|
Post by RybackV1 on Jan 11, 2014 16:58:00 GMT -5
Is anyone else thrilled that they took their time with this thing and waited it out to make it best as it could possibly be? I mean seriously it can't get any better. It blew my expectations through the roof.
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Jan 11, 2014 16:59:07 GMT -5
One article stated this which is good news: "More than 1,500 hours of archived programming, that includes the WCW and ECW video libraries, will air uncut and uncensored, so references to the World Wrestling Federation, old logos, or matches involving former wrestler Chris Benoit or former announcer Jesse Ventura will no longer be scrubbed from history." Since when was Ventura banned from history?
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on Jan 12, 2014 13:33:55 GMT -5
I just hope the attitude DVD is on here. I am too cheap to go and buy it but I really want to see it. Haha.
|
|
|
Post by Goldust on Jan 12, 2014 13:52:51 GMT -5
One article stated this which is good news: "More than 1,500 hours of archived programming, that includes the WCW and ECW video libraries, will air uncut and uncensored, so references to the World Wrestling Federation, old logos, or matches involving former wrestler Chris Benoit or former announcer Jesse Ventura will no longer be scrubbed from history." Since when was Ventura banned from history? I know his commentary is missing from the War Games Blu Ray.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 26, 2024 16:06:18 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2014 13:56:16 GMT -5
9.99 a month for the first 6 months......... 39.99 each month after that LOL
|
|
|
Post by CMPUNKISGOOD on Jan 12, 2014 18:12:50 GMT -5
9.99 a month for the first 6 months......... 39.99 each month after that LOL Where did you see that
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 26, 2024 16:06:18 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 12, 2014 22:54:58 GMT -5
I hope the jerks that sell the Coliseum home video tapes have to sell them at pennies after this thing comes out. What they want to charge is ridiculous. I hope they lose their shirts!
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Jan 13, 2014 1:36:32 GMT -5
9.99 a month for the first 6 months......... 39.99 each month after that LOL That's been listed absolutely nowhere.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 26, 2024 16:06:18 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 13, 2014 15:19:23 GMT -5
I cant wait for this to come up to Canada....even if they raised the cost to $14.99 a month, its still worth it for the PPV's alone!
|
|
|
Post by Brad on Jan 13, 2014 18:20:02 GMT -5
I cant wait for this to come up to Canada....even if they raised the cost to $14.99 a month, its still worth it for the PPV's alone! I'd pay up to 20 a month. 9.99 is a friggin steal.
|
|
|
Post by East Coast on Jan 13, 2014 18:28:40 GMT -5
i hope it has a large archive of TV tapings.
I know I saw a WCCW section under one of the category listings......when they were demoing the network, during the presentation.
ESPN Classic still runs AWA and GWF at nite. So does WWE not own that footage?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 26, 2024 16:06:18 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 14, 2014 9:44:23 GMT -5
I cant wait for this to come up to Canada....even if they raised the cost to $14.99 a month, its still worth it for the PPV's alone! I'd pay up to 20 a month. 9.99 is a friggin steal. As would I. Even at $19.99 a month, thats only $240. I spend that on a few ppv's every year, so why not get all of them plus the additional stuff.....its a no brainer!
|
|
|
Post by MrPerfect25 on Jan 14, 2014 13:33:14 GMT -5
I'm sure this has been asked 603 times in the 24 pages of this thread, so I apologize......but have they announced a date when we can start to sign up and order it?
|
|
|
Post by metallica90 on Jan 14, 2014 14:12:30 GMT -5
I'm sure this has been asked 603 times in the 24 pages of this thread, so I apologize......but have they announced a date when we can start to sign up and order it? Feb 24th I believe.
|
|
|
Post by MrPerfect25 on Jan 14, 2014 14:14:34 GMT -5
I'm sure this has been asked 603 times in the 24 pages of this thread, so I apologize......but have they announced a date when we can start to sign up and order it? Feb 24th I believe. That's when it launches and goes live. I'm talking about when can we order it? The freaking thing will crash if the sign up launches at the same time as it's available.
|
|
dixol
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 26, 2012 12:33:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,136
|
Post by dixol on Jan 14, 2014 14:21:25 GMT -5
That's when it launches and goes live. I'm talking about when can we order it? The freaking thing will crash if the sign up launches at the same time as it's available. As of right now, you can order on Feb 24. No pre-sale info has been announced. Remember, 1st week is free to all!
|
|
|
Post by MrPerfect25 on Jan 14, 2014 14:30:30 GMT -5
Ahh I didn't know the first week is free. That makes sense then.
