underjohngrohs
Main Eventer
"Do I Have Everybody's Attention Now?"
Joined on: May 19, 2012 17:48:25 GMT -5
Posts: 2,959
|
Post by underjohngrohs on Aug 19, 2014 1:14:59 GMT -5
Well same show, different beatdowns at the end of RAW. The Authority doesn't want to end RAW without them beating the crap out of someone. I say it's time it ends right now. Cause they have a lot of people on that group. Nikki Bella. Stephanie Mcmahon. Kane. Randy Orton. Seth Rollins. Triple H and Brock Lesnar is likely joining them too cause remember him and Paul Heyman shook hands with them. But I think somebody should end them for good. There's got to be a change in the WWE.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Aug 19, 2014 1:27:01 GMT -5
Yes, I think the Authority should stay.
No, I don't think they should go.
|
|
|
|
Post by BØRNS on Aug 19, 2014 2:35:21 GMT -5
It needs to continue.
|
|
|
|
Post by wwextreme25 on Aug 19, 2014 2:59:20 GMT -5
how do i even answer this...you're asking two different things lol.
|
|
Mr. K.O
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 24, 2010 19:04:14 GMT -5
Posts: 4,094
|
Post by Mr. K.O on Aug 19, 2014 3:40:27 GMT -5
Should The Authority stay or go?
"Yes or No"
Wait what? Anyways, they should stay.
|
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Cinnamon! on Aug 19, 2014 3:42:35 GMT -5
The Authority are best for business.
|
|
|
|
Post by OmegaGaijin on Aug 19, 2014 4:09:05 GMT -5
I'm done with on screen authority figures all together in any company.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 18, 2024 11:51:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2014 7:41:23 GMT -5
No due to Steph's body being on my tv every week.
You take that away from me and I weep.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 18, 2024 11:51:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2014 7:44:47 GMT -5
I enjoy the Authority every week, so no. I do think that maybe the promos at the start of the show re a bit too long, but it's nothing major as they're usually good. how do i even answer this...you're asking two different things lol. Holy sh*t you actually came on WF  |
|
|
|
Post by #DI-WHY? on Aug 19, 2014 7:54:14 GMT -5
Fixed.
The authority isn't the problem. Kane is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jaz on Aug 19, 2014 7:55:04 GMT -5
Yes, they should go away. Or at least stop being all over the shows. Honestly, I'd like to see someone count how many times Triple H/Stephanie have opened Raw over the past year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Midnight on Aug 19, 2014 8:44:48 GMT -5
The Authority is one of the best things going right now, why end it?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Aug 19, 2014 9:01:59 GMT -5
I enjoy the Authority. Triple H is pretty entertaining, Stephanie McMahon is hot, it made Seth Rollins a heel and while it has neutered Randy Orton and keeps boring ass Kane on my screen, overall it's best for business.
|
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Aug 19, 2014 9:04:14 GMT -5
To get a baby-face over you need to have great a heel(s). Austin never would have reached the top without his feud with McMahon. Bryan needed to have his back against the wall to overcome the odds. Now Roman and Ambrose are benefiting from it. The Authority are serving their purpose to a tee.
Some people don't grasp that heels have to get the upper hand more often than not. Then you tune into a PPV to see the heels get their comeuppances. It's wrestling psychology 101.
|
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Aug 19, 2014 9:21:21 GMT -5
The Authority is awesome.
"Should they stay or go? Yes. No." makes no sense either. Change it.
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Aug 19, 2014 9:35:05 GMT -5
I enjoy the Authority. Triple H is pretty entertaining, Stephanie McMahon is hot, it made Seth Rollins a heel and while it has neutered Randy Orton and keeps boring ass Kane on my screen, overall it's best for business. I'm not a fan of Kane at this stage, but his type of character is pretty necessary to serve as the muscle for the Authority. That lap dog thing rings pretty true as evident from his interference with the Rollins and Ambrose situation. It makes more sense for him to serve in the suited role too because as a competitor, in full on Kane attire, he just competes with other members of the Authority, as seen with the Randy Orton situation. He's sort of found a niche to keep him on TV and relevant. I think the only thing that has really cut Orton off at the legs is the fact that he's being used to put guys over, more than make himself look good. Plus, the goal appears to be making Rollins the star of the show. I think both of those approaches are best for the longterm success of WWE. I really enjoy Corporate stables, especially when they keep getting over. It worked so well for Daniel Bryan and it's likely going to end up working again for Roman Reigns at some point, assuming Reigns can get himself to that point. |
|
|
|
Post by Robert69 on Aug 19, 2014 9:47:11 GMT -5
Yes, I think the Authority should stay. No, I don't think they should go. The way this question/poll is presented is terribly confusing. Do you work for the US Government, OP? ...I don't know what to do with my hands :/ And no, they can stay. Steph/HHH/Orton/Rollins/Kane/Nikki as a whole have been pretty damn entertaining, lately. Especially HHH/Steph. |
|
|
|
Post by Evil Abed on Aug 19, 2014 10:05:39 GMT -5
I like how they're starting to at least have a stable of wrestlers. Before it was just Rollins and Orton wrestling mostly with Kane being their lackey. Now they got multiple feuds going on - Ambrose/Rollins, Orton/Reigns, Brie/Nikki. Reminds me of the corporation days, I think they might need one or two lower card wrestlers but I think the Authority still has a lot of life left in it. I'd give it until Wrestlemania or Summerslam of next year. After that it will probably have lost steam.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 18, 2024 11:51:33 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2014 10:31:26 GMT -5
The Authority should stay IMO.
|
|
hbkowns
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 15, 2011 23:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 4,246
|
Post by hbkowns on Aug 19, 2014 11:09:17 GMT -5
I'm just getting sick of seeing Kane on my television.
|
|
