|
Post by Robert69 on Sept 30, 2014 23:24:59 GMT -5
No, no, you're right. Clearly I'm mistaken. Obviously the slipping numbers over the years aren't enough; now all the "welp, time to watch Football" "I missed it, what happened? Oh nothing, as usual?" "WWE is getting worse by the week" comments I see are completely fabricated by me, to prove my point. And I would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for you meddling board members, and that darn dog, too!!! Don't condescend towards me. I disagreed with you in a very respectful manner, and then offered up my reasoning why I disagreed. I was respectful in my disagreement; be respectful in your rebuttal. My reasoning is based off of a mindset that is clearly shown by the IWC, DAILY, here on these very boards, AND in mainstream public, with the dwindling viewership. Clearly, there's a basis for me to use "we" and not "I". I was disrespectful? Dude, you need to take a break from the internet. I used "please" for Rang's sake. Relax. Feel free to talk about slipping numbers and people not enjoying the product, sure, those people exist. But that's not everyone. It's certainly not me. I think WWE is the best its been in the last 10 years and I'm having a blast. It definitely came across sarcastic in the context of the conversation. My response was in no way meant to be anything more than returning how I felt it came across. I would have agreed with you (about being the best it's been in 10 years) maybe -- 6 months ago? But lately I feel like it's been rough. I really look at it, and then look at NXT -- and wonder if maybe it's getting darn close to Vince passing the torch. I will say this -- WWE is more packed with POTENTIAL talent today than it has been since, what? Early attitude era? I just don't feel like they're taking advantage of it. They're wringing the name value out of current/past superstars to the point people seem to be turning on once fan favorites (The Rock, anyone?) -- with rough builds for 85% of their young talent (Shield members not withstanding)
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Oct 1, 2014 9:16:28 GMT -5
Going from 100% to 20% in a year is a steep drop but the WWE is having a bad year financially so any donation is nice.
Maybe next year it will be bumped back to 100% or at least higher than 20%?
|
|
|
Post by ¡Twist Of Cinnamon! on Oct 1, 2014 13:11:46 GMT -5
They're still donating, I don't see what the problem is. Its just complaining for the sake of it.
|
|
Mr Wrestling Jr.
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 6, 2010 7:07:35 GMT -5
Posts: 3,410
|
Post by Mr Wrestling Jr. on Oct 2, 2014 5:55:51 GMT -5
I guess I understand why they're not doing the full 100% seeing how bad their money has been this year. I'm more pissed about the lack of shirts this year. Last year everyone had one and they looked epic. This years it's just Cena, Hogan, the Bellas for some reason and the basic "Courage Conquer Cure" one.
|
|
Sonnen
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 16, 2010 8:42:36 GMT -5
Posts: 3,261
|
Post by Sonnen on Oct 2, 2014 13:46:32 GMT -5
The bigger issue is who they're donating to. Such a disgusting ing company, pick a good charity. What exactly are you trying to say? That donating to breast cancer is t good? Bc my mom along others moms have had this terrible disease and for you to say something along those lines is unacceptable. Correct me if I'm wrong Breast cancer is a fantastic cause to donate to. This company isn't, the money donated isn't being used right, it's going to executives and other bullcrap rather than the real issue. This company is ing horrid.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 11:32:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2014 13:50:40 GMT -5
What exactly are you trying to say? That donating to breast cancer is t good? Bc my mom along others moms have had this terrible disease and for you to say something along those lines is unacceptable. Correct me if I'm wrong Breast cancer is a fantastic cause to donate to. This company isn't, the money donated isn't being used right, it's going to executives and other bullcrap rather than the real issue. This company is ing horrid. There are a lot of good breast cancer charities out there, but SGK isn't one of them.
|
|
|
Post by BCizzle on Oct 2, 2014 15:51:32 GMT -5
Susan G Komen sucks, I would be fine if they donated zero percent of the proceeds to them. The money is just gonna go to their lawyers who like to sue anybody that uses the color pink.
|
|
|
Post by JC Motors on Oct 2, 2014 15:58:58 GMT -5
Donating the money is better than Linda spending it on a senate campaign
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 11:32:50 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 2, 2014 16:39:30 GMT -5
i doubt they gave 100%
|
|
|
Post by Grumpyoldman on Oct 2, 2014 16:43:26 GMT -5
|
|