REAL REVY
Main Eventer
1000 Posts
Joined on: Feb 8, 2012 16:27:26 GMT -5
Posts: 1,000
|
Post by REAL REVY on Jul 7, 2012 23:01:25 GMT -5
I always thought the WWE (formally WWF) was better when it was called the WWF. To me WWE sounds like a PG show that a kid would watch but the WWF sounds like a real sport that men would watch. It was always better as WWF and they never should have changed the name to WWE but I guess that's what Vinne O' Mac wants and that's what Vinnie O' Mac gets. I think Vince tries to overextend himself to far into other categories when he should just stick to what he knows. Please discussion guys and keep it friendly.
What do you guys think and feel?
|
|
|
|
Post by Planktung on Jul 7, 2012 23:05:44 GMT -5
Because the name of the organization actually has an impact on the product?
|
|
|
|
Post by done on Jul 7, 2012 23:11:08 GMT -5
Because it Federation sounds better than Entertainment, plus if it was WWF, we would have better classic DVD's.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 8:38:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2012 23:15:05 GMT -5
When it was WWF, the product sucked sometimes like it did at times with WWE. I just want a good product, I don't care if it's called WWE or WWF.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 8:38:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2012 23:23:30 GMT -5
No. The name of the company doesn't determine the quality of the product. WWF had down periods just like WWE has. I will never understand this website's infatuation with the attitude era and everything about it. Annoys the hell out of me.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Clayton of the MidWest on Jul 7, 2012 23:28:46 GMT -5
I'm torn on this one...
|
|
|
|
Post by jm556 on Jul 7, 2012 23:29:21 GMT -5
No. The name of the company doesn't determine the quality of the product. WWF had down periods just like WWE has. I will never understand this website's infatuation with the attitude era and everything about it. Annoys the hell out of me. Same here. The attitude era was great but times have changed. Vince doesn't want anything to do with the attitude era right now. I guess it's because of the nostalgia that people want it back. |
|
|
|
Post by ebilbryan™ on Jul 7, 2012 23:39:10 GMT -5
It was always better as WWF and they never should have changed the name to WWE but I guess that's what Vinne O' Mac wants and that's what Vinnie O' Mac gets. You do realize that the name change to WWE was a result of a lawsuit, right?  |
|
|
|
Post by Rule 30 on Jul 7, 2012 23:39:24 GMT -5
'It was always better as WWF and they never should have changed the name to WWE but I guess that's what Vinne O' Mac wants and that's what Vinnie O' Mac gets.'
You do realize why they had to change the name, right?
Anyways the name has no impact on the product.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Jul 7, 2012 23:50:59 GMT -5
I don't think the name affects anything really.
If it was still WWF I would expect the product to be the same as it is now.
|
|
|
|
Post by jaymieandrogyny on Jul 7, 2012 23:55:11 GMT -5
Undertaker was better when he had longer hair and Domino's Pizza tasted a lot better when they had The Noid.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Jul 7, 2012 23:58:26 GMT -5
Maybe if it were named WWF, the "E" part wouldn't be taken AS seriously.
Then again, I doubt it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Johnny Wrestling on Jul 8, 2012 3:05:07 GMT -5
I don't think the name affects anything really. If it was still WWF I would expect the product to be the same as it is now. DVDs |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 8:38:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2012 3:47:10 GMT -5
Yes. Fans would suddenly love John Cena if it was called WWF.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 8:38:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2012 4:10:26 GMT -5
It was better when it was called the WWF, but it wouldn't change the direction of the product.
|
|
|
|
Post by emmaobrien1 on Jul 8, 2012 5:07:48 GMT -5
I like the way you think.
|
|
|
|
Post by thebossbaker on Jul 8, 2012 6:00:31 GMT -5
you can call a pile of crap jimmy, but it's still gonna be a pile of crap.
|
|
MonsoonMan
Main Eventer
BITW 24/7-365. even leap years.
Joined on: Jan 1, 2012 22:47:05 GMT -5
Posts: 2,209
|
Post by MonsoonMan on Jul 8, 2012 7:44:35 GMT -5
No. The name of the company doesn't determine the quality of the product. WWF had down periods just like WWE has. I will never understand this website's infatuation with the attitude era and everything about it. Annoys the hell out of me. i would assume thats because alot of the members on this forum grew up in the attitude era. those childhood memories of the product sure seem alot better than what we are seeing today. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 5, 2024 8:38:23 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2012 8:15:46 GMT -5
Yes. Fans would suddenly love John Cena if it was called WWF. I KNEW IT!!! |
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jul 8, 2012 10:32:36 GMT -5
Yeah.... No!
|
|
