ššµšāļø
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
King Of The Ring 2007 - Team Undisputed
Joined on: Feb 4, 2013 13:46:47 GMT -5
Posts: 4,673
|
Post by ššµšāļø on Jul 25, 2016 9:15:55 GMT -5
On one hand, the Undisputed WWE World Heavyweight Championship Title could gain more prestige, as being the top number one richest prize in Professional Sports Wrestling Entertainment today. In this case, Dean Ambrose should have been excluded from the 2016 WWE Draft. As a matter of fact, all of the Champions should have been excluded. The WWE World Heavyweight Champion could and should cross both brands and both shows, main eventing Pay Per Views monthly. After all, the WWE World Heavyweight Champion is the face and flag bearer of the company.
Hereās an example. At SummerSlam, Dean Ambrose can defend the WWE World Heavyweight Championship Title Belt against a Raw and a Smackdown SuperStar. At Backlash, Dean can defend the WWE Championship against Smackdownās number one contender. At Clash Of Champions, Ambrose can defend the World Heavyweight Championship against Rawās number one contender. This way, feuds wouldnāt get stale so fast, as well as having fresh matchups for the Champion on a regular basis. During the period where one brandās number one contender gets the Title shot, the other brandās SuperStars could be having matches to determine the next number one contender.
On the other hand, Iāll have something new to buy!! Forget what I just said above, I want a new Championship Title Belt!!
|
|
mutafan
Superstar
Joined on: Aug 2, 2005 15:06:54 GMT -5
Posts: 756
|
Post by mutafan on Jul 25, 2016 9:21:54 GMT -5
why cant since rollins and reigns lost last night why cant they move on to other talent. Raw does not have to be about those 2 hell there is better talent on there anyways good wrestling talent
|
|
|
Post by PJ on Jul 25, 2016 9:28:10 GMT -5
They tried having one champion for both shows originally when they did the brand extension and look how that turned out. I full expect them to bring back the World Championship tonight and decide that champion at Summer Slam. Notice how they stopped reffering to Dean as WWE World Heavyweight Champion and just as WWE Champion instead? Still they need the champions being on both brands. Look at the Draft...Raw chose the Woman's champion and tag team champions. So what was the point of SD grabbing any tag teams or female wrestlers? They have no Championships on SD to compete for. While the tag team division hasn't been anything to write home about in years I felt drafting Becky to SD was a total waste of her talent. Sure her and Natalia can have great matches, but for what? They have no title on SD to compete for. Now they will have split the WWE World Heavywight Championship, Woman's Championship and Tag Team Championship so both brands will have meaningful titles to compete for. They did that before and there were to many titles then. So without having the champions competing on both shows they will have to split the titles again where two of the three were just unified within the last 2 years.
|
|
|
Post by marino13 on Jul 25, 2016 9:31:53 GMT -5
I'd have Roman disposed of (moved onto his next feud). Stephanie & Mick are about to reward Seth with the new World title. Much like Bischoff did with Hunter all those years ago. Right before she can officially reward him with it... the lights go out, and Balor's music hits. Show ends with a stare down between the two.
Next week Foley convinces Steph that they should have a match as opposed to just handing it over. Rollins is naturally upset. But the RAW main event for SummerSlam is Balor vs Rollins for the new RAW World championship.
|
|
Miztery
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 30, 2014 0:16:59 GMT -5
Posts: 892
|
Post by Miztery on Jul 25, 2016 9:33:13 GMT -5
People say the reason the brand split failed is because of constant cross overs. Now here they are b*tching for the champion and his contenders to constantly be on both shows. The whole point of the brand split is to build up to unique matches you don't get to see often. The more that happens the less special future matchups will be. Then if Ambrose only feuds with Cena or Styles RAW won't have a main event title picture. Which automatically screams B show. Separate shows, separate belts.
|
|
|
Post by dannybosa on Jul 25, 2016 9:39:14 GMT -5
Introduce the title, screw a rollins and reigns match at summerslam. Do a battle royal for it and that's it. Not that hard.
|
|
KingOfKingsā¢
Main Eventer
Running to get a piece of some Alexa Bliss cake
Joined on: Jul 22, 2016 20:04:38 GMT -5
Posts: 1,594
|
Post by KingOfKingsā¢ on Jul 25, 2016 9:53:17 GMT -5
Introduce the title, screw a rollins and reigns match at summerslam. Do a battle royal for it and that's it. Not that hard. I would rather see a battle royal rather than Reigns/Rollins being put in the title picture automatically. But knowing WWE the final 2 competitors are most likely gonna be them two.
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Jul 25, 2016 10:03:32 GMT -5
Having 2 titles completely trashes the world championship.
Being the champion of WWE is far more supreme than being the champion of a show.
|
|
johnnyaustin21
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 21, 2011 14:16:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,609
|
Post by johnnyaustin21 on Jul 25, 2016 10:37:50 GMT -5
Having a secondary World Title isn't and issue at all.Know matter what you call it the WWE Title will always be THE TITLE.This issues with both the WWE and World Title before the unification match back a few years ago where that their was to many title changes and to many guys getting World Title runs that never should have sniffed the title i.e. Kahli,Swagger,Henry...ect and guys like Cena,Orton and Edge winning way to many of them.Once the 2nd World Title gets brought in in needs to be treated in a much better light and have lengthly title reigns.
The two options I would have in bring in a new title for RAW is to set up Reigns/Rollins for the title at SummerSlam or do a battle royal tonight.Whoever get to be the 1st World Champion needs to hold the title at the very least for the rest of the year.
