Title belts: Dull painted, or Shiny?

depends on the belt. The WHC for example looks way better in dull form. But the Big Eagle looks horrible dull and unpainted.
I voted for dull painted

Shiny without a doubt.

Shiny

Shiny. I have one of each belt (two tag) in shiny form.

I.still prefer the shiny belts

Im more concerned about the figures being accurate more than the titles but shiny looks better for sure

i voted for dull, painted but it all depends on what the belt is

It depends on the belt like everyone else is saying, but I have noticed this, the shiny belts have been prone to being chipped before I even get them out of the box. This has happened to at least 5 or 6 of the belts I have, the most recent being the E16 Diesel I picked up. There is a chip of Gold missing, with dull silver showing from underneath.

I suppose this question would also hold bearing on who plays, who displays, and who collects MOC. The chipping could affect anyone, and the vac belts losing their luster would affect people who display loose and have dust prone homes, or people who play and handle them often. I agree that the color of the painted dull belts makes a difference. I like the color of the plate, for instance, on Eddie Guerrero's Undisputed belt and Ezekiel Jackson's IC title. It looks decent on the dull WHC, and makes the details much easier to see. The only dull painted one I hate is the WWE Championship. That's an awful dolor of Gold. If they had made it like Zeke's IC I'd be okay with it.

The unpainted dull belts that come in those target packs would be great for play and good for kids, but the color they're cast in look like Werther's candy. And the dull Diva title looks like a piece of Laffy Taffy.