|
Post by Chip on Sept 30, 2014 16:12:10 GMT -5
this is what happens when we have a WWE champion that can only wrestle a few times a year
BUT IT BRINGZ DEH PRESSTEEGE TO THE DOUBLE-LEE TITLE!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Sept 30, 2014 16:19:31 GMT -5
You can not build up the Ambrose vs Rollins feud for months and not give us the big payoff. But we've had TWO ppv pull apart brawls we should feel satisfied Not even remotely. You can not build up the Ambrose vs Rollins feud for months and not give us the big payoff. Vince didn't get the memo. #OutofTouchPainInTheAssWWELogic If Cena goes over both Ambrose and Rollins, it may be the worst booking decision since SummerSlam 2010.Agreed.
|
|
facemeat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jul 24, 2011 0:38:10 GMT -5
Posts: 2,891
|
Post by facemeat on Sept 30, 2014 16:22:10 GMT -5
I'm not saying that's not possible, but how would it make any sense? The Authority has been trying to keep Ambrose away from Rollins for a while...why would they suddenly want to lock him in a HIAC with him by screwing over Cena? Isn't it rumored Orton's going babyface? Maybe he does some crap to give Ambrose the shot at Rollins that they've been staving off. Ah, I hadn't read anything about the Orton rumors, so you could be right. I'm still not particularly hopeful about this angle being booked well, but I'll wait to see how it plays out before I comment further.
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Sept 30, 2014 16:29:53 GMT -5
It isn't as easy as it seems. The WWE is saving money but not having Brock Lesnar there. It helps the WWE's bottom line but showcasing to of your new main eventers in Dean Ambrose and Seth Rollins. I'd say, let both Rollins & Ambrose headline Hell In a Cell in the cell and test them to see how they fair well under that pressure. The network has changed how they plan PPV's now. I understand WHY they injected Cena into the feud, but I'm still upset by it. His inclusion is taking away from the build up of Ambrose/Rollins. I agree, they should be the main event of the PPV. If it takes having to watch Orton/Cena 20, then so be it. The WWE had to give Cena something to do. Right now, the main event roster is as thin as a sheet of paper. Had Daniel Bryan and Roman Reigns not been on the DL right now, the main event seen would be healthy. Everything the dirtsheets are saying is just pure speculation on their part. Come January, the main event seen would be in a better shape. The WWE has to really tread water with what they have left.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 19:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 16:33:02 GMT -5
I'm not saying that's not possible, but how would it make any sense? The Authority has been trying to keep Ambrose away from Rollins for a while...why would they suddenly want to lock him in a HIAC with him by screwing over Cena? Isn't it rumored Orton's going babyface? Maybe he does some crap to give Ambrose the shot at Rollins that they've been staving off.you believe that then come hell in a cell when Cena wins. I will be here to say I told you so.
the Definition of Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 19:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 16:36:31 GMT -5
Isn't it rumored Orton's going babyface? Maybe he does some crap to give Ambrose the shot at Rollins that they've been staving off. you believe that then come hell in a cell when Cena wins. I will be here to say I told you so.
the Definition of Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
Actually, you won't---you never 'told me so' to begin with. this is what happens when we have a WWE champion that can only wrestle a few times a year BUT IT BRINGZ DEH PRESSTEEGE TO THE DOUBLE-LEE TITLE!!!!!! No, this is what happens when we have a creatively bankrupt creative team that couldn't come up with anything better for Cena until Brock comes back. BUT DEY SHUD TOTALLY HAVE HAD ROLLINS CASH IN SO HE COULD LOSE THE BELT TO SENOR CUZ LOL WE'RE WF AND WE'RE NEVER HAPPY WITH ANYTHING AND WE'RE TOO SMART FOR THAT HEY WWE FLAIR HAD 21 REIGNS AND NO I DON'T MEAN ROMAN YOU GOOFS!!!!!!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 19:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 16:36:34 GMT -5
Isn't it rumored Orton's going babyface? Maybe he does some crap to give Ambrose the shot at Rollins that they've been staving off. you believe that then come hell in a cell when Cena wins. I will be here to say I told you so.
the Definition of Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
You should stop spewing such hatred and arrogance all the time. It can't be good for your health.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 19:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 16:40:19 GMT -5
If Seth had cashed in on Brock and won, everyone would be bitching.