|
|
|
Post by mikey1974 on Jan 14, 2014 14:54:22 GMT -5
this ruling could potentially be a crippling blow to he new network: news.yahoo.com/u-appeals-court-kills-net-neutrality-152413671.htmlI say POTENTIALLY,because we haven't seen it's effects yet. but what this ruling does,basically, is overturn a decision in 2010 that imposed network neutrality regulation on ISP's (Internet Service Providers),basically meaning they couldn't block or filter any lawful content on the internet. by striking this down,the court will basically allow ISP's to decide what you can and cannot view on the internet,including,yes,streaming and video services such as Netflix or the WWE Network. it allows your ISP to block any sites it wants to,and and content it wants to. it also allows them to not provide the net for all websites at the same speeds. for instance,if the ISP you have has a sponsor or sponsors,or partners,they're allowed to connect to those sites with greater broadband speed than non-sponsored sites.the court's ruling takes into account that if a consumer is not satisfied with the performance of their current ISP,they can switch to another one. what they DIDN'T take into account is there are still plenty of areas in the country where there are no other options for ISP's,due to provider exclusivity agreements in the area's,meaning if their ISP is blocking sites they like,or netflix,or whatever,they have no other options for internet service. what does this mean for WWE Network? let's say you get your internet through DirecTV. right now,they're not too happy with the WWE Network coming,and have threatened to drop all WWE PPV's from the service. what this would allow DirecTV to do is,if they chose,to block the WWE Network from streaming over any internet services they provide,meaning you won't get the Network. and,the option is there to switch to another ISP,but that's provided you even can. the crippling blow could come if Cable and Satellite network's all over decide,because of the perceived loss of PPV revenue thanks to the WWE,to block the streaming of the WWE Network over their internet services. which could potentially block a lot of customers from being able to receive the Network.we'll just have to wait and see how spiteful these companies decide to be,cause now they're allowed to be as spiteful as they wanna be!
|
|
dixol
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 26, 2012 12:33:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,136
|
Post by dixol on Jan 14, 2014 14:57:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Jan 15, 2014 11:35:07 GMT -5
this ruling could potentially be a crippling blow to he new network: news.yahoo.com/u-appeals-court-kills-net-neutrality-152413671.htmlI say POTENTIALLY,because we haven't seen it's effects yet. but what this ruling does,basically, is overturn a decision in 2010 that imposed network neutrality regulation on ISP's (Internet Service Providers),basically meaning they couldn't block or filter any lawful content on the internet. by striking this down,the court will basically allow ISP's to decide what you can and cannot view on the internet,including,yes,streaming and video services such as Netflix or the WWE Network. it allows your ISP to block any sites it wants to,and and content it wants to. it also allows them to not provide the net for all websites at the same speeds. for instance,if the ISP you have has a sponsor or sponsors,or partners,they're allowed to connect to those sites with greater broadband speed than non-sponsored sites.the court's ruling takes into account that if a consumer is not satisfied with the performance of their current ISP,they can switch to another one. what they DIDN'T take into account is there are still plenty of areas in the country where there are no other options for ISP's,due to provider exclusivity agreements in the area's,meaning if their ISP is blocking sites they like,or netflix,or whatever,they have no other options for internet service. what does this mean for WWE Network? let's say you get your internet through DirecTV. right now,they're not too happy with the WWE Network coming,and have threatened to drop all WWE PPV's from the service. what this would allow DirecTV to do is,if they chose,to block the WWE Network from streaming over any internet services they provide,meaning you won't get the Network. and,the option is there to switch to another ISP,but that's provided you even can. the crippling blow could come if Cable and Satellite network's all over decide,because of the perceived loss of PPV revenue thanks to the WWE,to block the streaming of the WWE Network over their internet services. which could potentially block a lot of customers from being able to receive the Network.we'll just have to wait and see how spiteful these companies decide to be,cause now they're allowed to be as spiteful as they wanna be! DirecTV does not offer internet directly, they bundle it with other service providers, but that's it. In that case, I don't think they'd be able to regulate anything, unless the ISP (which has it's own customers as well) came to the same conclusion that DirecTV did. Granted, I'm sure they could separate specific IPs that are assigned to DirecTV customers, but it would probably be more hassle than it was worth just to say "ha ha, we got you." If ISPs start blocking streaming content, more and more people are going to look elsewhere. This may give them the right, but I don't see much coming of it. Cable companies are already walking on thin ice with most customers. Limiting what they can use their internet for would probably be the final straw for a lot more people than they're willing to lose.
|
|