Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 19:52:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2014 15:33:31 GMT -5
Maybe he did fail a random wellness test who knows. Lol, would WWE really suspend someone over some weed in 2014? It's a legit question, because I honestly don't know. For example, my jobs "Drug Policy" was recently updated, and basically as long as you don't show up to work stoned, they don't care what you do in you're free time. Point is, in 2014 weed in viewed differently than say 2004.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 19:52:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2014 15:37:45 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Jul 31, 2014 15:46:11 GMT -5
Maybe he did fail a random wellness test who knows. Lol, would WWE really suspend someone over some weed in 2014? It's a legit question, because I honestly don't know. For example, my jobs "Drug Policy" was recently updated, and basically as long as you don't show up to work stoned, they don't care what you do in you're free time. Point is, in 2014 weed in viewed differently than say 2004. Yeah I was just joking I think WWE just fines for pot now (if that ) Speaking of 2004 I was watching Vince on Off the record from that year yesterday and he straight said at the time they didn't drug test whatsoever. Steriods included. I was kinda shocked. Obviously Benoit changed things.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 19:52:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2014 16:25:20 GMT -5
Lol, would WWE really suspend someone over some weed in 2014? It's a legit question, because I honestly don't know. For example, my jobs "Drug Policy" was recently updated, and basically as long as you don't show up to work stoned, they don't care what you do in you're free time. Point is, in 2014 weed in viewed differently than say 2004. Yeah I was just joking I think WWE just fines for pot now (if that ) Speaking of 2004 I was watching Vince on Off the record from that year yesterday and he straight said at the time they didn't drug test whatsoever. Steriods included. I was kinda shocked. Obviously Benoit changed things. So basically, in the long run, RVD Is working for WWE for free when you subtract his fines from his salary lol. Yea, they had to change after the whole Benoit incident. Could you imagine if another similar situation played out for the second time? WWE already got a huge backlash, but I think for the most part they got a pass at the end of it all because it was a one time incident. if it happened again all hell would break loose and I could see WWE getting sued, fined, and possibly put out of buisness.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 19:52:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2014 16:30:39 GMT -5
Smokin on that gas
|
|
|
Post by Self-Savior on Jul 31, 2014 16:40:02 GMT -5
Lol, would WWE really suspend someone over some weed in 2014? It's a legit question, because I honestly don't know. For example, my jobs "Drug Policy" was recently updated, and basically as long as you don't show up to work stoned, they don't care what you do in you're free time. Point is, in 2014 weed in viewed differently than say 2004. Yeah I was just joking I think WWE just fines for pot now (if that ) Speaking of 2004 I was watching Vince on Off the record from that year yesterday and he straight said at the time they didn't drug test whatsoever. Steriods included. I was kinda shocked. Obviously Benoit changed things. Not only Benoit, but Guerrero too. IIRC, they made adjustments to the policy right after Eddie passed away. I remember reading that Nick Dinsmore was all screwed up on pain pills not too long after Eddie died and they suspended him and didn't show back up until Rumble '06.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 19:52:39 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 31, 2014 16:44:17 GMT -5
Lol RVD is just like "what can I say"
|
|