|
Post by BSR on Aug 30, 2016 2:30:42 GMT -5
As someone who respects and appreciates the guys who paved the way, I'm all for it. I will take any legend in any capacity. Even Bret Hart. It won't hurt the product any. Who's he going to steal a WM spot from? Tyler Breeze? Pssshhhhhh Well. Now I have nothing to say.
|
|
|
Post by greenjack1992 on Aug 30, 2016 2:59:39 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Word™ on Aug 30, 2016 3:30:54 GMT -5
I have no interest in watching Goldberg do anything in 2016.
I loved Goldberg back in the day.. The late 90's and early 00's were a blast for any wrestling fan and Goldberg made the boom period of wrestling THAT much more entertaining than it already was.. His rise to fame in WCW was incredible to witness.
But I didn't care about his WWE run and I don't care to see him do it again.. Goldberg to me defines the term 'lightning in a bottle'.
|
|
|
Post by Duck Holliday on Aug 30, 2016 4:03:35 GMT -5
Do people really want to see Lesnar vs Goldberg again? Really? Not I... Admittedly I'd probably mark out when his music hits... but truly I don't need to see him come back for a final run or anything.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 26, 2024 4:10:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2016 6:31:39 GMT -5
I'd like to see Goldberg vs. John.
We've already seen Brock/Goldberg, and there's no one else a star of the level of Goldberg can really have a match with who he hasn't already (I guess Undertaker, but that's kind of a kick in the nards of people who wanted Taker vs. Sting).
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 26, 2024 4:10:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2016 7:20:22 GMT -5
Nonononono. Lesnar vs. Joe at WM33. Please. Instead of Shaq have Big Show vs. Goldberg in a WCW Showcase Extravaganza! This! I wanna see Goldberg back for the nostalgia, I'd love to see him go one on one with Big Show as long as it's billed as Big Shows retirement. He's a legend and deserves to go out with a blaze of glory. A throwaway feud with Goldberg prevents anyone else being wasted on it. I'm all for that, best idea I've read all week! I only see Brock Vs Goldberg going one way, and that's Brock avenging the loss at WMXX.
|
|
|
Post by T R W on Aug 30, 2016 8:38:55 GMT -5
No thanks. I'm good.
|
|
|
Post by hCo.Bro™ [brandon_lee] on Aug 30, 2016 11:27:59 GMT -5
I would love to see him back short term. Like come in around Royal Rumble and do another program with Lesnar. I think they could do a better job with a wrestle mania run.
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Aug 30, 2016 12:03:52 GMT -5
goldberg in 2-3 matches, used properly? love to see it, but after the wwe's absolutely abominable use of sting i'd almost put money on them just ing it all up.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 26, 2024 4:10:11 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 30, 2016 12:20:49 GMT -5
Would love to see him and brock get bood out the stadium... Love it Mauro
|
|
|
Post by Rude Awakening on Aug 30, 2016 13:39:06 GMT -5
goldberg in 2-3 matches, used properly? love to see it, but after the wwe's absolutely abominable use of sting i'd almost put money on them just ing it all up. Yeah he probably should have beat HHH, but I guarantee people would've complained if he beat Rollins. He probably would still be a part timer to this day if he wasn't forced to retire.
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Aug 30, 2016 14:26:44 GMT -5
goldberg in 2-3 matches, used properly? love to see it, but after the wwe's absolutely abominable use of sting i'd almost put money on them just ing it all up. Yeah he probably should have beat HHH, but I guarantee people would've complained if he beat Rollins. He probably would still be a part timer to this day if he wasn't forced to retire. it's too black and white to say he should've beat triple h or that people would complain if he beat rollins. it's really about the creative process. if sting IS going to lose to triple h, have it tell a story that benefits the sting character in some way or starts a really good new angle for him. tell a damn story, ya know? same goes for if he beats rollins - if he does, make it have some kind of damn meaning to it. sting could have had a run similar to terry funk in 97 in ecw. he wouldn't necessarily even have to win the belt. instead we got two badly written feuds with badly written finishes.
|
|
|
Post by Rude Awakening on Aug 30, 2016 14:36:58 GMT -5
Yeah he probably should have beat HHH, but I guarantee people would've complained if he beat Rollins. He probably would still be a part timer to this day if he wasn't forced to retire. it's too black and white to say he should've beat triple h or that people would complain if he beat rollins. it's really about the creative process. if sting IS going to lose to triple h, have it tell a story that benefits the sting character in some way or starts a really good new angle for him. tell a damn story, ya know? same goes for if he beats rollins - if he does, make it have some kind of damn meaning to it. sting could have had a run similar to terry funk in 97 in ecw. he wouldn't necessarily even have to win the belt. instead we got two badly written feuds with badly written finishes. I didn't mind HHH winning because I felt the whole DX/NWO thing phased it out for me. It really made no sense to grant sting a wwe championship match because he ruined a statue presentation, but it created a cool match up. It made no sense for Rollins to lose clean to cena and then miraculously beat Sting clean immediately after.
|
|
|
Post by rowdy1971 on Aug 30, 2016 14:38:31 GMT -5
I see Goldberg getting into the HOF and then doing a surprise run in at Mania 33 against Brock, after Brocks match with Vince McMahon (you know it's going to happen). I think they would stretch that match till Summerfest.
|
|
|
Post by Wrestlaholic on Aug 30, 2016 15:26:25 GMT -5
I loved Goldbergs 03/04 run, I'd like to see another run, but nothing to do with Lesnar thanks, that doesn't appeal.
|
|
|
Post by HHH316 on Aug 30, 2016 16:12:19 GMT -5
I have zero desire to see Goldberg in the ring. He was limited, at best, in 2003. Why is he going to be any better 13 years later? Answer: he won't.
|
|
|
Post by Cassa Nova Kid on Aug 30, 2016 16:29:45 GMT -5
I have zero desire to see Goldberg in the ring. He was limited, at best, in 2003. Why is he going to be any better 13 years later? Answer: he won't. He was never good to be fare however, same difference as if Kurt Angle signed or HBK what's the point beside nostalgia. I would mark out for Goldberg based on that alone.
|
|
|
Post by attitudesback on Aug 30, 2016 16:32:44 GMT -5
People don't seem to realise how much of a legend Goldberg is. If he's in good shape and still athletic, it will be incredible to see. Brock vs. Goldberg would probably be cool to see, but I can't say I'd be completely invested in the build.
|
|
|
Post by Rude Awakening on Aug 30, 2016 16:37:08 GMT -5
People don't seem to realise how much of a legend Goldberg is. If he's in good shape and still athletic, it will be incredible to see. Brock vs. Goldberg would probably be cool to see, but I can't say I'd be completely invested in the build. Exactly has Goldberg ever been about work rate? No. Despite that people still loved him and I would go crazy for a return and a few matches.
|
|
|
Post by Dan on Aug 30, 2016 16:54:28 GMT -5
It's inevitable, but it all water down the eventual return much like how Sting's was. It's more a matter of when than if. I just pray they don't go with Brock Lesnar vs Goldberg, as I'd be legitimately worried that they'd fully waste the clean win rub of beating Lesnar on Goldberg. I really find it hard to believe that they'd have him return just to lose his first match back too.
However, I'd be more than fine with John Cena vs Goldberg at this point in time, and Goldberg vs Seth Rollins.
|
|