|
Post by SteveHulk on Sept 24, 2015 4:14:27 GMT -5
Wow these are bad. And no offense, but why even post the Hogan picture if he isn't going to be available? Seems pointless. Exactly. There was no reason to post the Hogan pic. I don't get it. ...Bill probably told him to, to mess with us... Forgive me but aren't Mattel a toy company, predominantly. For kids? Why do these get people's backs up? Don't buy em for goodness sake I know... I mean, it's almost as if Mattel are making these... for kids!? Crazy.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 20, 2024 8:07:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2015 4:18:57 GMT -5
A figure line is pretty bad when I can't even tell who some of the guys are supposed to be..... Which ones didn't you recognise?
|
|
muuk76
Superstar
UK Flashback Collector.
Joined on: Apr 21, 2015 12:10:52 GMT -5
Posts: 992
|
Post by muuk76 on Sept 24, 2015 4:39:26 GMT -5
I wouldn't wipe my proverbial with these lol.
|
|
|
Post by Flair Forever on Sept 24, 2015 5:23:31 GMT -5
A figure line is pretty bad when I can't even tell who some of the guys are supposed to be..... Which ones didn't you recognise? At first I thought this was a really strange Ric Flair, but then noticed the beard - but if this is supposed to be Daniel Bryan, then why even bother.... And who is the second one? Great Khali? Or Rusev? The attire doesn't look like either one....
|
|
|
Post by POOR-ly Cuyler on Sept 24, 2015 6:41:36 GMT -5
ChicagoLostHawk05Ill try and be grossly specific next time. These things, and they even have shoulder joints...
|
|
|
Post by fzmadness on Sept 24, 2015 7:35:41 GMT -5
These look horrible. When did Rusev wear toe shoes and wear shorts? I had no idea that was Daniel Bryan. lol
|
|
|
Post by "The Perfect Ten" Mizard on Sept 24, 2015 8:55:15 GMT -5
That Rusev figure maybe the was worse wrestling figure I've ever seen in my life (that's not bootleg). They are awful.
|
|
|
Post by micco on Sept 24, 2015 10:22:55 GMT -5
Forgive me but aren't Mattel a toy company, predominantly. For kids? Why do these get people's backs up? Don't buy em for goodness sake You think kids are gonna buy these? If they're a dollar each maybe, otherwise I think these will be mattels biggest failure to date.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 20, 2024 8:07:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2015 10:23:52 GMT -5
Forgive me but aren't Mattel a toy company, predominantly. For kids? Why do these get people's backs up? Don't buy em for goodness sake You think kids are gonna buy these? If they're a dollar each maybe, otherwise I think these will be mattels biggest failure to date. Yes I do, they are almost identical to imaginext, which is a MASSIVE seller for fisher price
|
|
wwetna2008
Main Eventer
Austin 3:16 says I just whooped your @$$
Joined on: Feb 14, 2009 13:55:52 GMT -5
Posts: 1,371
|
Post by wwetna2008 on Sept 24, 2015 10:26:20 GMT -5
Generic Rumblers
|
|
|
Post by Yambag Jones on Sept 24, 2015 10:35:04 GMT -5
Who is that guy in yellow with the red bandana?
|
|
|
Post by micco on Sept 24, 2015 10:38:32 GMT -5
You think kids are gonna buy these? If they're a dollar each maybe, otherwise I think these will be mattels biggest failure to date. Yes I do, they are almost identical to imaginext, which is a MASSIVE seller for fisher price In my opinion, these look way worse than those. They have lots of elaborate play sets for the imaginext toys and they aren't sold in blind bags. Also, they're target demographic is younger than wwe's audience. I don't think there's much in common between the two.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 20, 2024 8:07:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2015 10:41:40 GMT -5
Yes I do, they are almost identical to imaginext, which is a MASSIVE seller for fisher price In my opinion, these look way worse than those. They have lots of elaborate play sets for the imaginext toys and they aren't sold in blind bags. Also, they're target demographic is younger than wwe's audience. I don't think there's much in common between the two. We don't know if we're getting playsets for them though. And as for the age group, imagineers now make power rangers, I'd say that's pretty close to the general WWE age group. I would bet there are more WWE fans between the ages of 6-10 than any other which i assume power rangers appeals to
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 20, 2024 8:07:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2015 10:50:57 GMT -5
I recognised everyone immediately.
They're pretty cool.
|
|
|
Post by micco on Sept 24, 2015 13:23:11 GMT -5
In my opinion, these look way worse than those. They have lots of elaborate play sets for the imaginext toys and they aren't sold in blind bags. Also, they're target demographic is younger than wwe's audience. I don't think there's much in common between the two. We don't know if we're getting playsets for them though. And as for the age group, imagineers now make power rangers, I'd say that's pretty close to the general WWE age group. I would bet there are more WWE fans between the ages of 6-10 than any other which i assume power rangers appeals to That is very incorrect. Wwe's biggest audience is actually the over 50 crowd. 24% of their audience is age 17 and younger. The other 76% is age 18 and over.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 20, 2024 8:07:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2015 14:10:00 GMT -5
We don't know if we're getting playsets for them though. And as for the age group, imagineers now make power rangers, I'd say that's pretty close to the general WWE age group. I would bet there are more WWE fans between the ages of 6-10 than any other which i assume power rangers appeals to That is very incorrect. Wwe's biggest audience is actually the over 50 crowd. 24% of their audience is age 17 and younger. The other 76% is age 18 and over. Ok I'll rephrase my point. The WWE toy market, my bad
|
|
|
Post by Bandalero on Sept 24, 2015 14:28:38 GMT -5
stop... This ISN'T the Great Khali?
|
|
|
Post by Stoker Ichikawa on Sept 24, 2015 15:24:37 GMT -5
I have a few rumblers
I shan't be getting any of these
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: May 20, 2024 8:07:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 24, 2015 15:50:03 GMT -5
stop... This ISN'T the Great Khali? It may have been had the year been 2011 or so
|
|
|
Post by Mr. #1derful π΅πΈ on Sept 24, 2015 15:54:24 GMT -5
|
|