|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Jun 19, 2013 12:05:05 GMT -5
So last night I called Chad Patton out for count while Randy Orton and Daniel Bryan were fighting outside the ring. And I said something along the lines of "Why does Sheamus count to ten when doing his chest smash thing, but the refs only get to 4." and he told me, "Half of us can't even count to ten." and then I said something about TNA, and then John Cone got involved. This is a transcript of the rest of the conversation. @andrewoloc: @chadpattonwwe let's face it, @babyhebner and @brianstiffler are the only refs who know what they're doing. & they're at the better company. @wwerefjohncone: @andrewoloc @chadpattonwwe Better show? I bet anything that Hebner and Stiffler would jump ship in a second if they had a chance! @wwerefjohncone: @andrewoloc @chadpattonwwe This is the big leagues! @andrewoloc: @wwerefjohncone @chadpattonwwe haha. Awe that's cute. You're trying to take jabs at @impactwrestling... That's like Disney taking on AMC. @andrewoloc: @wwerefjohncone @chadpattonwwe the big leagues don't base everything they have around one SPORTS ENTERTAINER. @andrewoloc: @wwerefjohncone @chadpattonwwe the big leagues have many WRESTLERS that all do many things for the WRESTLING company @wwerefjohncone: @andrewoloc @chadpattonwwe I'm not taking jabs at anybody. Anyone in THIS business wants to work for THIS company. @andrewoloc: @wwerefjohncone @chadpattonwwe Jeff doesn't. Hulk doesn't. Roode doesn't. Aries doesn't. Storm doesn't. Kaz doesn't. Angle doesn't. @wwerefjohncone: @andrewoloc @chadpattonwwe I know personally, that 3 of those guys are in contact with this company now. and then he deleted that tweet and replaced it with: @wwerefjohncone: @andrewoloc @chadpattonwwe If it makes you feel better, Keep telling yourself that! Luckily, I have a basic crap phone, and I have it hooked up to my twitter, so while it's not on twitter anymore, it's in my phone!  Spread the word. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 21, 2024 23:47:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2013 12:21:59 GMT -5
I doubt it means anything but cool I guess.
|
|
RollinsFan44
Main Eventer
12 UK Classifieds Refs.
Joined on: Feb 27, 2013 13:05:53 GMT -5
Posts: 4,160
|
Post by RollinsFan44 on Jun 19, 2013 12:22:02 GMT -5
He probably means Aries, Storm and Roode. Doubt it Jeff and Hulk are working with WWE.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Jun 19, 2013 12:26:01 GMT -5
He's probably just talking out his ass because I "won" the "argument".
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 21, 2024 23:47:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2013 12:29:29 GMT -5
Angle, Hardy,  |
|
|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Jun 19, 2013 12:33:22 GMT -5
No one is. It's illegal to talk with another company if you're under contract with another. You have to wait till your contract is over.
|
|
|
|
Post by OverTheEdge on Jun 19, 2013 12:39:44 GMT -5
You won the argument? The match was a No Disqualification match, not a No Countout match. That's why that was a completely different choice. So you were wrong to begin with, and the only thing you won at was coming across as a complete TNA ass-kisser. Also, I like how you say, "Awe that's cute. You're trying to take jabs at @impactwrestling" directly after taking a jab at WWE.
That aside, just because someone may be in contact with the company doesn't necessarily mean they're coming to it--and that's if any of that is even true.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Jun 19, 2013 12:44:26 GMT -5
You won the argument? The match was a No Disqualification match, not a No Countout match. That's why that was a completely different choice. So you were wrong to begin with, and the only thing you won at was coming across as a complete TNA ass-kisser. Also, I like how you say, "Awe that's cute. You're trying to take jabs at @impactwrestling" directly after taking a jab at WWE. That aside, just because someone may be in contact with the company doesn't necessarily mean they're coming to it--and that's if any of that is even true. In a NO DQ match, you can't get DQ'ed. Getting counted out means you're disqualified. It was a different choice because in a No Count Out match, you can't use weapons. And if you read the whole tweet about "taking jabs" I said it was like Disney taking jabs at AMC. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 21, 2024 23:47:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 19, 2013 12:49:18 GMT -5
I'd like to see Roode, Angle and Jeff in WWE.
