adecw
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 10, 2012 16:27:11 GMT -5
Posts: 1,060
|
Post by adecw on Aug 25, 2014 10:08:57 GMT -5
Just collecting thoughts on this if taker comes back surely he has to go after brock so could we see a taker/lesnar title match at mania (on a side note I have set this up in 2k14 by having taker return and win rumble lol)
|
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Aug 25, 2014 10:12:33 GMT -5
I doubt it. I think if Undertaker wrestles, it'll be against Sting. I don't think he can be relied on as the show-closing match anymore, either.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 23, 2024 8:28:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2014 10:24:02 GMT -5
I did something similar in my 2k14 universe. I had 'Taker defeat Brock at Armageddon, he surrendered the belt the next night which lead to Reigns winning the title in the Royal Rumble match (was supposed to be Bryan, but Reigns had a finisher stored lol). I then had Bryan win at WM.
|
|
Sky'sTheLimit
Superstar
Divas Defender, NXT Fanatic (formerly BlackWidow)
Joined on: May 12, 2009 11:17:50 GMT -5
Posts: 761 
|
Post by Sky'sTheLimit on Aug 25, 2014 10:28:45 GMT -5
I doubt it. I see it being either Sting or him not competing at all.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 23, 2024 8:28:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2014 10:46:48 GMT -5
Nope. I do see after whoever beats Brock for the title that Undertaker tears through the ring mat and pulls Brock to "hell".
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Aug 25, 2014 11:24:04 GMT -5
I sincerely hope not. Rock vs Brock is a much bigger match and I would much rather see Taker vs Sting as a special attraction match.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Aug 25, 2014 11:28:07 GMT -5
As far as I'm concerned, Brock Lesnar vs Undertaker is finished. There is no need for Taker to have kind of rematch both storyline wise and for logical reasons. Lesnar beat him clean. If they had a Rematch, Taker would need to win, which would make losing the Streak in the first place pointless. In all honesty, I'd rather Undertaker was inducted into the Hall of Fame, and just made one final appearance at Wrestlemania, possibly with Sting after Sting defeats Randy Orton.
|
|
|
|
Post by Word™ on Aug 25, 2014 11:34:55 GMT -5
We might never see The Undertaker wrestle again.. He's old school, he's the type that will retire with a loss, quietly..
And that's fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by sitruC on Aug 25, 2014 11:35:22 GMT -5
Taker is done.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Aug 25, 2014 11:37:01 GMT -5
Hell no. I don't think WWE would have him lose, then continue to compete at WM. I'm 99% sure he's done.
|
|
|
|
Post by McBlake on Aug 25, 2014 11:58:56 GMT -5
I sincerely hope not. Rock vs Brock is a much bigger match and I would much rather see Taker vs Sting as a special attraction match. Pretty much the 2 matches I'm wanting for Mania 31. |
|
ls1985uk
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Aug 17, 2014 10:28:47 GMT -5
Posts: 89
|
Post by ls1985uk on Aug 25, 2014 12:02:35 GMT -5
I sincerely hope not. Rock vs Brock is a much bigger match and I would much rather see Taker vs Sting as a special attraction match. Pretty much the 2 matches I'm wanting for Mania 31. The perfect Mania for me hope it happens |
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Aug 25, 2014 12:08:23 GMT -5
Nope. I do see after whoever beats Brock for the title that Undertaker tears through the ring mat and pulls Brock to "hell". this would be great. |
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Aug 25, 2014 12:54:48 GMT -5
There is no upside to a rematch between Brock Lesnar and The Undertaker. When booking a top caliber match, there needs to be an upside to it. With Lesnar/Taker at WrestleMania XXX, there was an upside. That upside being it re-charged Lesnar's batteries and gave him a win that cemented his legacy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ian from 616Entertainment. on Aug 25, 2014 12:55:36 GMT -5
No.
And if they ever did Taker vs. Lesnar again, Lesnar should beat him in about 5 minutes. I've always liked the idea of after Undertaker's streak ends, he would want to try and wash away the loss with a revenge win. Only when he steps in the ring again, he's get beat even quicker.
It's the perfect way to do it, like a real fighter, the fire still burns and he's still a bad ass, but his body can't do it anymore. It's not his fault, 30 years of dominating fools wears on you and your body can't hold up anymore.
At that point it'd be the realization of "oh man, I'm old. The game passed me by."
It's sad and it doesn't need to and absolutely shouldn't happen to Undertaker, I just like that storyline and I've used it in different games.
|
|
The Hitman
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 24, 2006 17:12:19 GMT -5
Posts: 2,377
|
Post by The Hitman on Aug 25, 2014 13:15:55 GMT -5
I have been thinking the same. I don't see Taker not returning. When he does, he can't just go into a program with Sting and not acknowledge Lesnar. Wouldn't make sense. But then again, this is the WWE.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 23, 2024 8:28:19 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2014 13:18:09 GMT -5
Nope. We will never see Taker vs. Lesnar again.
|
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Aug 25, 2014 14:30:57 GMT -5
Remember the whole Taker/HHH "It's Time" thing?
Taker returns to challenge Brock. Triple H comes out and says Taker's time has come and gone. When the streak died so did the Undertaker.
Taker grabs HHH and chokeslams him and says "You can't kill what's already dead."
The next week HHH comes out and stands on the stage. "Fine. Taker, you want one more match at WrestleMania? You've got it." And then he leaves. Nothing more is said by him.
Taker comes out the next week and thanks HHH for giving in and realizing Taker vs Brock II is "best for business." HHH comes out and tells Taker he needs to learn what is best for business. There's some commotion that causes the announcers to freak out, cuts to the ring where Taker is being spun around and laid out with an RKO.
Orton, "You're right. You can't kill what's already dead. But when something's dead you have to bury it."
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 23, 2024 8:28:20 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 25, 2014 14:38:30 GMT -5
No.
Taker should have one final match with Sting.
Or no match at all.
Regardless. He's the Undertaker. He can do whatever he damn well pleases.
The people who bitch and moan will bitch and moan regardless. So whatever Taker and WWE want to do is fine by me.
Taker is more legendary than any current performer so he's more than earned his right to either wrestle again or quietly retire.
|
|
|
|
Post by Evil Abed on Aug 25, 2014 15:31:53 GMT -5
No
There is no point for Taker to fight Brock again. From a storyline standpoint I get it but in reality, WWE would not put Brock in the ring with a broken down hobbled old man Taker unless they seriously wanted Brock to kill him.
Taker barely made it out of the last match against Brock, if Taker goes into a fight with Brock again, he'll end up in a wheel chair for life.
Taker should fight Sting at Mania or just call it a career. Theres no one else even close that is deserving of fighting Taker at Mania this year. Cena is the only other one who could be considered and now its pointless that the streak is over. Taker vs. Sting is the money match everyone wants to see and its now or never.
|
|
