Could Vinny Mac blame Trips? (WrestleMania speculation)

I don't watch wrestling anymore so I could be wrong, but I couldn't see the E' pulling a stunt like that at Mania. A regular PPV? Maybe. A Raw? Probably. But to use Mania like that? Couldn't see it happening.

They wouldn't/shouldn't do it at Mania. If this should of ever happened it should of happened the night after the Rumble so we could get a good Mania.

Well I'll be there and if it stays Orton/Batista I'll do my best along with the people I'm going with to get the crowd to crap on the main event.

Give it up, Shane is not coming back.

Orton vs Batista isn't going on last. If Bryan doesn't get added to the match, it's going on earlier in the show.

Honestly Bryan/Triple H needs to go on last if they want to avoid a WM25 repeat or even worse a WMXX (Brock/Goldberg) repeat where Batista/Orton stop giving a because the crowd craps on them.

Other then Triple H/Bryan nothing could headline. I'm honestly worried about Undertakers match this year. If its Taker/Brock then I can't see that going on last but its another match that shouldn't be followed by Batista/Orton at all.

WWE would be plain stupid to allow HHH to put himself over Daniel Bryan. Its already bad enough they have Orton/Batista headlining. The fans will turn this WM into a huge joke and mockery.

if they are building Lesnar for UT they have botched it with the pathetic display at EC. Lesnar looks like a pissant now...he needed 50 chair shots to subdue the disposable Show who everybody and their mother has beaten clean last year.

then Show walks to the back after all those shots......I DESPAIR.

Yeah. Don't get me wrong. I think Lesnar and Taker could have a great match at Wrestlemania, but I just don't think it has any real story behind it. Perhaps it doesn't need to have anything huge, but we've become a bit spoiled in recent years with Taker's Mania opponents. They all had legitimate gripes and/or reasons for challenging the streak (though I don't think Punk's was necessarily all that great.)

The problem is that Lesnar has already laid out exactly what he wants - a title shot. The Undertaker is nowhere near the title, nor will he be come Wrestlemania, so challenging Taker seems to go against everything Lesnar and Heyman really set out to do.

From a character standpoint, Lesnar challenging Taker is him conceding defeat to the Authority in his plight to obtain a Championship match. Granted, you could have Taker call out Lesnar, but for what?

It would be a different story if, say, Lesnar hadn't lost since coming back and had completely dismantled The Big Show with no steel chair. Then he looks like a massive threat to The Undertaker. But, come on, the guy has lost to John Cena, Triple H, and is walking away from fights on a regular basis. I've said it before, and I'll say it again - Brock Lesnar should be walking away from no one. The "I don't fight for free" gimmick is perfectly fine, because he's not working TV matches, but if someone tries to kick has ass, Lesnar shouldn't be running away.

I just think they've sort of booked themselves into a corner here with the "I want a title match" thing. If they weren't going to give it to him, what reason does he even have to show up?

I thought for sure when Heyman made his demands on Raw, Batista was going to respond and offer to put his title shot on the line against Lesnar at Elimination Chamber. Instead, they just let the whole thing fizzle out.