Hulk should make part time appearances too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Jun 19, 2013 12:50:20 GMT -5
Why did you argue with him about what company was better anyway? Just because you believe TNA is the better company doesn't mean it is, that's your opinion. He was just defending his company, and he does have a point, almost every wrestler aims to make it to the WWE at some point in there career. Doesn't matter if you listed people who have said in the past that they have no intention of going there doesn't mean that they won't ever go there, just means they are loyal to the company they are currently competing for. RVD said in the past that he was happy at TNA and said he doesn't see himself returning to the WWE, and now look, he is returning next month. Just because you gather "facts" from the internet doesn't make you "win" an argument that was pointless to begin with.
|
|
|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Jun 19, 2013 13:01:54 GMT -5
Why did you argue with him about what company was better anyway? Just because you believe TNA is the better company doesn't mean it is, that's your opinion. He was just defending his company, and he does have a point, almost every wrestler aims to make it to the WWE at some point in there career. Doesn't matter if you listed people who have said in the past that they have no intention of going there doesn't mean that they won't ever go there, just means they are loyal to the company they are currently competing for. RVD said in the past that he was happy at TNA and said he doesn't see himself returning to the WWE, and now look, he is returning next month. Just because you gather "facts" from the internet doesn't make you "win" an argument that was pointless to begin with. RVD said he doesn't wanna work a full time schedule with WWE. He has a part time contract. He was happy with TNA. And he still would be if WWE didnt' call him begging him to come back and empty their wallets for him. And yes, the TNA roster may have wanted to go to WWE when they were kids, BEFORE TNA WAS EVEN THOUGHT OF. But they guys who are TNA originals aren't going anywhere. |
|
|
|
Post by wyleecyotee on Jun 19, 2013 13:15:57 GMT -5
I would assume WWE would always have a scout or two watching TNA an I'm sure most of th wrestlers there have friends or people they talk to in WWE a lot. I would also think WWE would be monitoring the contract situation from the other company and like RVD if its a good choice then there gunna sign them up. No one can argue that WWE isn't the pinnacle as far as wrestling promotions go today.
Also I still don't understand how people don't understand a count out isn't a DQ, does no one else here "no DQ AND no count out" when that type of match is announced, there different and it wa only a no DQ match. It's really simple yet apparently not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Triple S on Jun 19, 2013 13:18:25 GMT -5
Shocker. New member comes in, claims he knows everything and gets angry and defensive when someone disagrees with him...
|
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Jun 19, 2013 13:19:43 GMT -5
Why did you argue with him about what company was better anyway? Just because you believe TNA is the better company doesn't mean it is, that's your opinion. He was just defending his company, and he does have a point, almost every wrestler aims to make it to the WWE at some point in there career. Doesn't matter if you listed people who have said in the past that they have no intention of going there doesn't mean that they won't ever go there, just means they are loyal to the company they are currently competing for. RVD said in the past that he was happy at TNA and said he doesn't see himself returning to the WWE, and now look, he is returning next month. Just because you gather "facts" from the internet doesn't make you "win" an argument that was pointless to begin with. RVD said he doesn't wanna work a full time schedule with WWE. He has a part time contract. He was happy with TNA. And he still would be if WWE didnt' call him begging him to come back and empty their wallets for him. And yes, the TNA roster may have wanted to go to WWE when they were kids, BEFORE TNA WAS EVEN THOUGHT OF. But they guys who are TNA originals aren't going anywhere. It depends were they want to be, guys like AJ Styles will be TNA until he retires as I can't see him in WWE, whereas Roode, Aries and Storm are guys I can see going to WWE at some point in the future. Again, you are going to make another pointless argument because you have read some "facts" on the internet and believe because that was reported or said by that wrestler in the past, they would stick to that statement. |
|
|
|
Post by Manning Of Steel on Jun 19, 2013 13:19:44 GMT -5
