|
Post by Joey Cush on Aug 17, 2015 19:54:39 GMT -5
At Summer Slam, Ambrose will turn on Reigns in what will be said to be
"The most surprising turn in WWE History"
- (most likely) Michael Cole
Am I right or nah?
|
|
|
Post by Yayo on Aug 17, 2015 19:59:05 GMT -5
Or Reigns will turn
Which I doubt, but would prefer
|
|
|
Post by ~ Cymru ~ on Aug 17, 2015 20:02:01 GMT -5
I think WWE need to play to the Reigns haters hate, people who like Reigns are more likely to dislike him if he turns on all round fan favourite dean Ambrose. Get everyone on the same page before making him face again. That way when he does turn face again people should all start liking him
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Aug 17, 2015 20:54:26 GMT -5
I hope not. Ambrose would have to do something extremely dire to get the fans to boo him and cheer Reigns.
If Ambrose turns, I see it playing out like when Daniel Bryan joined Wyatt. The fans wouldn't accept it, it'd end after a month, and we'd be right back to where we started with no one involved having anything to do.
Meltzer reported that the IWC would be upset over who the next Wyatt member would be. People have speculated Ambrose and Bo...but I think it's going to be Kane.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 15:37:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2015 20:55:08 GMT -5
If he did, I wouldn't blame him. I'm not buying Roman's duck face winks.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Aug 17, 2015 21:32:20 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 15:37:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2015 21:34:46 GMT -5
Knowing WWE, those two will never turn on one another. I'm still waiting for Dean to surprise Reigns with a commitment ring.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 15:37:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2015 21:35:56 GMT -5
I think so. Been calling it for awhile now
|
|
RV F'N D
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 13, 2012 21:34:37 GMT -5
Posts: 4,046
|
Post by RV F'N D on Aug 17, 2015 21:39:47 GMT -5
Ugh...really hope not. Not saying you may not be onto something, just that I don't see that scenario helping anybody.
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Aug 17, 2015 21:55:09 GMT -5
Dean will probably turn on Roman about six months after anybody gives a crap about it cause they had been hinting at it for so long.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Aug 17, 2015 22:32:03 GMT -5
I really want a (heel) Ambrose to feud with Daniel Bryan going into WM.
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Aug 17, 2015 22:52:58 GMT -5
Yup
|
|
|
Post by The Kevstaaa on Aug 17, 2015 22:54:47 GMT -5
Yes.
Then he jobs to Roman for three months.
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Aug 17, 2015 23:15:20 GMT -5
OH HELL YEAH!!!
But really I hope they don't cause why the hell would dean want to side with bray after all the history they have of hate for each other
|
|
|
Post by Todd Pettengill on Aug 17, 2015 23:15:51 GMT -5
I truly hope Reigns turns. It could bring new life to him.
|
|
|
Post by Rob on Aug 17, 2015 23:16:35 GMT -5
Ambrose will get cheered if he attacks Reigns.
But this will be WWE's way of trying to force feed you into cheering for Reigns. If both his partners are heel, You dont have a choice in the matter.
|
|
|
Post by The Constable on Aug 17, 2015 23:21:07 GMT -5
i think reigns would turn on ambrose... ambrose is too much of a fan fan favorite
but personally i thought that would have happened sooner like at MITB reigns turns on ambrose and joins rollins and the authority
but at the same time a heel ambrose might boost him a WWE championchip opertunity
|
|
Miztery
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 30, 2014 0:16:59 GMT -5
Posts: 892
|
Post by Miztery on Aug 17, 2015 23:32:29 GMT -5
Ambrose will get cheered if he attacks Reigns. But this will be WWE's way of trying to force feed you into cheering for Reigns. If both his partners are heel, You dont have a choice in the matter. F*ck what they want. I'm cheering for Dean F*cking Ambrose no matter what.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 25, 2024 15:37:59 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2015 23:34:37 GMT -5
I don't see the point of either one turning heel.
|
|
|
Post by The Constable on Aug 17, 2015 23:51:59 GMT -5
^ exactly
|
|