Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 21:29:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2014 11:16:19 GMT -5
I feel like Brock was doing the F5 first and then Cena stole it and made it the FU because he started a feud with Brock. But yeah, I'd like to see Cena tell Brock what to do and not to do... haha. Edit: Does anyone know why Cena had to change the name of the "FU" to "Attitude Adjustment" but Michael Cole continuously gets to scream "FIVE KNUCKLE SHUFFLE" on my tv? PG. Five Knuckle Shuffle doesn't seem PG, especially when kids ask their parents what it means. Do you think anyone has ever told John Cena that their Make-A-Wish is to be able to masturbate, just once?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 21:29:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2014 11:51:48 GMT -5
Why would he just bring this up now? Sounds like BS if this is the first time he's saying it.. If he had actually done memorable things in the company it'd be easier to believe but you were a jobber for life.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 21:29:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2014 11:56:46 GMT -5
More like Tyler Rekt.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 21:29:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2014 11:58:23 GMT -5
Five Knuckle Shuffle doesn't seem PG, especially when kids ask their parents what it means. Do you think anyone has ever told John Cena that their Make-A-Wish is to be able to **********, just once?
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Dec 18, 2014 12:02:43 GMT -5
Why would he just bring this up now? Sounds like BS if this is the first time he's saying it.. If he had actually done memorable things in the company it'd be easier to believe but you were a jobber for life. He's said negative things about John Cena before, he was just asked to clarify here.
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Dec 18, 2014 12:06:34 GMT -5
context would be key here.
but if Cena asked the dude to not hit a similar move, and he did it again that's pretty dumb on his part. so maybe Cena thought he was being an bunghole about it. miscommunication more than anything else.
this really is a non-story in the greatest sense.
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Dec 18, 2014 12:18:10 GMT -5
If it is true, I'm pretty sure Brock does whatever the he wants. I feel like Brock was doing the F5 first and then Cena stole it and made it the FU because he started a feud with Brock. But yeah, I'd like to see Cena tell Brock what to do and not to do... haha. Edit: Does anyone know why Cena had to change the name of the "FU" to "Attitude Adjustment" but Michael Cole continuously gets to scream "FIVE KNUCKLE SHUFFLE" on my tv? The FU was created as the alternate of the F5. That statrted in the Cena-Lesnar feud. Cena actually said in a promo " Lesnar, you got the F5, I got the FU!" After that it stuck. The FU then became the AA after WWE went PG.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 21:29:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2014 12:25:09 GMT -5
I feel like Brock was doing the F5 first and then Cena stole it and made it the FU because he started a feud with Brock. But yeah, I'd like to see Cena tell Brock what to do and not to do... haha. Edit: Does anyone know why Cena had to change the name of the "FU" to "Attitude Adjustment" but Michael Cole continuously gets to scream "FIVE KNUCKLE SHUFFLE" on my tv? The FU was created as the alternate of the F5. That statrted in the Cena-Lesnar feud. Cena actually said in a promo " Lesnar, you got the F5, I got the FU!" After that it stuck. The FU then became the AA after WWE went PG. That explains the first part of what you quoted by me, but I want to know why John Cena is still allowed to have the "Five Knuckle Shuffle".
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Dec 18, 2014 12:28:38 GMT -5
The FU was created as the alternate of the F5. That statrted in the Cena-Lesnar feud. Cena actually said in a promo " Lesnar, you got the F5, I got the FU!" After that it stuck. The FU then became the AA after WWE went PG. That explains the first part of what you quoted by me, but I want to know why John Cena is still allowed to have the "Five Knuckle Shuffle". He's always had the Five Knuckle Shuffle. It originated with his WordLife brass knuckles, then just became his signature move leading to the FU/AA.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 21:29:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2014 12:33:55 GMT -5
That explains the first part of what you quoted by me, but I want to know why John Cena is still allowed to have the "Five Knuckle Shuffle". He's always had the Five Knuckle Shuffle. It originated with his WordLife brass knuckles, then just became his signature move leading to the FU/AA. Right, but why hasn't WWE made him change its name to something PG?
|
|
havoc7179
Main Eventer
What is this?