If Seth had cashed in on Brock and lost, everyone would be bitching.
Cena wins, bitching.
Cena loses, bitching.
Now, we have legitimate build for an Ambrose/Cena match, and you know damn well, if Cena wins, Ambrose will still be heavily involved in the HIAC match and vice versa. Cena or Ambrose will probably lose to Rollins due to interference from the other. It won't be a heel turn, it'd be a face vs face type of build to add tension to the relationship between the two characters.
How about seeing how the angle plays out?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 19:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 17:37:39 GMT -5
Ugh. I'm so tired of Cena.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Sept 30, 2014 17:38:37 GMT -5
this is what happens when we have a WWE champion that can only wrestle a few times a year BUT IT BRINGZ DEH PRESSTEEGE TO THE DOUBLE-LEE TITLE!!!!!! It may not bring prestige, however I like that he's not always around. Makes his appearances more important. Some people won't see it that way and I get that.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 19:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 17:39:07 GMT -5
If Seth had cashed in on Brock and won, everyone would be bitching. If Seth had cashed in on Brock and lost, everyone would be bitching. Cena wins, bitching. Cena loses, bitching. Now, we have legitimate build for an Ambrose/Cena match, and you know damn well, if Cena wins, Ambrose will still be heavily involved in the HIAC match and vice versa. Cena or Ambrose will probably lose to Rollins due to interference from the other. It won't be a heel turn, it'd be a face vs face type of build to add tension to the relationship between the two characters. How about seeing how the angle plays out? If Ambrose wins, people will bitch because then Cena gets a rematch he'd likely win and "bury" him. I swear a good chunk this board is like a bunch of bipolar, schizophrenic women. They don't know what they want, they just know they want it now and they're not afraid to argue all day about it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 19:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 17:54:01 GMT -5
this is what happens when we have a WWE champion that can only wrestle a few times a year BUT IT BRINGZ DEH PRESSTEEGE TO THE DOUBLE-LEE TITLE!!!!!! It may not bring prestige, however I like that he's not always around. Makes his appearances more important. Some people won't see it that way and I get that. That's how it was when I was little and first started watching. When the champion was on TV, it was a big goddamn deal. Then the War came along and mucked that up. We got used to seeing title matches on big shows every month and there's an expectation that the champion should be around every week. You know what? Hogan didn't appear every week outside of Event Center promos hyping the house show main events. You got him on SNME and PPVs and very rarely otherwise. What's wrong with doing that now? What's wrong with the WWE World Heavyweight Champion meaning something?
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Sept 30, 2014 17:59:39 GMT -5
Typical WWE crap. Fans gets excited for a fresh star/feud and Cena needs to be injected into it. Rollins has been getting one over on Ambrose or months and I Dean doesn't finally go over it could kill his momentum.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 19:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 18:16:31 GMT -5
I like Cena but he can go f*ck himself. It's probably gonna turn out in a future interview that it was his idea to go into the feud
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Sept 30, 2014 19:22:21 GMT -5
I understand WHY they injected Cena into the feud, but I'm still upset by it. His inclusion is taking away from the build up of Ambrose/Rollins. I agree, they should be the main event of the PPV. If it takes having to watch Orton/Cena 20, then so be it. The WWE had to give Cena something to do. Right now, the main event roster is as thin as a sheet of paper. Had Daniel Bryan and Roman Reigns not been on the DL right now, the main event seen would be healthy. Everything the dirtsheets are saying is just pure speculation on their part. Come January, the main event seen would be in a better shape. The WWE has to really tread water with what they have left. Which is why I'm so confused as to why WWE isn't using Lesnar. Lesnar/Cena inside the Cell would draw. Cena/Orton, not so much.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Sept 30, 2014 19:33:25 GMT -5
The WWE had to give Cena something to do. Right now, the main event roster is as thin as a sheet of paper. Had Daniel Bryan and Roman Reigns not been on the DL right now, the main event seen would be healthy. Everything the dirtsheets are saying is just pure speculation on their part. Come January, the main event seen would be in a better shape. The WWE has to really tread water with what they have left. Which is why I'm so confused as to why WWE isn't using Lesnar. Lesnar/Cena inside the Cell would draw. Cena/Orton, not so much. Because, money. Also, I hate that John Cena is involved in this. I'm not as against Cena as some other people are, but he has no claim to get his hands on Seth before Dean.
