanche, and perhaps submission, and taking someone else's high-spot maneuver. I've always found her, as herself pretty boring in the ring, and much like Evan Bourne is to Sheamus usually, the person getting beaten to death is typically the more entertaining of the two (ring wise). Just my opinion on her. Besides, I like the Bella's just fine. String me up for it, I'm sure someone will because, "OMG DA KONGZ HAS BEN N JAPANS N IS REEL WHILE BELLA WHORES ARE JUST DIVAS." I like who I like, and I have my reasons. Not a fan of Kharma... Kong... whatever. 9:30 ...that... that was it? Really? I'm supposed to impressed by a somersault on to her ass? Really? All I'm saying is, Eve can do a moonsault, and she still sucks.
|
|
|
Post by Chris Hammers on May 26, 2011 15:38:34 GMT -5
...that... that was it? Really? I'm supposed to impressed by a somersault on to her ass? Really? All I'm saying is, Eve can do a moonsault, and she still sucks. You asked for footage, I provided the footage. Everyone has the right to an opinion. I don't agree with your statements on Kong, but I also seem to be in the small minority, like yourself, that don't mind most of the wwe diva's.
|
|
Sky'sTheLimit
Superstar
Divas Defender, NXT Fanatic (formerly BlackWidow)
Joined on: May 12, 2009 11:17:50 GMT -5
Posts: 761
|
Post by Sky'sTheLimit on May 26, 2011 15:55:57 GMT -5
I agree with you Chris! I feel that all of the diva's are talented in some way, it's just most of the forum are very bitchy. Js.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on May 26, 2011 18:01:41 GMT -5
This is why the Women's Division is sh*t, because the majority of people care more about looks than actual wrestling ability. If you want to look at slutty women so badly there are certain magazines and movies that can you can turn to you know. I thought I made myself clear without having to actually say it, I think the broad LACKS WRESTLING ABILITY. Boohoo, I like attractive women. Boohoo, I like seeing them. Boohoo, I like watching pro-wrestling and if I can see attractive women on pro-wrestling I like seeing them too. I'm a guy. I like attractive women. Not really a stretch. So let me get this straight, you think Michelle McCool is a great wrestler but not Kharma?
|
|
|
Post by awesomeallamerican on May 26, 2011 18:02:13 GMT -5
Where can I see this? I've seen plenty of her work, and have never seen her go past the middle rope to my recollection. Even then, most of her matches are comprised of slams, a spinning back hand (typically rather slowly), a corner avalanche, and perhaps submission, and taking someone else's high-spot maneuver. I've always found her, as herself pretty boring in the ring, and much like Evan Bourne is to Sheamus usually, the person getting beaten to death is typically the more entertaining of the two (ring wise). Just my opinion on her. Besides, I like the Bella's just fine. String me up for it, I'm sure someone will because, "OMG DA KONGZ HAS BEN N JAPANS N IS REEL WHILE BELLA WHORES ARE JUST DIVAS." I like who I like, and I have my reasons. Not a fan of Kharma... Kong... whatever. This is why the Women's Division is sh*t, because the majority of people care more about looks than actual wrestling ability. If you want to look at slutty women so badly there are certain magazines and movies that can you can turn to you know. So just because the Bellas are hot, they're automatically slutty? That's an interesting spin on things. I'll take the hot, "slutty" Bellas over Kharma any day.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on May 26, 2011 18:26:03 GMT -5
This is why the Women's Division is sh*t, because the majority of people care more about looks than actual wrestling ability. If you want to look at slutty women so badly there are certain magazines and movies that can you can turn to you know. So just because the Bellas are hot, they're automatically slutty? That's an interesting spin on things. I'll take the hot, "slutty" Bellas over Kharma any day. Of course you would. Again, it's because of people like you that the Women's Division is so terrible these days. When it comes to wrestling, I'll take any woman with ability over looks. Outside of wrestling, it's different.
|
|
|
Post by awesomeallamerican on May 26, 2011 18:58:06 GMT -5
So just because the Bellas are hot, they're automatically slutty? That's an interesting spin on things. I'll take the hot, "slutty" Bellas over Kharma any day. Of course you would. Again, it's because of people like you that the Women's Division is so terrible these days. When it comes to wrestling, I'll take any woman with ability over looks. Outside of wrestling, it's different. You failed to address the fact that you called the Bellas slutty without having any knowledge of their sexual ventures. While you're trying to act like the noble one here, you simply come off as the shallow one when you make those kind of assumptions. By the way, there's a reason why the WWE puts beautiful women in positions to succeed. It's because it sells. I would venture to guess that the Divas division would be even less popular if it had a bunch of 270 lb. animals running around. We get plenty of that from the men's division.
