Deleted
Joined on: Apr 20, 2024 2:13:00 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 25, 2011 7:47:07 GMT -5
so DC was trying to come up with an excuse to restart all of there comic series. I think that was fine although one of their excuses was to get more readers preferably younger kids. However it was meant for children what about Red Hood and Cat Woman because in Red Hood star fire requests to have sex Red arrow "because she can" and Cat Woman and Batman just plain have sex the last 2 pages of the comic. so are there opinions on this?
|
|
jlavaia
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 25, 2007 20:27:47 GMT -5
Posts: 1,310
|
Post by jlavaia on Sept 25, 2011 10:22:54 GMT -5
well since nobody is actually shown having sex its really not a big deal. i mean Catwoman and Batman were fully clothed. sex is implied in those issues, as it is in many comics. so yeah, its really not an issue. Catwoman had a kid pre-Flashpoint, she's been drawn with less clothes, and the sex is alot more than implied in her last series. and DC never said they made their comics for children. they said they'd like to be able to appeal to a younger audience and new readers. they already have a line of comics for children, Batman: BATB, Young Justice, etc.
but i dont get what loophole you are talking about? i think you're alittle confused on what a loophole is.
|
|
threehgame
Main Eventer
Beyond Bored By You and Your Wrestling
Joined on: Sept 22, 2008 19:09:45 GMT -5
Posts: 2,399
|
Post by threehgame on Sept 25, 2011 21:25:48 GMT -5
First off, no matter what DC says they know little kids will never be into comics. The main attempt with the new 52 was to bring back old readers, and to see if their is a market for digital comics.
Secondly I never saw a nipple, a penis or any penetration so I wouldn't say there was any "sex" in the comics.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ragnarok on Sept 26, 2011 2:04:43 GMT -5
How would that be considered a "loophole"?
|
|
|
|
Post by bigjay on Oct 25, 2011 11:58:15 GMT -5
ya i dont see the loophole aspect
|
|
|
|
Post by triplehisgod on Oct 29, 2011 19:59:50 GMT -5
i dont get it..
|
|
