REAL REVY
Main Eventer
1000 Posts
Joined on: Feb 8, 2012 16:27:26 GMT -5
Posts: 1,000
|
Post by REAL REVY on Oct 17, 2016 10:53:33 GMT -5
The Royal Rumble needs a switch up we all know it. How many Wrestlers should fought in the rumble this year? Personally I feel 30 is a good number for the proximity of the fighters. Maybe they could add more rings like WCW
|
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Oct 17, 2016 11:01:16 GMT -5
The Royal Rumble doesn't need to change at all.
|
|
That 80s Guy
Main Eventer
Gnarly!
Joined on: Nov 6, 2010 14:29:43 GMT -5
Posts: 1,546
|
Post by That 80s Guy on Oct 17, 2016 11:02:31 GMT -5
--
Since NXT is looked at as 3rd Brand material, Regal should hold a lottery every week for 1 member of the roster, for their chance to enter the Royal Rumble. The story could be that Regal explains that this could be an opportunity for the 10 men selected, to get noticed by both RAW & SDL General Managers (which could "lead to bigger and brighter things").
On a similar note, the NXT women should be involved in a multi-women's Royal Rumble match itself, at the PPV.
|
|
|
|
Post by LA Times on Oct 17, 2016 11:06:06 GMT -5
30 but with no legends, midgets, announcers or women taking up spots.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rude Awakening on Oct 17, 2016 11:25:29 GMT -5
The rumble should stay at 30 entrants, just like how many threads have been made on this topic.......
|
|
REAL REVY
Main Eventer
1000 Posts
Joined on: Feb 8, 2012 16:27:26 GMT -5
Posts: 1,000
|
Post by REAL REVY on Oct 17, 2016 11:52:40 GMT -5
The rumble should stay at 30 entrants, just like how many threads have been made on this topic....... Taka Felled out the ring |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 19, 2024 7:21:58 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2016 12:16:56 GMT -5
30 is fine, but two things:
1.) No one does double duty. You either only have a match on the undercard, or you're only in the Rumble match, not both.
2.) No surprise one off entrants
|
|
|
|
Post by punksnotdead on Oct 17, 2016 12:46:01 GMT -5
30.
|
|
bigraj
Main Eventer
PSN: bigraj70501
Joined on: Nov 5, 2010 16:46:40 GMT -5
Posts: 1,778
|
Post by bigraj on Oct 17, 2016 12:49:24 GMT -5
I don't know about the Ruble, but the Rumble should have 30 participants.  |
|
|
|
Post by Mark Martin on Oct 17, 2016 12:57:14 GMT -5
30, always and forever.
|
|
👑🇵🇭⭐️
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
King Of The Ring 2007 - Team Undisputed
Joined on: Feb 4, 2013 13:46:47 GMT -5
Posts: 4,673
Member is Online
|
Post by 👑🇵🇭⭐️ on Oct 17, 2016 13:05:31 GMT -5
The way the WWE can sell 75,000 tickets for the Royal Rumble is to make it a 6 hour event which includes a 2 hour pre-show. Sell it as the biggest Royal Rumble in history. Royal Rumble Pre-show matches WWE Cruiserweight Championship Title match WWE United States Championship Title match WWE Intercontinental Championship Title match Royal Rumble card WWE Smackdown Women’s Championship Title match WWE Raw Women’s Championship Title match WWE Smackdown Tag Team Championship Title match WWE Raw Tag Team Championship Title match WWE World Championship Title match WWE Universal Championship Title match 50 Man Royal Rumble match (Champions and SuperStars in the Championship Title matches are all excluded from the Royal Rumble match) That's how you put @$$es in seats!! Every WWE SuperStar should be in the Royal Rumble except for the Champions and their respective Challengers. |
|
|
|
Post by Gone. on Oct 17, 2016 13:09:06 GMT -5
30 but with no legends, midgets, announcers or women taking up spots. Women should be able to take spots, but they should be treated equally. I'd love to see a Woman make it to the last 4 eliminated. |
|
|
|
Post by cordless2016 on Oct 17, 2016 18:17:59 GMT -5
30. It's the perfect number. They tried 40 in 2011 and it ended up being a snooze fest. Keep it to 30.
|
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on Oct 17, 2016 18:31:36 GMT -5
30. It's the perfect number. They tried 40 in 2011 and it ended up being a snooze fest. Keep it to 30. I liked the 40 man rumble a lot, one of my favorites |
|
|
|
Post by Chip on Oct 17, 2016 18:32:06 GMT -5
30.
Always and forever.
|
|
Hem-Ridge
Superstar
Joined on: Nov 18, 2011 13:27:06 GMT -5
Posts: 620
Member is Online
|
Post by Hem-Ridge on Oct 17, 2016 18:34:51 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Rude Awakening on Oct 17, 2016 18:46:30 GMT -5
30. It's the perfect number. They tried 40 in 2011 and it ended up being a snooze fest. Keep it to 30. I liked the 40 man rumble a lot, one of my favorites I liked it too, it was one way to get the nexus and corre involved |
|
|
|
Post by tylerbreezee on Oct 17, 2016 18:50:30 GMT -5
I liked the 40 man rumble a lot, one of my favorites I liked it too, it was one way to get the nexus and corre involved The Corre could have been something but creative who was on the top of their game in that period of 2011, somehow had nothing for them |
|
|
|
Post by Rude Awakening on Oct 17, 2016 18:54:00 GMT -5
I liked it too, it was one way to get the nexus and corre involved The Corre could have been something but creative who was on the top of their game in that period of 2011, somehow had nothing for them Only thing that really made me scratch my head was when they lost in like 3 minutes at wrestlemania 27 |
|
|
|
Post by Evil Abed on Oct 17, 2016 18:59:35 GMT -5
The Royal Rumble doesn't need to change at all. The be all, end all answer to these threads. |
|
