|
Post by MADNESS_NH_97 on Jun 28, 2016 12:19:44 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by J'Dinkalage Morgoone on Jun 28, 2016 16:25:00 GMT -5
ITs really grainy, also dont care for the guy man and dude lol
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Mar 29, 2024 1:25:25 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 28, 2016 18:50:18 GMT -5
It's a good concept, but it just feels a little low resolution. I get that it's supposed to have that classic feel of the poster it's based on, but I don' think it works as well.
|
|
|
Post by MADNESS_NH_97 on Jun 29, 2016 3:34:43 GMT -5
It's a good concept, but it just feels a little low resolution. I get that it's supposed to have that classic feel of the poster it's based on, but I don' think it works as well. The resolution isn't low at all.
|
|
|
Post by Valbroski on Jun 29, 2016 11:22:28 GMT -5
It's a good concept, but it just feels a little low resolution. I get that it's supposed to have that classic feel of the poster it's based on, but I don' think it works as well. The resolution isn't low at all. I think he was referring to the quality of the renders you used which do look either low or possibly over sharpened. Overall its not bad I guess, you can't really critique this without critiquing the original. I personally don't care for the style of the original. Too much positive space imo but at least theres contrast with red on white. On yours I'd scrap the watermarks, 4 seems excessive. Plus the font for the watermark is bigger than the font you used for the names so that takes away hierarchy(importance) from the names, visually speaking. I also can't make out what the transparent shape overlapping the renders is supposed to be. I assumed it was another watermark and if thats the case I'd scrap it completely because its unnecessary. Other than that I can't see its intention but if I'm wrong please correct me. Overall, pretty cut and dry accomplished what you were shooting for. All I'd say thats necessary to change to improve on it is using better quality renders and scrapping the watermarks or at least just using one then making the size of it smaller.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Jul 21, 2016 11:01:32 GMT -5
it's a good idea that could've been executed better as an actual event poster. Keep the Good, The Bad and The Ugly idea, put World Wrestling Emtertainment at the top where you have it just saying Battleground and have the actual Battleground logo on the bottom of the poster. I also didn't really like that The Guy font was under Ambrose and The Dude font was under Reigns.
|
|
|
Post by MADNESS_NH_97 on Jul 27, 2016 12:40:06 GMT -5
it's a good idea that could've been executed better as an actual event poster. Keep the Good, The Bad and The Ugly idea, put World Wrestling Emtertainment at the top where you have it just saying Battleground and have the actual Battleground logo on the bottom of the poster. I also didn't really like that The Guy font was under Ambrose and The Dude font was under Reigns.It's supposed to be like that. Seth Rollins was in place of Clint Eastwood "The Good", Roman Reigns was in place of Lee Van Cleef "The Bad" & Dean Ambrose in place of Eli Wallach "The Ugly"
|
|
|
Post by MADNESS_NH_97 on Jul 27, 2016 13:04:25 GMT -5
The resolution isn't low at all. I think he was referring to the quality of the renders you used which do look either low or possibly over sharpened. Overall its not bad I guess, you can't really critique this without critiquing the original. I personally don't care for the style of the original. Too much positive space imo but at least theres contrast with red on white. On yours I'd scrap the watermarks, 4 seems excessive. Plus the font for the watermark is bigger than the font you used for the names so that takes away hierarchy(importance) from the names, visually speaking. I also can't make out what the transparent shape overlapping the renders is supposed to be. I assumed it was another watermark and if thats the case I'd scrap it completely because its unnecessary. Other than that I can't see its intention but if I'm wrong please correct me. Overall, pretty cut and dry accomplished what you were shooting for. All I'd say thats necessary to change to improve on it is using better quality renders and scrapping the watermarks or at least just using one then making the size of it smaller. I used a sharpness filter on the Renders. Regarding the Watermark. It's a monogram made out of "N" & "H". And I made it that big because of the poster is white. And instead of making several small all over the Poster I just made one big.
|
|
|
Post by Mr. PerpetuaLynch Motion on Jul 27, 2016 13:19:12 GMT -5
it's a good idea that could've been executed better as an actual event poster. Keep the Good, The Bad and The Ugly idea, put World Wrestling Emtertainment at the top where you have it just saying Battleground and have the actual Battleground logo on the bottom of the poster. I also didn't really like that The Guy font was under Ambrose and The Dude font was under Reigns.It's supposed to be like that. Seth Rollins was in place of Clint Eastwood "The Good", Roman Reigns was in place of Lee Van Cleef "The Bad" & Dean Ambrose in place of Eli Wallach "The Ugly" I understand what the original poster looks like, it's one of my favourite movie posters. I'm saying that for a poster it doesn't make sense for the nicknames or whatever to be under the wrong person. You could have easily just put "The Guy" and "The Dude" under the right person and still have the same effect.
|
|