|
Post by rustyy on Oct 16, 2014 17:19:26 GMT -5
Don't worry, he's too talented, it'll be put on Roman/Cena/Orton for the next few years. Maybe Seth unless Vince gets bored with him. He hit the glass ceiling. Hard.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 25, 2024 19:29:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2014 17:42:08 GMT -5
yes, please
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 25, 2024 19:29:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 16, 2014 17:47:48 GMT -5
Wyatt doesn't need the title? Are you guys forgetting the Undertaker, the basic equivalent of a zombie, won his first WWF title in 1991? I hope Wyatt gets the title eventually. I'd rather Harper or Rowan win it than Bray...they don't talk so much that I tune them out & I prefer their style of wrestling
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Yeeter on Oct 16, 2014 18:10:32 GMT -5
Wyatt doesn't need the title? Are you guys forgetting the Undertaker, the basic equivalent of a zombie, won his first WWF title in 1991? I hope Wyatt gets the title eventually. Then lost it within a week and didn't win it again for over five years.
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Oct 16, 2014 18:27:54 GMT -5
Wyatt doesn't need the title? Are you guys forgetting the Undertaker, the basic equivalent of a zombie, won his first WWF title in 1991? I hope Wyatt gets the title eventually. I am going to lay down the facts here. The Undertaker was used a pawn to vacate the WWF Championship and give it to Ric Flair while not making Hulk Hogan look weak. Why do people overlook 'Taker's first WWF Championship reign? 'cause it meant nothing. It was merely used as a vehicle to get the belt held up in abeyance and build heat for a possible Hogan/Flair match at WrestleMania VIII. Read my prior post when I made the comparison with Bray Wyatt and Jake Roberts.
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Oct 16, 2014 18:33:00 GMT -5
I sincerely doubt that. Is he deserving? Maybe. Will he be? I don't think they have the faith to have him carry the company.
|
|
|
Post by Rule 30 on Oct 16, 2014 19:38:02 GMT -5
Should/could he be World Champion within the next year? I'd say so. Will anyone not named Brock Lesnar, John Cena, or Roman Reigns be? Nope. Maybe Seth or Ambrose if we're lucky, but six months ago I thought a Wyatt title run was definite too.
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Oct 16, 2014 20:36:50 GMT -5
im not a fan of a guy winning the WWE Championship within his first 2 years on the active roster and im not counting Husky Harris at all.
I feel like the WWE title should be given to guys who EARN it. Not used as a storyline prop to "get someone over" or to "get heel heat"
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Oct 16, 2014 21:06:35 GMT -5
im not a fan of a guy winning the WWE Championship within his first 2 years on the active roster and im not counting Husky Harris at all. I feel like the WWE title should be given to guys who EARN it. Not used as a storyline prop to "get someone over" or to "get heel heat" This. The only guy that I felt it worked for was Brock Lesnar back in 2002. I've never liked it when a guy wins the title super quickly. It usually ends in a mid-card career for the dude. See Jack Swagger, Alberto Del Rio, etc.
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Oct 16, 2014 21:39:12 GMT -5
im not a fan of a guy winning the WWE Championship within his first 2 years on the active roster and im not counting Husky Harris at all. I feel like the WWE title should be given to guys who EARN it. Not used as a storyline prop to "get someone over" or to "get heel heat" im not a fan of a guy winning the WWE Championship within his first 2 years on the active roster and im not counting Husky Harris at all. I feel like the WWE title should be given to guys who EARN it. Not used as a storyline prop to "get someone over" or to "get heel heat" This. The only guy that I felt it worked for was Brock Lesnar back in 2002. I've never liked it when a guy wins the title super quickly. It usually ends in a mid-card career for the dude. See Jack Swagger, Alberto Del Rio, etc. It is sad how the WWE gives guys championships and expects them to get over. It is like saying trying to get an un-electrified train moving without a locomotive trying to push it to the next station. Maybe that wasn't the best example. Alberto Del Rio couldn't adapt to the American style and gosh, his face run was so forced. One of the reasons why it worked for Brock Lesnar is because of the way he was booked. I often times forget guys like Jack Swagger, Alberto Del Rio and Sheamus even held the world championship. Why? I'd leave the answer up to you.
|
|
|
Post by Colter on Oct 16, 2014 21:41:25 GMT -5
That made me laugh a lot tbh
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Oct 16, 2014 22:32:22 GMT -5
im not a fan of a guy winning the WWE Championship within his first 2 years on the active roster and im not counting Husky Harris at all. I feel like the WWE title should be given to guys who EARN it. Not used as a storyline prop to "get someone over" or to "get heel heat" Except Wyatt was rivaling Bryan in overness and is one of the few interesting things about today's product. This is why WWE is the way it is, they don't want to take risks on new people when they could revert back to Cena/Orton. You strike the iron while it's hot, not after it cools. A prime example would be Barrett, and Wyatt. Both white hot, then jobbed out, lost overness and now are probably ruined forever. Once WWE knocks you out of the main event, it's rare you come back.
