|
Post by BØRNS on Aug 16, 2017 23:01:43 GMT -5
I hope this fuels his character with it being like his "final mistake" or something like that that puts him over the edge and makes him focused. I'm not a fan, but anything adding to WWE's creativity is welcomed by me.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 5:06:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2017 3:13:06 GMT -5
Corbin will be fine. He has plenty of time. Sandow was doomed for the get go. The fact that Mizdow was the most over he had ever been, gave or heel showed that. That was his peak.
|
|
RV F'N D
Main Eventer
Joined on: Mar 13, 2012 21:34:37 GMT -5
Posts: 4,046
|
Post by RV F'N D on Aug 17, 2017 8:50:07 GMT -5
I didn't think he was good enough for the brief case to begin with, let alone be anywhere close to the world title. This is was a good decision.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Apr 24, 2024 5:06:32 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2017 13:51:06 GMT -5
So they really had him lose because of the Twitter exchange with Meltzer??
|
|
|
Post by kingnothing ~ Hardwired... on Aug 17, 2017 16:22:09 GMT -5
So they really had him lose because of the Twitter exchange with Meltzer?? Unknown. That's what "sources" are telling them, but his Twitter behavior hasn't changed since long before he actually won the briefcase, so unless something specific from his round with Meltzer triggered heat on him, I'd assume it was something else, or just part of the plan.
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Aug 17, 2017 20:52:25 GMT -5
So they really had him lose because of the Twitter exchange with Meltzer?? Unknown. That's what "sources" are telling them, but his Twitter behavior hasn't changed since long before he actually won the briefcase, so unless something specific from his round with Meltzer triggered heat on him, I'd assume it was something else, or just part of the plan. I didn't think Meltzer was protected by the WWE. Is he pals with Vince?
|
|
|
Post by Yayo on Aug 17, 2017 22:02:44 GMT -5
Unknown. That's what "sources" are telling them, but his Twitter behavior hasn't changed since long before he actually won the briefcase, so unless something specific from his round with Meltzer triggered heat on him, I'd assume it was something else, or just part of the plan. I didn't think Meltzer was protected by the WWE. Is he pals with Vince? Apparently he's also blocked several people who are employed by WWE on twitter and I think he even got into a verbal spat with a fellow talent that was out of character (can't remember who since Baron is constantly towing the line on twitter)
|
|
|
Post by IRS on Aug 18, 2017 2:28:41 GMT -5
I didn't think Meltzer was protected by the WWE. Is he pals with Vince? Apparently he's also blocked several people who are employed by WWE on twitter and I think he even got into a verbal spat with a fellow talent that was out of character (can't remember who since Baron is constantly towing the line on twitter) Think it was Mojo.
|
|
|
Post by theoutlaw1999 on Aug 18, 2017 16:44:56 GMT -5
I remember Goldust used to block people for nothing.
|
|
|
Post by BoJack Hogan on Aug 18, 2017 22:34:25 GMT -5
I'd rather see Corbin with the title than Nakamura. Naka has shown me nothing other than an awesome entrance since debuting...that includes his NXT stuff. I figured Cena would beat Corbin, Corbin would take it from Mahal after Mahal beat Nakamura, then Cena would feud with Corbin over the title until Survivor Series where he would either finally take it or get screwed by a Raw guy (possibly even Roman) to set him in another direction. But no. I see either Nakamura taking it and having a lackluster reign to match his lackluster WWE career or Mahal will retain and feud with Cena after Cena beats Corbin with one AA.
|
|
|
Post by Halloween King on Aug 19, 2017 2:42:39 GMT -5
Let me start by saying I dont watch wrestling these days, other than the classic stuff. But I did see this clip on FB and im glad it happened. It seems like the trend was having guys cash in the MITB and win, so him losing in such a grand fashion was awesome. Having that MITB case is not a guarantee.
|
|