|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Apr 20, 2014 14:23:45 GMT -5
I like the days of the brand split and it was every other month that a brand had a PPV. Still gave 12 ppvs, but not all were all encompassing, allowing more talent to be highlighted.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 29, 2024 8:14:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2014 14:29:27 GMT -5
When I had to pay for them... Yes way too many! Now that they included on WWE network.... bring em on!! This 10 times over. At $10 a month they can do a PPV twice a month for all I care. totally agree. When paying I'd say have 6, but with the network I say have 24.
|
|
|
Post by Matt on Apr 20, 2014 14:34:37 GMT -5
They need Armageddon, King Of The Ring, and No Mercy back.
|
|
|
Post by BulletV1 on Apr 20, 2014 14:45:42 GMT -5
Who cares at this point? The only reason in the past less PPVs would be good is not having to fork out $60 a month for them. Now, it's $9.99 a month for the PPV and a ton of other content so I'd be fine with 1 a week at this point.
|
|
MattPenrose13
Main Eventer
6 UK Refs
Joined on: Jul 3, 2007 12:51:48 GMT -5
Posts: 1,278
|
Post by MattPenrose13 on Apr 20, 2014 15:17:00 GMT -5
I'd have said stick with 12 if they still did brand-specific PPV's and crossed at the big 4, but because they do not do that anymore I think they should have 6:
January - Royal Rumble February - No Way Out March/April - Wrestlemania June - Extreme Rules August - Summerslam October - Survivor Series
I would vote for seven and bring back Armageddon in December if there was a choice for that.
|
|
|
Post by HVMMONS on Apr 20, 2014 15:18:22 GMT -5
75% of the feuds are mediocre with 12 PPVS. 6 would float my boat fine.
But now since the Network is a thing, it really doesn't matter.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 29, 2024 8:14:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2014 16:31:54 GMT -5
As stated before… with the WWE Network now available, it would be absolutely ridiculous to have anything less than 12 ppv's. 4 weeks is more than enough time to fill a compelling card.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 29, 2024 8:14:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2014 17:09:19 GMT -5
It should be 6- February- rumble April- mania June- extreme rules August- summerslam October- survivor series December- TLC (my favorite gimmick ppv)
|
|
|
Post by Flair Forever on Apr 20, 2014 20:46:04 GMT -5
I wish they'd move some of them to Saturday nights instead of Sunday......
Most of us need to work the next morning - I'd love to have a "PPV" party every month now that the WWE Network is providing these things, however it's hard to have people over to my house until 11:00 when I need to be up at 4:30 AM the next morning....
But if they were on Saturday nights..... now that would be a fun party!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 29, 2024 8:14:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2014 20:48:38 GMT -5
When I had to pay for them... Yes way too many! Now that they included on WWE network.... bring em on!! I agree with this. I do wish that feuds were given more time to develop and were given proper builds for pay off matches. One of the solutions I've considered for this would be fewer PPVs.
|
|
|
Post by BulletV1 on Apr 20, 2014 20:50:03 GMT -5
Friday and Saturdays are were shows go to die a slow death. Most people are out doing things on Friday/Saturday so buyrates would go down on the PPV model. Now it doesn't really matter if the PPVs are added to the Network right away.
|
|
|
Post by Duck Holliday on Apr 20, 2014 23:01:47 GMT -5
The network kind of changes the rules, but in general I would be a fan of the 6-8 PPV's. Now it makes sense to have 12 to illustrate the value of the network.
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Apr 21, 2014 4:16:02 GMT -5
Survivor Series in October?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 29, 2024 8:14:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2014 4:22:10 GMT -5
I agree that there is too many PPVs. Have said so for quite some time.
|
|
Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD
Main Eventer
I need a monster condom for my magnum sized dong.
Joined on: Nov 25, 2011 16:25:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,713
|
Post by Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD on Apr 21, 2014 17:26:45 GMT -5
No, 12 is fine. What isn't fine is having having 3 of their Champions without a storyline and 1 with only one televised defense in 5 months.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 29, 2024 8:14:17 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2014 17:57:40 GMT -5
No Monthly is the way to go.
|
|
|
Post by speaktomeworriers on Apr 21, 2014 18:00:41 GMT -5
No Monthly is the way to go. thx for making this your first post in almost 5 months
|
|
|
Post by speaktomeworriers on Apr 21, 2014 18:09:59 GMT -5
I see alot of posts here saying, for 10 dollars a month i want 12 ppvs or more..but thats not really the point i was trying to make, but i understand your point...but I was just trying to say that the quality of the product isnt as good as it could be if ppl had to wait for something exciting, ... but again thats just my opinion, i always enjoyed wrestling more, when i had to wait for something big to happen, and i didnt know everything that was going to happen a week in advance
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Apr 21, 2014 18:22:42 GMT -5
Friday and Saturdays are were shows go to die a slow death. Most people are out doing things on Friday/Saturday so buyrates would go down on the PPV model. Now it doesn't really matter if the PPVs are added to the Network right away. That is the reason why the WWE stopped having SummerSlam on Monday's and the Survivor Series on Wednesday's. The WWE knew by doing PPV's on Sundays, you can get more eyes to be home and watch an event. Sunday is usually the day that most people chillax and have a good time in the comfort of their own home.
|
|
|
Post by CrossRhodes on Apr 21, 2014 18:23:30 GMT -5
Keep them all, the more the merrier for any committed fan surely!? (Maybe bring back some of the golden oldies like King of the Ring?)
|
|