Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 1:18:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2015 23:34:31 GMT -5
After the travesty that was WM 31, Sting simply cannot lose again. I can't even imagine he'd agree to that... Then again I was surprised he agreed with the finish to WM 30.
And I don't even want WWE to do their BS to where they somehow protect both guys... Sting just needs to win cleanly. Thoughts?
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Aug 26, 2015 23:39:35 GMT -5
Uhh... no.
Seth Rollins needs to win cleanly because he has yet to have a clean title defense and he's not a 50 year old man on his retirement tour.
|
|
Miztery
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 30, 2014 0:16:59 GMT -5
Posts: 892
|
Post by Miztery on Aug 26, 2015 23:43:12 GMT -5
I don't know if Sting really cares about wins and losses at this point. He's getting paid huge dollars to sit at home most of the time. I wouldn't even mind Sting winning because I want Rollins championship reign to end. They've booked it absolutely horribly and I want his character to get as far away from the Authority as possible. Is it too much to ask for there to be no Authority storyline at all?
EDIT: Only if Sheamus cashes in successfully.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 1:18:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2015 23:43:57 GMT -5
I've been a sting fan for 25 years. No. He does not need to win.
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Aug 26, 2015 23:44:21 GMT -5
I don't know if Sting really cares about wins and losses at this point. He's getting paid huge dollars to sit at home most of the time. I wouldn't even mind Sting winning because I want Rollins championship reign to end. They've booked it absolutely horribly and I want his character to get as far away from the Authority as possible. Is it too much to ask for there to be no Authority storyline at all? EDIT: Only if Sheamus cashes in successfully. There's been an evil Authority figure for the past 18 years. At this point, I think it might be too much to ask.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 1:18:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2015 0:00:28 GMT -5
I'm on his side. I don't think Sting NEEDS to win it, but I sure would love to see it happen!
|
|
|
Post by JHTB® on Aug 27, 2015 0:18:52 GMT -5
I'd love to see Sting win. Maybe have him carry the title till the next PPV or have Sheamus cash in right away so we can at least say that Sting was the WWE WHC at one point.
|
|
|
Post by RybackV1 on Aug 27, 2015 0:36:30 GMT -5
Yup. If anyone should beat Rollins for the belt , it's Sting. Not only would it make Sting look great In return for his mania loss , but even Rollins wouldn't look as weak if he were to lose to a legend such as sting (compared to someone like reigns or Cena )
Give us a Hogan 02 style sting title reign , have him drop it to whomever, and we can work our way to mania from there.
|
|
DestroyerOfNations
Main Eventer
WF 10+ Year Member
Joined on: Nov 29, 2011 18:39:50 GMT -5
Posts: 2,855
|
Post by DestroyerOfNations on Aug 27, 2015 0:47:13 GMT -5
I love Seth Rollins but as fan I wanna see Sting win. And I really don't wanna see any MitB cash in's during the match. Sheamus should not be anywhere near Sting. Give Sting the belt, let him hold on to it for 1-3 months. I really don't think he would have a problem with being on every Raw and wrestling on TV during his reign. Even if he loses it back to Rollins the next PPV.
|
|
|
Post by Ember's Flame on Aug 27, 2015 0:49:17 GMT -5
In favor of him winning it for selfish reasons, although I don't think it will.
|
|
|
Post by The Constable on Aug 27, 2015 1:20:52 GMT -5
I don't think he will win
Even though I want him too badly
|
|
hammer
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 12, 2009 2:30:31 GMT -5
Posts: 2,619
|
Post by hammer on Aug 27, 2015 1:57:47 GMT -5
no. rollins cant lose. rollins shouldnt lose to anyone not named bryan, ambrose or [gulp...] reigns.
and sheamus should fail at cashing in mitb, just to give it the illusion that its possible.
|
|
torriefan4life
Superstar
Joined on: Mar 9, 2012 13:27:48 GMT -5
Posts: 812
|
Post by torriefan4life on Aug 27, 2015 2:04:14 GMT -5
You know WWE is entertainment and wrestling is where anything is supposed to be able to happen. I don't care about age, I want to be entertained as a long time fan and I believe that Sting should win at NOC.
Maybe he can have like a 1 month title run, but he should win IMO, and no harm would be done. Title reigns don't have to last 9 months to a year every time now, so I think WWE needs to have Sting win to give the product something new for a while. Because if Sting loses all that does is set up Rollins for another feud with Cena, weakens Sting's name value even more, and just puts WWE back on the same track it has been on since WrestleMania.
I just think having Sting be a 1 or 2 month champion would be great and Rollins can beat him back clean or dirty, but that way Sting, Rollins, WWE, and a lot of fans benefit from Sting's return.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 1:18:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2015 2:05:39 GMT -5
no. rollins cant lose. rollins shouldnt lose to anyone not named bryan, ambrose or [gulp...] reigns. and sheamus should fail at cashing in mitb, just to give it the illusion that its possible.
|
|
Mr Wrestling Jr.
Main Eventer
Joined on: Sept 6, 2010 7:07:35 GMT -5
Posts: 3,410
|
Post by Mr Wrestling Jr. on Aug 27, 2015 2:24:10 GMT -5
I'd be up for Sting to have a reign until Royal Rumble. Not stretch it out to Mania.
|
|
hammer
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 12, 2009 2:30:31 GMT -5
Posts: 2,619
|
Post by hammer on Aug 27, 2015 2:28:28 GMT -5
no. rollins cant lose. rollins shouldnt lose to anyone not named bryan, ambrose or [gulp...] reigns. and sheamus should fail at cashing in mitb, just to give it the illusion that its possible.yes, i remember when both of those happened. the mitb case is still pushed as "a guarantee" however. it should start to be pushed as "a superb opportunity", instead.
|
|
hammer
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 12, 2009 2:30:31 GMT -5
Posts: 2,619
|
Post by hammer on Aug 27, 2015 2:31:16 GMT -5
i didnt look at the cena picture close enough, but cena also got a dq win [or loss, i dont remember honestly], on a mitb contract opportunity, and didnt win the belt. thus... "the both of those". my point was, more people should fail at cashing in mitb. and sheamus is the perfect vehicle for that, because him winning the belt just doesnt fit right now... and im not sure how theyll make it fit.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 1:18:10 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 27, 2015 2:34:56 GMT -5
Sting should win.
|
|
|
Post by The Constable on Aug 27, 2015 4:10:28 GMT -5
no. rollins cant lose. rollins shouldnt lose to anyone not named bryan, ambrose or [gulp...] reigns. and sheamus should fail at cashing in mitb, just to give it the illusion that its possible.Cena also fail a MITB cash in too (Raw 1000)
|
|
|
Post by Duck Holliday on Aug 27, 2015 5:17:27 GMT -5
Eh.... The thing is, he should have won at WM... then lose to Rollins at NOC or if they planned it, SS so the WWE/Authority could have its redemption.
|
|