Joined on: Oct 16, 2012 9:11:18 GMT -5
Posts: 4,189
|
Post by havoc7179 on Dec 18, 2014 12:39:28 GMT -5
Yeah. I mean look at Jerry Sandusky. He is an incredibly special individual, who wants to make sure kids are always happy. One bad day lands him in prison. Same goes for Bill Cosby. He just wants to help those women find acting roles, and the friggle fraggles of the mmmbopps and woooobopps. In case you can't tell, that is sarcasm. What one person portrays when the cameras are rolling may be different behind closed doors. Not calling Cena a pedophile or a criminal. I am saying that he's being paid to do these Make a Wish visits, so there's no way of knowing if he is doing this on his own volition. Everyone wants to be liked, and that means doing all sorts of public relations. Behind doors, he may hate this type of stuff.He may very well be a jerk, and to use public relations as sole evidence that he is a good person is not compelling. All it shows is that he does what he is told. You can't compare Cena yelling at a guy once to a ing pedo. Actually I can. Sandusky built a body of work on helping kids. So has Cena. You miss the point. You're saying because Cena does good things with kids, he's a good person. My point is, one good thing does not necessarily mean he's a good person. See Sandusky.
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Dec 18, 2014 12:41:31 GMT -5
He's always had the Five Knuckle Shuffle. It originated with his WordLife brass knuckles, then just became his signature move leading to the FU/AA. Right, but why hasn't WWE made him change its name to something PG? There's no need. The FU literally stood for You! So they changes it to AA ( Attitude Adjustment). 5 Knuckle Shuffle is just another way to say punch to the face. Which is still PG.
|
|
|
Post by BCizzle on Dec 18, 2014 12:47:11 GMT -5
If Cena really blew up about this, he's a psycho. The way he acts on Total Divas he seems to be one. Half robot, half crazy.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 21:29:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2014 12:51:28 GMT -5
Right, but why hasn't WWE made him change its name to something PG? There's no need. The FU literally stood for You! So they changes it to AA ( Attitude Adjustment). 5 Knuckle Shuffle is just another way to say punch to the face. Which is still PG. Umm... No. Five knuckle shuffle is slang for masturbating. Google it. Actually, don't. Actually, google it at your own discretion.
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Dec 18, 2014 12:59:24 GMT -5
There's no need. The FU literally stood for You! So they changes it to AA ( Attitude Adjustment). 5 Knuckle Shuffle is just another way to say punch to the face. Which is still PG. Umm... No. Five knuckle shuffle is slang for masturbating. Google it. Actually, don't. Actually, google it at your own discretion. Hahaha so Powerbomb and Piledriver should be changed for PG then too right?
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 28, 2024 21:29:40 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2014 13:33:12 GMT -5
You can't compare Cena yelling at a guy once to a ing pedo. Actually I can. Sandusky built a body of work on helping kids. So has Cena. You miss the point. You're saying because Cena does good things with kids, he's a good person. My point is, one good thing does not necessarily mean he's a good person. See Sandusky. Guys like Sandusky and Jimmy Saville used their work with children as a mask for their devious activities. This argument is so ridiculous, I won't further reply to such idiotic comparisons.
|
|
|
Post by jayrod2009 on Dec 18, 2014 13:44:12 GMT -5
Actually I can. Sandusky built a body of work on helping kids. So has Cena. You miss the point. You're saying because Cena does good things with kids, he's a good person. My point is, one good thing does not necessarily mean he's a good person. See Sandusky. Guys like Sandusky and Jimmy Saville used their work with children as a mask for their devious activities. This argument is so ridiculous, I won't further reply to such idiotic comparisons. I think this guy writes for The Enquire. Your comparison of a hostile, enragged, ego maniac and a Pedophile are like apples and oranges. To the point were no matter what opinion or statement you ever attemot to throw out again, will be cast into the invalid bin. You might aswell ban yourself!
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Dec 18, 2014 13:58:31 GMT -5
If it is true, I'm pretty sure Brock does whatever the he wants. I feel like Brock was doing the F5 first and then Cena stole it and made it the FU because he started a feud with Brock. But yeah, I'd like to see Cena tell Brock what to do and not to do... haha. Edit: Does anyone know why Cena had to change the name of the "FU" to "Attitude Adjustment" but Michael Cole continuously gets to scream "FIVE KNUCKLE SHUFFLE" on my tv? You're totally right. In fact, Cena almost lost his push at the time because he and Brock had such a terrible match that blew off that feud on a PPV. What I can't stand about changing the name of the finisher is that Michael Cole is really, really bad as an announcer and every time Cena hits it, Cole is all "AA! AA! AA! CENA HIT THE AA!" It's so bad.
|
|
havoc7179
Main Eventer
What is this?
