Spoder Juan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 18, 2011 21:36:12 GMT -5
Posts: 1,367
|
Post by Spoder Juan on Jun 24, 2016 15:30:44 GMT -5
Can we please not have 24 PPVS, give each match on the card some damn meaning.
|
|
|
Post by dannybosa on Jun 24, 2016 21:20:46 GMT -5
Just as long as they have different sets each ppv...
|
|
|
Post by Nick the Quick on Jun 25, 2016 0:27:37 GMT -5
Have they forgotten how well brand exclusive PPV's worked out the last time they had them. Not too many of them were good and some, especially on the Smackdown side, were nearly unwatchable. I won't trash the idea and give it a chance, but I'm not getting my hopes up as far as this being successful goes.
|
|
|
Post by Sleazyness on Jun 25, 2016 4:30:09 GMT -5
Too. Many. PPVs.
|
|
|
Post by ZMaster on Jun 25, 2016 6:57:11 GMT -5
Seems like too many. Brand PPVs didn't work the first time around, what makes them think it will be different?
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Jun 25, 2016 19:13:07 GMT -5
Have they forgotten how well brand exclusive PPV's worked out the last time they had them. Not too many of them were good and some, especially on the Smackdown side, were nearly unwatchable. I won't trash the idea and give it a chance, but I'm not getting my hopes up as far as this being successful goes. Also they didn't end for nothing which speaks for itself. When I think of brand PPV's matches like Hardcore Holly vs Mordecia and Billy Gunn vs Kenzo Suzuki come to mind. Thinking back I don't remember 1 decent GAB PPV which were all Smackdown.
|
|
Spoder Juan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 18, 2011 21:36:12 GMT -5
Posts: 1,367
|
Post by Spoder Juan on Jun 26, 2016 7:51:47 GMT -5
Have they forgotten how well brand exclusive PPV's worked out the last time they had them. Not too many of them were good and some, especially on the Smackdown side, were nearly unwatchable. I won't trash the idea and give it a chance, but I'm not getting my hopes up as far as this being successful goes. Also they didn't end for nothing which speaks for itself. When I think of brand PPV's matches like Hardcore Holly vs Mordecia and Billy Gunn vs Kenzo Suzuki come to mind. Thinking back I don't remember 1 decent GAB PPV which were all Smackdown. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_American_Bash_(2005)
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Jun 26, 2016 8:00:40 GMT -5
Also they didn't end for nothing which speaks for itself. When I think of brand PPV's matches like Hardcore Holly vs Mordecia and Billy Gunn vs Kenzo Suzuki come to mind. Thinking back I don't remember 1 decent GAB PPV which were all Smackdown. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_American_Bash_(2005)Never liked that one. You also brought back horrible memories of the Rey Mysterio and Eddie Guerrero custody storyline.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 26, 2024 7:52:01 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 26, 2016 8:42:36 GMT -5
Also they didn't end for nothing which speaks for itself. When I think of brand PPV's matches like Hardcore Holly vs Mordecia and Billy Gunn vs Kenzo Suzuki come to mind. Thinking back I don't remember 1 decent GAB PPV which were all Smackdown. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_American_Bash_(2005)Muhammad Hassan. Now there's a name I haven't heard in a long time.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Jun 26, 2016 9:06:25 GMT -5
As much as I'm a fan of bringing back some of the old names (e.g. No Mercy, Backlash), I'm completely against the Raw and Smackdown Exclusive PPV's. Just have 11/12 PPV's a year, with the best four Feuds from each Brand taking place at the following PPV. That way, all PPV's would be really, really solid with a lot to look forward too.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jun 26, 2016 10:27:45 GMT -5
I honestly don't see the issue.
Just cause WWE has 15 pay per views a year doesn't mean you have to watch 15 a year. You're not forced to watch em all. With the way the network is set up, you could skip them occasionally and wait till you hear feedback to see if it's worth going back and watching later. Or just wait till Monday and only watch the match or two that you really want to see. Skip over the stuff that doesn't interest you. Seems like a no brainer IMO.
