|
|
Post by tg11 on Dec 6, 2012 12:02:15 GMT -5
If anything out of these pay per views that WWE have taken away, which one would you like to see be brought back?
Me personally I would love to see Breaking Point come back once again because it was such a great pay per view because of the fact that it was submissions only but also had factors like an I Quit Match also
|
|
|
|
Post by Zeke on Dec 6, 2012 12:07:12 GMT -5
I loved the concept of Bragging Rights, however there isn't brands any more.
|
|
|
|
Post by sean™ on Dec 6, 2012 12:17:45 GMT -5
Vengeance. Just seems like a very appropriate name for a PPV.
|
|
|
|
Post by done on Dec 6, 2012 12:17:45 GMT -5
Bragging Rights - or at least have Survivor Series have a trophy involved!
|
|
|
|
Post by tg11 on Dec 6, 2012 12:19:15 GMT -5
Bragging Rights - or at least have Survivor Series have a trophy involved! Yes I can agree with that, with it being brand vs brand but instead of it being 7 on 7, it should be a traditional Survivor Series match but with it being 5 on 5, 5 superstars representing RAW and 5 superstars representing Smackdown |
|
|
|
Post by RSCTom on Dec 6, 2012 12:32:37 GMT -5
The brand vs. brand was the stupidest and most self-involved attempt at making it seem like there's some sort of competition ever. I'm glad it's over and I hope it never comes back unless there's some sort of WCW revival or something.
I think the question should be and has been for a while, what should they get rid of? I miss MitB as a WrestleMania tradition. It's a shame that it isn't anymore. One briefcase being cashed in on either belt is way more exciting.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Undertaker on Dec 6, 2012 12:39:39 GMT -5
King of the Ring.
|
|
|
|
Post by tg11 on Dec 6, 2012 13:01:08 GMT -5
Yes King of the Ring as a pay per view was definitely awesome and they definitely should bring it back for next year in 2013 but as a PPV concept
|
|
|
|
Post by Escape The Rules on Dec 6, 2012 13:04:01 GMT -5
I'm baffled at the Bragging Rights love, the SD Vs. raw rivarly stopped meaning anything before Bragging Rights even existed.
I liked when they had the final PPV of the year as Armageddon, it just fitted.
|
|
squareshield
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Feb 24, 2012 11:55:56 GMT -5
Posts: 147
|
Post by squareshield on Dec 6, 2012 13:04:12 GMT -5
I voted for Capitol punishment purely because I live in DC
|
|
|
|
Post by tg11 on Dec 6, 2012 13:10:02 GMT -5
Plus Armageddon was such a great PPV because of the fact that it was not only at the end of the year but with the feuds coming into that PPV were so personal and Armageddon was perfect in terms of settling feuds too once and for all
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Dec 6, 2012 13:32:58 GMT -5
I miss King of the Ring. If there's not a concept to the pay-per-view, it's just a name. Doesn't really matter what it's called.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 2, 2024 0:17:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2012 13:34:50 GMT -5
Yep, going to be one of those King of the Ring people.
|
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Dec 6, 2012 13:36:01 GMT -5
I'm baffled at the Bragging Rights love, the SD Vs. raw rivarly stopped meaning anything before Bragging Rights even existed. I liked when they had the final PPV of the year as Armageddon, it just fitted. This. Don't know why. Maybe the whole "The end is here" theme. |
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Dec 6, 2012 13:40:01 GMT -5
I miss King of the Ring. If there's not a concept to the pay-per-view, it's just a name. Doesn't really matter what it's called. Doesn't that go against everything people complain about regarding today's PPV's. Royal Rumble, TLC, Elimination Chamber, Hell in a Cell, Money in the Bank. They all have concepts, so the name shouldn't matter? |
|
tripleh23
Superstar
Joined on: Aug 9, 2006 14:57:03 GMT -5
Posts: 786
|
Post by tripleh23 on Dec 6, 2012 13:48:09 GMT -5
I voted for armageddon but I'd love to see King of the ring return. I also wish elimination chamber was still called no way out, but I can live with that one. But armageddon is still number one for me. It was just so fitting and always had really cool stages.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Dec 6, 2012 14:14:50 GMT -5
|
|
jacktunney
Superstar
Joined on: Jan 3, 2012 22:50:33 GMT -5
Posts: 729
|
Post by jacktunney on Dec 6, 2012 14:21:20 GMT -5
They should get rid of about 8 of them
|
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Dec 6, 2012 14:22:47 GMT -5
Yep, going to be one of those King of the Ring people. this. i also feel the wwe should reduce the amount of ppvs. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Jun 2, 2024 0:17:57 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 6, 2012 14:50:30 GMT -5
fatal four way
|
|