|
|
|
Post by Scotty on May 26, 2011 19:38:17 GMT -5
ahh congrats I guess
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on May 26, 2011 19:57:51 GMT -5
Of course you would. Again, it's because of people like you that the Women's Division is so terrible these days. When it comes to wrestling, I'll take any woman with ability over looks. Outside of wrestling, it's different. You failed to address the fact that you called the Bellas slutty without having any knowledge of their sexual ventures. While you're trying to act like the noble one here, you simply come off as the shallow one when you make those kind of assumptions. By the way, there's a reason why the WWE puts beautiful women in positions to succeed. It's because it sells. I would venture to guess that the Divas division would be even less popular if it had a bunch of 270 lb. animals running around. We get plenty of that from the men's division. I didn't address it because I was never specific with who I was calling slutty. But they are known as the Bella Whores, so I'm sure there's a reason behind it. I don't know if they are, and you don't know if they aren't so there's no point in arguing.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on May 26, 2011 20:20:01 GMT -5
I thought I made myself clear without having to actually say it, I think the broad LACKS WRESTLING ABILITY. Boohoo, I like attractive women. Boohoo, I like seeing them. Boohoo, I like watching pro-wrestling and if I can see attractive women on pro-wrestling I like seeing them too. I'm a guy. I like attractive women. Not really a stretch. So let me get this straight, you think Michelle McCool is a great wrestler but not Kharma? Yeah I don't understand that. I love both of them!
|
|
|
Post by awesomeallamerican on May 26, 2011 23:03:09 GMT -5
You failed to address the fact that you called the Bellas slutty without having any knowledge of their sexual ventures. While you're trying to act like the noble one here, you simply come off as the shallow one when you make those kind of assumptions. By the way, there's a reason why the WWE puts beautiful women in positions to succeed. It's because it sells. I would venture to guess that the Divas division would be even less popular if it had a bunch of 270 lb. animals running around. We get plenty of that from the men's division. I didn't address it because I was never specific with who I was calling slutty. But they are known as the Bella Whores, so I'm sure there's a reason behind it. I don't know if they are, and you don't know if they aren't so there's no point in arguing. Lol okay, it's obvious who you were calling slutty. The reason some people call them "The Bella Whores" is because of their gimmick where they would be all over the RAW guest host. You do know that's not real, right?
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on May 26, 2011 23:52:21 GMT -5
I thought I made myself clear without having to actually say it, I think the broad LACKS WRESTLING ABILITY. Boohoo, I like attractive women. Boohoo, I like seeing them. Boohoo, I like watching pro-wrestling and if I can see attractive women on pro-wrestling I like seeing them too. I'm a guy. I like attractive women. Not really a stretch. So let me get this straight, you think Michelle McCool is a great wrestler but not Kharma? Um, in a word, duh. Rather than refute my opinion, you post a .gif? That's the best you have?
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on May 27, 2011 0:29:39 GMT -5
I didn't address it because I was never specific with who I was calling slutty. But they are known as the Bella Whores, so I'm sure there's a reason behind it. I don't know if they are, and you don't know if they aren't so there's no point in arguing. Lol okay, it's obvious who you were calling slutty. The reason some people call them "The Bella Whores" is because of their gimmick where they would be all over the RAW guest host. You do know that's not real, right? How do you know it isn't? So let me get this straight, you think Michelle McCool is a great wrestler but not Kharma? Um, in a word, duh. Rather than refute my opinion, you post a .gif? That's the best you have? Well what else can I say? If you'd rather watch dumb bimbos with little to no charisma over women that may not be the most attractive but have great ring work, that's all you. I just don't see why you can't look elsewhere for beautiful attractive women that are great to look at but don't belong anywhere near a wrestling ring.
|
|
eddie eddie
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 17, 2009 17:54:26 GMT -5
Posts: 2,873
|
Post by eddie eddie on May 27, 2011 1:22:13 GMT -5
I don't know what the argument is about right now, but I'd just like to say this. Kharma is the best female wrestler in the WWE atm. now, at first, she may seem one-dimensional. she especially will seem one dimensional within WWE's booking of her so far. she just comes in and dominates. given the right opponent, she will have a tremendous match within the idea of shes the monster and they're fighting her off but they're just getting squashed. thing is, she is also capable of putting on a wonderful match against another diva who is booked and put in a position to put up a fight against e.g. Gail Kim and hopefully someday like Beth Phoenix or Natayla.
divas like The Bella Twins, Eve and Kelly Kelly or whoever suck. they're not wrestlers. I wish they would be. they're eye-candy and a poor excuse for a women's division. they define one dimensional. they put on crapty matches night after night.
and if you prefer divas like The Bella Twins because they look better than Kong, well, you're silly. why would you possibly sit through a wrestling match of their standard for their good looks? watch porn, get a girlfriend. I don't care how attractive my womens wrestlers are because they are womens wrestlers.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 14, 2024 21:45:18 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2011 7:45:39 GMT -5
I can't see her being back anytime soon to be honest, Wrestling isn't like a 9 till 5 job where you can put your kid in a nursery even when the kid does get older, Maybe an occasional appearance but on a full time travel schedule for a new mother can't be much of a life.