Plus extra shows means more bang for your buck. We should be rejoicing not bellyaching.
|
|
|
Post by LostHawk05 on Jun 26, 2016 10:54:40 GMT -5
I honestly don't see the issue. Just cause WWE has 15 pay per views a year doesn't mean you have to watch 15 a year. You're not forced to watch em all. With the way the network is set up, you could skip them occasionally and wait till you hear feedback to see if it's worth going back and watching later. Or just wait till Monday and only watch the match or two that you really want to see. Skip over the stuff that doesn't interest you. Seems like a no brainer IMO. Plus extra shows means more bang for your buck. We should be rejoicing not bellyaching. This. It'd be one thing if WWE was expecting us to pay $60 + per PPV but with the Network this is the perfect time to expand their live special schedule. Watch what you want, fast forward what you don't.
|
|
|
Post by The Natural Eddy Valintino on Jun 26, 2016 11:15:14 GMT -5
I honestly don't see the issue. Just cause WWE has 15 pay per views a year doesn't mean you have to watch 15 a year. You're not forced to watch em all. With the way the network is set up, you could skip them occasionally and wait till you hear feedback to see if it's worth going back and watching later. Or just wait till Monday and only watch the match or two that you really want to see. Skip over the stuff that doesn't interest you. Seems like a no brainer IMO. Plus extra shows means more bang for your buck. We should be rejoicing not bellyaching. I agree. Personally, i would watch all of them live, mostly cause i barely have plans Sundays, and it gives me a reason to spend more time with my dad
|
|
|
Post by #DI-WHY? on Jun 26, 2016 12:02:41 GMT -5
The fact that there's going to be weeks with 10+ HOURS of live wrestling is....
I don't even know...
|
|
|
Post by ZDB on Jun 26, 2016 13:59:02 GMT -5
I honestly don't see the issue. Just cause WWE has 15 pay per views a year doesn't mean you have to watch 15 a year. You're not forced to watch em all. With the way the network is set up, you could skip them occasionally and wait till you hear feedback to see if it's worth going back and watching later. Or just wait till Monday and only watch the match or two that you really want to see. Skip over the stuff that doesn't interest you. Seems like a no brainer IMO. Plus extra shows means more bang for your buck. We should be rejoicing not bellyaching. I disagree with the last part Quality > quantity my dude
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jun 26, 2016 14:01:15 GMT -5
I honestly don't see the issue. Just cause WWE has 15 pay per views a year doesn't mean you have to watch 15 a year. You're not forced to watch em all. With the way the network is set up, you could skip them occasionally and wait till you hear feedback to see if it's worth going back and watching later. Or just wait till Monday and only watch the match or two that you really want to see. Skip over the stuff that doesn't interest you. Seems like a no brainer IMO. Plus extra shows means more bang for your buck. We should be rejoicing not bellyaching. I disagree with the last part Quality > quantity my dude I can't comment on the quality because it hasn't happened yet. I will judge that after the event, not before.
|
|
Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD
Main Eventer
I need a monster condom for my magnum sized dong.
Joined on: Nov 25, 2011 16:25:54 GMT -5
Posts: 4,713
|
Post by Dr. Mantis Toboggan MD on Jun 26, 2016 14:27:28 GMT -5
O-ver-sat-ur-ation times come on!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Todd Pettengill on Jun 26, 2016 17:06:51 GMT -5
So I guess this is a legit leak seeing as how Ticketmaster has the show listed as "Clash of Champions".
|
|
Spoder Juan
Main Eventer
Joined on: Oct 18, 2011 21:36:12 GMT -5
Posts: 1,367
|
Post by Spoder Juan on Jun 26, 2016 17:43:39 GMT -5
Never liked that one. You also brought back horrible memories of the Rey Mysterio and Eddie Guerrero custody storyline. Yeah that was rough to watch
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Jun 26, 2016 22:36:58 GMT -5
Can we please not have 24 PPVS, give each match on the card some damn meaning. Splitting hairs here but it would be 20 PPV's, 8 months where there would be two shows and 4 with one show (Rumble, Mania, Summerslam, Survivor Series). From how I interpreted it anyways. Still way too many.
|
|