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Sept 30, 2014 19:39:04 GMT -5
Which is why I'm so confused as to why WWE isn't using Lesnar. Lesnar/Cena inside the Cell would draw. Cena/Orton, not so much. Because, money. Also, I hate that John Cena is involved in this. I'm not as against Cena as some other people are, but he has no claim to get his hands on Seth before Dean. I understand it's due to money reasons, but without the title involved Cena/Rollins is bogus. With the lack of main event guys, this is the perfect time for WWE to utilize Lesnar. Like I've said, I absolutely understand WHY, but I don't agree with it whatsoever. If WWE had Reigns, Bryan, and Punk I'd get them giving Lesnar a month off. Without all four of them? Hell in a Cell is a lame duck PPV.
|
|
|
Post by The Yes Man on Sept 30, 2014 19:55:35 GMT -5
If Cena faces Rollins in the Cell, then this company can officially itself.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 19:29:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2014 19:57:47 GMT -5
Because, money. Also, I hate that John Cena is involved in this. I'm not as against Cena as some other people are, but he has no claim to get his hands on Seth before Dean. I understand it's due to money reasons, but without the title involved Cena/Rollins is bogus. With the lack of main event guys, this is the perfect time for WWE to utilize Lesnar. Like I've said, I absolutely understand WHY, but I don't agree with it whatsoever. If WWE had Reigns, Bryan, and Punk I'd get them giving Lesnar a month off. Without all four of them? Hell in a Cell is a lame duck PPV. Or it's a potentially meaningful match for Rollins without him having to risk his briefcase and being screwed out of the main event scene. With the lack of main event guys, this is the perfect time for WWE to try programs like this to elevate guys so that when they get the belt back full time, it's not just Cena and a revolving door of guys underneath him. They have a real shot to get some new guys cemented (Ambrose and Rollins) as top guys before the WWE Title comes back into the fold. Now, with that said---Rollins should face Ambrose in the Cell without question. I'm still thinking they have some screwy finish and Cena ends up with Orton and we get Rollins vs. Ambrose in the Cell, but if we DID get Rollins/Cena and Ambrose/Orton, those are still relatively fresh matches.
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Sept 30, 2014 20:11:05 GMT -5
Typical WWE crap. Fans gets excited for a fresh star/feud and Cena needs to be injected into it. Rollins has been getting one over on Ambrose or months and I Dean doesn't finally go over it could kill his momentum. If Cena wasn't involved, what exactly can he do at the moment? There isn't a slew of guys he can have a short term program with. In the process, Dean Ambrose can get the rub from Cena to make him look like a bigger deal. The WWE had to give Cena something to do. Right now, the main event roster is as thin as a sheet of paper. Had Daniel Bryan and Roman Reigns not been on the DL right now, the main event seen would be healthy. Everything the dirtsheets are saying is just pure speculation on their part. Come January, the main event seen would be in a better shape. The WWE has to really tread water with what they have left. Which is why I'm so confused as to why WWE isn't using Lesnar. Lesnar/Cena inside the Cell would draw. Cena/Orton, not so much. Are you willing to donate some funds to give the WWE to pay to see Lesnar appear more often? I'd think not. The WWE is trying to use Lesnar sparingly because the more they use him, the more $$$ they have to pay him. Lesnar should be used as special attraction, not like another guy on the roster.
|
|