You won the argument? The match was a No Disqualification match, not a No Countout match. That's why that was a completely different choice. So you were wrong to begin with, and the only thing you won at was coming across as a complete TNA ass-kisser. Also, I like how you say, "Awe that's cute. You're trying to take jabs at @impactwrestling" directly after taking a jab at WWE. That aside, just because someone may be in contact with the company doesn't necessarily mean they're coming to it--and that's if any of that is even true. In a NO DQ match, you can't get DQ'ed. Getting counted out means you're disqualified. It was a different choice because in a No Count Out match, you can't use weapons. And if you read the whole tweet about "taking jabs" I said it was like Disney taking jabs at AMC. Ummm no. Getting counted out is getting counted out. Hence why a Champion cannot lose his title via Disqualification OR getting counted out. They are two completely separate things. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Jun 19, 2013 13:22:47 GMT -5
RVD said he doesn't wanna work a full time schedule with WWE. He has a part time contract. He was happy with TNA. And he still would be if WWE didnt' call him begging him to come back and empty their wallets for him. And yes, the TNA roster may have wanted to go to WWE when they were kids, BEFORE TNA WAS EVEN THOUGHT OF. But they guys who are TNA originals aren't going anywhere. It depends were they want to be, guys like AJ Styles will be TNA until he retires as I can't see him in WWE, whereas Roode, Aries and Storm are guys I can see going to WWE at some point in the future. Again, you are going to make another pointless argument because you have read some "facts" on the internet and believe because that was reported or said by that wrestler in the past, they would stick to that statement. When did I say anything about anything being reported on what a wrestler said? No you're making things up because you're argument is invalid. |
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Jun 19, 2013 13:29:24 GMT -5
It depends were they want to be, guys like AJ Styles will be TNA until he retires as I can't see him in WWE, whereas Roode, Aries and Storm are guys I can see going to WWE at some point in the future. Again, you are going to make another pointless argument because you have read some "facts" on the internet and believe because that was reported or said by that wrestler in the past, they would stick to that statement. When did I say anything about anything being reported on what a wrestler said? No you're making things up because you're argument is invalid. Let me refresh your memory with a tweet you shared with us in this thread that you posted: So yeah, you did mention about certain wrestlers that you have stated that they have no intention of ever going back or going to WWE, like I said, just because they may have stated that in the past that you have read up on to know that in order to tweet that to John Cone, doesn't mean they will stick with that statement. |
|
|
|
Post by Charlie f'n Kelly on Jun 19, 2013 13:46:14 GMT -5
When did I say anything about anything being reported on what a wrestler said? No you're making things up because you're argument is invalid. Let me refresh your memory with a tweet you shared with us in this thread that you posted: So yeah, you did mention about certain wrestlers that you have stated that they have no intention of ever going back or going to WWE, like I said, just because they may have stated that in the past that you have read up on to know that in order to tweet that to John Cone, doesn't mean they will stick with that statement. I didn't say that because "it was reported". I said it because it's fact. |
|
|
|
Post by wyleecyotee on Jun 19, 2013 14:01:06 GMT -5
Let me refresh your memory with a tweet you shared with us in this thread that you posted: So yeah, you did mention about certain wrestlers that you have stated that they have no intention of ever going back or going to WWE, like I said, just because they may have stated that in the past that you have read up on to know that in order to tweet that to John Cone, doesn't mean they will stick with that statement. I didn't say that because "it was reported". I said it because it's fact. Why is it fact? |
|
|
|
Post by Sam on Jun 19, 2013 14:01:24 GMT -5
Let me refresh your memory with a tweet you shared with us in this thread that you posted: So yeah, you did mention about certain wrestlers that you have stated that they have no intention of ever going back or going to WWE, like I said, just because they may have stated that in the past that you have read up on to know that in order to tweet that to John Cone, doesn't mean they will stick with that statement. I didn't say that because "it was reported". I said it because it's fact. Facts can be reported you know, so for you to know this "fact", it would have been reported. |
|