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on May 27, 2011 7:57:49 GMT -5
Well what else can I say? If you'd rather watch dumb bimbos with little to no charisma over women that may not be the most attractive but have great ring work, that's all you. I just don't see why you can't look elsewhere for beautiful attractive women that are great to look at but don't belong anywhere near a wrestling ring. Again, I have yet to see this "great ring work" of Kharma's. Even in TNA, any time she was in the ring with Taylor Wilde or Gail, it wasn't Kong (then) that I thought shined the most. It was always the opponent. You make it out like she's ing Sara Del Rey in the ring, but she isn't. Would I like to see HER in the WWE? yes I would, if the WWE could hire ONE person right now, I'd like for it to be her, or Daffney. However, given what I have to watch on my TV, I'd rather see two attractive women in the ring who may only be sub-par, than see a woman that isn't attractive at all that I find boring as sin.
|
|
|
Post by Ace Bennett on May 27, 2011 9:57:01 GMT -5
The Divas in the WWE aren't there to wrestle. They are there to look good and provide a break from the more intense storylines and wrestling. If you want good women's wrestling, watch SHIMMER. The Divas are simply there to look good, take pictures, and look good.
Is Kong a good wrestler? Sure. Do I think the WWE will keep her around after this? Probably not. Even before the pregnancy, I was honestly expecting a Vladamir Kozlov treatment, huge push at first and then regulated to the bottom of the card and not used at all. She just doesn't have the look WWE likes in their female workers.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on May 27, 2011 13:17:21 GMT -5
I don't know what the argument is about right now, but I'd just like to say this. Kharma is the best female wrestler in the WWE atm. now, at first, she may seem one-dimensional. she especially will seem one dimensional within WWE's booking of her so far. she just comes in and dominates. given the right opponent, she will have a tremendous match within the idea of shes the monster and they're fighting her off but they're just getting squashed. thing is, she is also capable of putting on a wonderful match against another diva who is booked and put in a position to put up a fight against e.g. Gail Kim and hopefully someday like Beth Phoenix or Natayla. divas like The Bella Twins, Eve and Kelly Kelly or whoever suck. they're not wrestlers. I wish they would be. they're eye-candy and a poor excuse for a women's division. they define one dimensional. they put on poopty matches night after night. and if you prefer divas like The Bella Twins because they look better than Kong, well, you're silly. why would you possibly sit through a wrestling match of their standard for their good looks? watch porn, get a girlfriend. I don't care how attractive my womens wrestlers are because they are womens wrestlers.
|
|
|
Post by wabarrett on May 27, 2011 14:07:37 GMT -5
Oh shut the hell up, AB has stated his opinion and now you're basically saying 'Okay, but your opinion is wrong and here's why'.
He's said it countless times, and I agree with him; There's nothing appealing about a huge, slow, lumbering, scary-looking black woman who takes 2 minutes to get to the ring and is being used solely to dominate every other diva in the division.
Sorry cobra but just cause other divas aren't (in your opinion) as good in the ring as Kharma doesn't mean it's silly for AB to like them more. You like Wade Barrett, he's your favourite superstar... is he the best wrestler? Not by a long shot. Maybe you should like more able wrestlers more than him.
|
|
|
Post by AdamBomb on May 27, 2011 14:16:27 GMT -5
Oh shut the hell up, AB has stated his opinion and now you're basically saying 'Okay, but your opinion is wrong and here's why'. He's said it countless times, and I agree with him; There's nothing appealing about a huge, slow, lumbering, scary-looking black woman who takes 2 minutes to get to the ring and is being used solely to dominate every other diva in the division. Sorry cobra but just cause other divas aren't (in your opinion) as good in the ring as Kharma doesn't mean it's silly for AB to like them more. You like Wade Barrett, he's your favourite superstar... is he the best wrestler? Not by a long shot. Maybe you should like more able wrestlers more than him. I do find it funny, he is on me for liking the Bella's who says have no business being near a ring and "can't wrestle" - yet he was upset Aloisa never debuted, who was known to be greener than grass, and completely horrible in the ring.
|
|