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Oct 16, 2014 22:46:31 GMT -5
im not a fan of a guy winning the WWE Championship within his first 2 years on the active roster and im not counting Husky Harris at all. I feel like the WWE title should be given to guys who EARN it. Not used as a storyline prop to "get someone over" or to "get heel heat" Except Wyatt was rivaling Bryan in overness and is one of the few interesting things about today's product. This is why WWE is the way it is, they don't want to take risks on new people when they could revert back to Cena/Orton. You strike the iron while it's hot, not after it cools. A prime example would be Barrett, and Wyatt. Both white hot, then jobbed out, lost overness and now are probably ruined forever. Once WWE knocks you out of the main event, it's rare you come back. I don't know if he was rivaling Bryan in overness. Bryan was the most over guy I've seen in a LONG time. Also, while Bray Wyatt was cool and different, I just never felt that special "it" about him. His promos literally rambled for too long and he never seemed to really have a purpose. Why did he want to bring out the monster in Cena? Why did he randomly attack Chris Jericho? Why did he abduct Kane and then Kane just showed up months later? Why did he abduct Daniel Bryan, only to leave him on the side of the road and Bryan was fine the following Monday?
|
|
|
Post by BrIaNMeRcY on Oct 16, 2014 23:39:46 GMT -5
Except Wyatt was rivaling Bryan in overness and is one of the few interesting things about today's product. This is why WWE is the way it is, they don't want to take risks on new people when they could revert back to Cena/Orton. You strike the iron while it's hot, not after it cools. A prime example would be Barrett, and Wyatt. Both white hot, then jobbed out, lost overness and now are probably ruined forever. Once WWE knocks you out of the main event, it's rare you come back. I don't know if he was rivaling Bryan in overness. Bryan was the most over guy I've seen in a LONG time. Also, while Bray Wyatt was cool and different, I just never felt that special "it" about him. His promos literally rambled for too long and he never seemed to really have a purpose. Why did he want to bring out the monster in Cena? Why did he randomly attack Chris Jericho? Why did he abduct Kane and then Kane just showed up months later? Why did he abduct Daniel Bryan, only to leave him on the side of the road and Bryan was fine the following Monday? It is safe we can all agree that Bray Wyatt has been booked like **** on the main roster.
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Oct 17, 2014 0:12:47 GMT -5
Except Wyatt was rivaling Bryan in overness and is one of the few interesting things about today's product. This is why WWE is the way it is, they don't want to take risks on new people when they could revert back to Cena/Orton. You strike the iron while it's hot, not after it cools. A prime example would be Barrett, and Wyatt. Both white hot, then jobbed out, lost overness and now are probably ruined forever. Once WWE knocks you out of the main event, it's rare you come back. I don't know if he was rivaling Bryan in overness. Bryan was the most over guy I've seen in a LONG time. Also, while Bray Wyatt was cool and different, I just never felt that special "it" about him. His promos literally rambled for too long and he never seemed to really have a purpose. Why did he want to bring out the monster in Cena? Why did he randomly attack Chris Jericho? Why did he abduct Kane and then Kane just showed up months later? Why did he abduct Daniel Bryan, only to leave him on the side of the road and Bryan was fine the following Monday? He would have entire arenas singing that silly song, lighting up their phones, and actually got booed like a heel is supposed to before facing Cena. None of those things he has any control over, that's all Vince and creative. They are storyline holes WWE expects people to look past because they think their audience is stupid. And I'm pretty sure he explained the Cena one but I just can't remember what he said, something about changing the kids heroes or something.
|
|
|
Post by King Silva on Oct 17, 2014 3:47:55 GMT -5
I don't think so.
I see the next champions being Reigns and Rollins.
And Reigns will win it at WM 31 so I doubt they will let his first reign be a sh*t reign (unless he gets injured) so if he loses it to Rollins near the end of Rollins' chance to cash in then that would mean Seth's 1st reign would start near June.
Again they should not have Rollins lose so soon but if he was to lose to somebody I would expect it to be back to Reigns, maybe Ambrose, Bryan, or Cena.......
So yeah I really don't see Wyatt winning the sole world title in the next year. Maybe in 2 years or maybe never..
He should start with the US/IC Title because he isn't going to touch the WWE Title for a long time imo.
|
|
|
Post by rustyy on Oct 17, 2014 3:57:37 GMT -5
I don't think so. I see the next champions being Reigns and Rollins. And Reigns will win it at WM 31 so I doubt they will let his first reign be a sh*t reign (unless he gets injured) so if he loses it to Rollins near the end of Rollins' chance to cash in then that would mean Seth's 1st reign would start near June. Again they should not have Rollins lose so soon but if he was to lose to somebody I would expect it to be back to Reigns, maybe Ambrose, Bryan, or Cena....... So yeah I really don't see Wyatt winning the sole world title in the next year. Maybe in 2 years or maybe never.. He should start with the US/IC Title because he isn't going to touch the WWE Title for a long time imo. If he wins the IC or US title at this point they may as well release him. Career killers, both of them.
|
|