|
|
Post by Sizzle on Oct 13, 2016 20:16:53 GMT -5
I don't know how I feel about this. She's not a formidable opponent to men like Kharma, Chyna, or Beth Phoenix. It makes no sense.
Also, she is really annoying.
|
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Oct 13, 2016 20:20:34 GMT -5
I like Sasha, but really, she's like 115 lbs and would be thrown out quicker than the Godfather in the 2013 Rumble if we are going by logic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rude Awakening on Oct 13, 2016 20:25:21 GMT -5
Now that is a Roman Reigns spear I want to see 😃
|
|
|
|
Post by cableV on Oct 13, 2016 20:38:44 GMT -5
They could put Nia Jax in the Rumble because she's not like most girls. She can eliminate James Ellsworth.
|
|
|
|
Post by cmiller79 on Oct 13, 2016 21:44:10 GMT -5
Nope
I could see nia maybe
|
|
|
|
Post by Angel Beast on Oct 13, 2016 21:51:26 GMT -5
Nia definitely, maybe Dana or Natalya as they're really the only powerhouse women in WWE. I love Saha but i don't see it.
|
|
|
|
Post by bababooey on Oct 13, 2016 21:52:26 GMT -5
Sorry Sasha. No. if they want to have a separate women's rumble fine, but how are we supposed to suspend disbelief enough to think someone who is 100 pounds soaking wet can win the Rumble?
|
|
Daria
Main Eventer
?¿
Joined on: Apr 10, 2012 10:08:56 GMT -5
Posts: 1,238
|
Post by Daria on Oct 13, 2016 22:08:30 GMT -5
Knowing triple h she'll end up winning
|
|
|
|
Post by Evil Abed on Oct 13, 2016 22:30:21 GMT -5
Maybe a better idea to have a dual branded 15 woman royal rumble or something to determine who faces their brands champion at Mania.
I just don't see what putting one of their womens competitors in the Royal Rumble does for anyone involved.
|
|
|
|
Post by BSR on Oct 13, 2016 23:24:30 GMT -5
I was under the impression she had either already won one or came up with the concept all together.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mox on Oct 13, 2016 23:30:58 GMT -5
Knowing triple h she'll end up winning This made me laugh. Also, I love Sasha. |
|
|
|
Post by hbkbigdaddycool on Oct 14, 2016 0:46:02 GMT -5
I have the best remark for this thread, but I have been so good lately and I don't want a warning bar again, so I guess I will behave.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 16, 2024 0:51:22 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2016 0:48:10 GMT -5
I wouldn't be opposed to a 15 woman rumble match, but keep them away from the men.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darkhawk on Oct 14, 2016 1:13:47 GMT -5
To get eliminated by Sasha Botch in the Royal Rumble would be a career killer. Anyways I would say no, cuz I don't like seeing spots wasted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Wordâ„¢ on Oct 14, 2016 3:51:47 GMT -5
I'm not buying into the Sasha hype..
None of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Escape The Rules on Oct 14, 2016 5:38:30 GMT -5
How  ing annoying is she? Dear Christ. |
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Oct 14, 2016 10:11:43 GMT -5
This video is horrible. Terrible. I'm a fan of Sasha, and at one point she was incredibly tuned into this character, but she's lost sight of it. Maybe it's because she's a babyface or maybe because she bought into the hype after NXT Brooklyn. I don't know, but what I do know is what she's doing right now, as a character, isn't good.
I'm all for women competing with men. What LU does works really well and that's the kind of thing that WWE should be moving towards. That being said, Sasha isn't Ivelisse, or Mariposa, Sexy Star or even Taya. Sasha just isn't the right fit for the Rumble. Charlotte could probably get away with it. I don't think Nia should be in the Rumble just because she's fat. That doesn't work for me. The Beth Phoenix concept is a much better direction. Ivelisse is presented like a bad b*tch on LU. Someone you know can hold their own. Sasha isn't presented like that at all. Which goes back to her having lost sight of her character.
So yeah, this is a hard no.
|
|
rtc1485
Superstar
Joined on: Dec 28, 2013 16:10:02 GMT -5
Posts: 803 
|
Post by rtc1485 on Oct 14, 2016 11:16:58 GMT -5
You could easily have a decent size women's royal rumble with a dual-brand and some nxt like asuka and liv Morgan for the hell of it.
|
|
Infinite
Main Eventer
Joined on: Aug 27, 2009 13:49:36 GMT -5
Posts: 2,608
|
Post by Infinite on Oct 14, 2016 11:32:45 GMT -5
Just gonna go ahead and say based on what ive seen of her on the main roster, she doesn't seem that likable. I've heard she was a pretty good heel though, and I think I can see that.
Wait what did she just say she's the greatest women's wrestler of all time
|
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Oct 14, 2016 11:36:42 GMT -5
LOL Bayley would be more believable in the Rumble.
|
|