Joined on: Oct 16, 2012 9:11:18 GMT -5
Posts: 4,189
|
Post by havoc7179 on Dec 18, 2014 14:09:53 GMT -5
Guys like Sandusky and Jimmy Saville used their work with children as a mask for their devious activities. This argument is so ridiculous, I won't further reply to such idiotic comparisons. I think this guy writes for The Enquire. Your comparison of a hostile, enragged, ego maniac and a Pedophile are like apples and oranges. To the point were no matter what opinion or statement you ever attemot to throw out again, will be cast into the invalid bin. You might aswell ban yourself! It's only ridiculous because you're looking at what was ultimately discovered. I'm assuming that had the Canadian Who Shall Not Be Named never committed his atrocious acts, you'd be lauding his career. Instead, fans talk of it as "No one would have ever guessed he'd be like that" or "that's not the man I knew. Who knew he hid something so devious?" Same applies here. You don't have to be a pedophile or a murderer or whatever an eragged man is. You can still be a bad person and do good things to mask that. His argument that Cena does one good thing so he must be a good person is a farce. If Cena is going around getting people fired or punished, then he is obviously masking his reputation by performing things that WWE requires him to do. If you think you have to be a murderer or a psychopath to be a bad person, then you see the world in black and white instead of the many shades of gray that exist. I find it comical that the only counter to my point is to dismiss it with an ad hominem attack and straw man argument, which are fallacies, and claim they are ridiculous. But, yet, no one offers a counter point to my point that one good deed does not define a character. Basically though, if we wish to dissect your argument, you're under the belief that there are inherently evil human beings out there who are doing evil things all the time and masking their behavior. How then can you say that Cena is an inherently good person? How do you know he is not masking his behavior? You don't. In years, it may be revealed that he is Mr. Nice Guy who wouldn't hurt a fly, or it may be revealed that he cheated on his girlfriends and was responsible some heinous acts. The point is, you have the luxury of looking at the acts of Sandusky in light of his atrocious acts, so of course you can say its a mask. Here, we have nothing to go on. Yet, people want to hang their hats on the argument that with all the good he does, he cannot be the man we hear about behind the scenes. But of course, you're welcome to dismiss this as ramblings, mostly because you're response--cogent as it was--was akin to "You are an idiot. Cena is God."
|
|
|
Post by Mr Angry Cena on Dec 18, 2014 14:43:26 GMT -5
I think this guy writes for The Enquire. Your comparison of a hostile, enragged, ego maniac and a Pedophile are like apples and oranges. To the point were no matter what opinion or statement you ever attemot to throw out again, will be cast into the invalid bin. You might aswell ban yourself! It's only ridiculous because you're looking at what was ultimately discovered. I'm assuming that had the Canadian Who Shall Not Be Named never committed his atrocious acts, you'd be lauding his career. Instead, fans talk of it as "No one would have ever guessed he'd be like that" or "that's not the man I knew. Who knew he hid something so devious?" Same applies here. You don't have to be a pedophile or a murderer or whatever an eragged man is. You can still be a bad person and do good things to mask that. His argument that Cena does one good thing so he must be a good person is a farce. If Cena is going around getting people fired or punished, then he is obviously masking his reputation by performing things that WWE requires him to do. If you think you have to be a murderer or a psychopath to be a bad person, then you see the world in black and white instead of the many shades of gray that exist. I find it comical that the only counter to my point is to dismiss it with an ad hominem attack and straw man argument, which are fallacies, and claim they are ridiculous. But, yet, no one offers a counter point to my point that one good deed does not define a character. Basically though, if we wish to dissect your argument, you're under the belief that there are inherently evil human beings out there who are doing evil things all the time and masking their behavior. How then can you say that Cena is an inherently good person? How do you know he is not masking his behavior? You don't. In years, it may be revealed that he is Mr. Nice Guy who wouldn't hurt a fly, or it may be revealed that he cheated on his girlfriends and was responsible some heinous acts. The point is, you have the luxury of looking at the acts of Sandusky in light of his atrocious acts, so of course you can say its a mask. Here, we have nothing to go on. Yet, people want to hang their hats on the argument that with all the good he does, he cannot be the man we hear about behind the scenes. But of course, you're welcome to dismiss this as ramblings, mostly because you're response--cogent as it was--was akin to "You are an idiot. Cena is God."
|
|