Ideally for me Rollins or a heel turned Reigns would be the 1st champion and you would have a long build until next years WM where you have Rollins/Balor for the title.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 8:31:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2016 10:49:19 GMT -5
Ok not that I'm not tired or just waking up, I say Tournament for the number 1 contendership Steph places Roman at the beginning because he dun ed up and that's his punishment yada yada and he got pinned The tournament will culminate at Summerslam with the final 4 at Summerslam, Balor, Reigns, Rollins and Cesaro. Rollins v Balor and Cesaro v Reigns. They kick off Summerslam and then Rollins and Reigns in the Main event for the new WWE title. Rollins wins overall. This gives Balor and Cesaro something to do because they need it. The whole time you can have the Club stuff going on too. Maybe have a Balor heel turn and make Cesaro like Punk esque heel.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 8:31:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2016 10:50:29 GMT -5
Having a secondary World Title isn't and issue at all.Know matter what you call it the WWE Title will always be THE TITLE.This issues with both the WWE and World Title before the unification match back a few years ago where that their was to many title changes and to many guys getting World Title runs that never should have sniffed the title i.e. Kahli,Swagger,Henry...ect and guys like Cena,Orton and Edge winning way to many of them.Once the 2nd World Title gets brought in in needs to be treated in a much better light and have lengthly title reigns. The two options I would have in bring in a new title for RAW is to set up Reigns/Rollins for the title at SummerSlam or do a battle royal tonight.Whoever get to be the 1st World Champion needs to hold the title at the very least for the rest of the year. Ideally for me Rollins or a heel turned Reigns would be the 1st champion and you would have a long build until next years WM where you have Rollins/Balor for the title. Im talking about that match at SS. I think WFIGS has come to the conclusion we want Balor vs Rollins it's just a matter of when
|
|
becks007
Main Eventer
BELT MARK
Joined on: Aug 14, 2011 9:11:57 GMT -5
Posts: 2,185
|
Post by becks007 on Jul 25, 2016 11:12:15 GMT -5
A good opportunity to bring back the Big Gold for RAW...
|
|
RV F'N D
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 13, 2012 21:34:37 GMT -5
Posts: 4,046
|
Post by RV F'N D on Jul 25, 2016 12:19:55 GMT -5
I want separate titles on both shows, just to keep the brand crossovers to an absolute minimum.
each show gets
Raw - WHC US Tag Belts Womens Cruiserweight
Smackdown - WWE IC Tag Belts Womens
I'd also like a contenders ranking system for each show to make wins and losses matter.
GM's can also trade talent, all the way up until the Rumble and then trades are cut until the next draft. Some semblance of rules and organization could help alot.
|
|
KingOfKingsā¢
Main Eventer
Running to get a piece of some Alexa Bliss cake
Joined on: Jul 22, 2016 20:04:38 GMT -5
Posts: 1,594
|
Post by KingOfKingsā¢ on Jul 25, 2016 12:23:37 GMT -5
A good opportunity to bring back the Big Gold for RAW... Always loved the Big Gold and felt like it should have always stayed on RAW.
|
|
|
Post by Jeremiah on Jul 25, 2016 13:00:21 GMT -5
Well let's see its supposed to be exclusive brands yet people want them to attack each other and fight over a belt that really limits opportunity for mid card guys. I say add world belt to Raw add tag and womans to Smackdown seperate the brands, except during the big four have a battle of mid card champions, have a brand rep fight each other but split the brands and belts, watered down everyone knows a belt doesn't make the guy hell rock main events even when not a champion.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 8:31:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2016 13:01:00 GMT -5
No cross overs, each brand gets their own titles, matches and storylines and they have two competent shows with stacked rosters. I can't see the point in having a champion that's on both brands because that not only makes the draft irrelevant, it changes nothing at all in the main event scene.
It worked before and it can work again, as long as neither show or title is being devalued.
|
|
Cameron Stone
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 16, 2013 18:16:15 GMT -5
Posts: 2,014
|
Post by Cameron Stone on Jul 25, 2016 13:50:54 GMT -5
I'm in favor of one title. Defend it against the opposite brand on multi brand ppv. Make the US and IC titles more meaningful.
|
|
johnnyaustin21
Main Eventer
Joined on: Nov 21, 2011 14:16:20 GMT -5
Posts: 1,609
|
Post by johnnyaustin21 on Jul 25, 2016 13:51:53 GMT -5
No cross overs, each brand gets their own titles, matches and storylines and they have two competent shows with stacked rosters. I can't see the point in having a champion that's on both brands because that not only makes the draft irrelevant, it changes nothing at all in the main event scene. It worked before and it can work again, as long as neither show or title is being devalued. agreed the brand split work until around '07 or '08 and then fell apart,the first few years where pretty good and made titles brought back or made in the post draft in the World Title,WWE Tag Team Titles and US Title actually meant something.Its just as time went on they all got watered down and so in turn did Smackdown. No cross branding or supershows,only the four major PPV's and then only having one cross branding match per big four PPV i.e. Royal Rumble Match,Survivor Series match and then one or two big dream matches per year and thats it.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 8:31:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 25, 2016 13:55:04 GMT -5
Why not do it very simply. Put Dean in a Championship Feud with someone on Smackdown leading into the next PPV. Meanwhile on Raw Rollins & Reigns get put into a number one contenders feud, after the next PPV while they are building up Rollins/Reigns v Ambrose Smackdown has a number one contenders program. It's very easy to keep switching this up every other month. I think the point of the brand split was to stop dual brand rivalries though. It would make the draft seem pointless if Ambrose is still showing up on Raw and Reigns/Rollins is showing up on SmackDown.
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Jul 25, 2016 14:04:07 GMT -5
Tournament most likely
|
|