Deleted
Joined on: May 12, 2024 8:58:08 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 30, 2013 2:10:18 GMT -5
I would love to see WWE actually just have feuds over the belt. None of that "I beat you, you beat me, let's fight on PPV." stuff, I want actual feuds. I would love to see Big E. & Ryback actually FEUD over the belt. Then have Langston and Mark Henry have an actual storyline over the belt. I would love to see WWE just give us some worthwhile storylines with the mid-card titles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jack on Nov 30, 2013 2:55:42 GMT -5
Ziggler could do it. It would need to be someone who could pull of a lot of good matches.
|
|
|
|
Post by Duck Holliday on Nov 30, 2013 3:04:38 GMT -5
As has been said a lot in reference to the unification of the major titles.. the IC belt does need to be emphasized more, and yes you need to do this through having legitimate feuds with top stars going after it. It should be top stars who aren't quite ready for the main title (Sandow, Ziggler, Ambrose, ect) and guys that are just past their prime who can still add legitimacy to the title fight, but probably wont be considered for a long-term WWE reign (RVD, Jericho, ect).
The US title needs to be for slightly lower/younger guys who have potential, but need to work on stuff like mic skills, character, while getting more face-time. Guys like Big E and Reigns are tailored for this.
|
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Nov 30, 2013 15:22:03 GMT -5
There is no reason to invest in the IC Title. The WWE doesn't care so why should we. Its a worthless title thrown around every so often. If the IC Champs were involved in storylines we would have a reason to enjoy it. A few years ago Cody seemed to be doing that but very quickly found himself doing nothing. Wade Barrett this year had a interesting gimmick but they did nothing to make us interested in the guy. Umm yeah that's what I'm saying. Involve them in a worthwhile storyline. You just tried to disagree with me but ended up agreeing with me.  Not sure where your coming from. I read the title of the thread and posted. Not sure what your talking ABOUT. Chill. |
|
|
|
Post by MrPerfect25 on Nov 30, 2013 16:07:44 GMT -5
Umm yeah that's what I'm saying. Involve them in a worthwhile storyline. You just tried to disagree with me but ended up agreeing with me. Not sure where your coming from. I read the title of the thread and posted. Not sure what your talking ABOUT. Chill. I am chill? Not sure who's upset but it isn't me. You just reiterated what I was saying. You said "if the IC champs were involved in a storyline we'd have reason to enjoy it." My idea was a storyline....... |
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Nov 30, 2013 16:12:22 GMT -5
Not sure where your coming from. I read the title of the thread and posted. Not sure what your talking ABOUT. Chill. I am chill? Not sure who's upset but it isn't me. You just reiterated what I was saying. You said "if the IC champs were involved in a storyline we'd have reason to enjoy it." My idea was a storyline....... Not everyone comes on here to look for all your posts. I never read your post and posted my thoughts on the topic. You gotta chill because I have no clu if I was agreeing or disagreeing with you and I don't care. |
|
|
|
Post by MrPerfect25 on Nov 30, 2013 16:15:07 GMT -5
I am chill? Not sure who's upset but it isn't me. You just reiterated what I was saying. You said "if the IC champs were involved in a storyline we'd have reason to enjoy it." My idea was a storyline....... Not everyone comes on here to look for all your posts. I never read your post and posted my thoughts on the topic. You gotta chill because I have no clu if I was agreeing or disagreeing with you and I don't care. Wwell that's on you then bro. Read the op's comment when you open threads. It will save you from speaking repetitive jibberish from here on out. I wasn't getting an attitude, just figuring out if you were agreeing or not. Maybe you were speaking Canadian  |
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Dec 1, 2013 14:03:58 GMT -5
Not everyone comes on here to look for all your posts. I never read your post and posted my thoughts on the topic. You gotta chill because I have no clu if I was agreeing or disagreeing with you and I don't care. Wwell that's on you then bro. Read the op's comment when you open threads. It will save you from speaking repetitive jibberish from here on out. I wasn't getting an attitude, just figuring out if you were agreeing or not. Maybe you were speaking Canadian ...or I can read the topic name and skim through the posts. Don't have to read every OP post if the topic is pretty straight forward. If you don't like it skip over the posts you don't want to read, unless that is too much effort for most Americans |
|
