Deleted
Joined on: Apr 18, 2024 4:56:03 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2018 19:39:32 GMT -5
You caught the typo, nicely done. Iconic screech. How many screeches could there be? The homophobic folks behind the verbal attacks were screech and a couple of others. I dunno? At least two?  Dustin Diamond would hate your 2006 humor, as a Hollywood Jew he is surely quite liberal. |
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Jan 26, 2018 19:51:21 GMT -5
2009-2017 was completely and totally a battle between Barack Obama and the Tea Party. Obamacare vs. Tea Party, that was the battle for nearly a decade. Thus, the US presidential match for 2016 should certainly have been Ted Cruz (Tea Party) vs. Joe Biden (ideologically on par with Obama). Instead, we get Hillary Clinton (who is to the right of Obama) and Trump (nationalist to the right of the Tea Party, who had nothing to do with the previous eight years). Made NO sense! I don't necessarily care for Biden or Cruz, but anyone else think that match would have made a lot more sense considering the previous eight years? Considering that the Tea Party for all intents and purposes doesn't exist anymore, no I don't think it does make sense. |
|
|
|
Post by Lego Customs! on Jan 26, 2018 19:53:53 GMT -5
Sanders is the President that America needs but doesn't deserve.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Jan 26, 2018 20:01:55 GMT -5
Sanders is the President that America needs but doesn't deserve. This is the only Sanders that America needs or deserves  |
|
|
|
Post by ~*Young $ Money*~ on Jan 26, 2018 20:04:21 GMT -5
I see where this thread is headed 🤦🏽♂️
|
|
|
|
Post by rkmo: Aviso de Diez Meses on Jan 26, 2018 20:56:20 GMT -5
The tax cut thing is a total scam. Trickle down economics did not work during Reagan and won’t work now. Expect the GOP to come forward and try to raise taxes over the next few years, same as good old Ronnie did I've heard speculation that Republicans are gonna force Democrats to run on raising taxes, turning away the common people who put stake in conservative viewpoints while attracting all that green in financial contributions from big business. GOP will take their time aiming at the "social safety net" and other federal programs they feel are wasteful as a counterbalance for those tax cuts. |
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Jan 26, 2018 21:29:07 GMT -5
I do too but it will more than likely be locked due to name calling by hysterical lefties who can't even read Trump's name without throwing a sh*tfit. Common trend around here. The last Trump thread was locked and moved to the evidence room because a group of users on here were so triggered at the sight of a Trump doll they started posting racist anti-white memes, calling anyone who didn't agree with them by women's names and/or cursing at them, and talking about cartoon porn(?). But yeah bro, all these damn delusion Trump supporters on here man amirite? I have the screen shots of all that still if you want to relive the hilarious temper tantrums. Any claim that the Trump threads get locked due to the pro-Trump people instead of the anti-Trump members who rely on name-calling and bullying tactics is completely dishonest. In my defense, I stayed out of that one. |
|
|
|
Post by disorder on Jan 26, 2018 22:04:46 GMT -5
it should of been Biden vs Cruz. Hillary had no place in that position, as it was doomed (even though she won the popular vote by over a million) This thread will be locked soon, I can imagine. Expect delusional trump supporters coming in and over powering it to the point it has to be locked. Edit* The tax cut thing is a total scam. Trickle down economics did not work during Reagan and won’t work now. Expect the GOP to come forward and try to raise taxes over the next few years, same as good old Ronnie did Much like they did with the polls on Nov 8th 2016   Hmm... |
|
|
|
Post by Tim of thee on Jan 26, 2018 22:12:26 GMT -5
Lol Clinton was the candidate since 08
|
|
|
|
Post by Nivro™ on Jan 26, 2018 22:19:24 GMT -5
Much like they did with the polls on Nov 8th 2016 Hmm... Awesome, NYC, LA and Chicago came to vote for Clinton...The rest of the US Didnt...  |
|
|
|
Post by theMOESIAH on Jan 26, 2018 22:22:37 GMT -5
Hmm... Awesome, NYC, LA and Chicago came to vote for Clinton...The rest of the US Didnt... Why should geographic location be more important than numbers of people who voted? The vote of someone who lives in a sparsely populated area should not count more than someone who lives in a highly populated area. |
|
|
|
Post by disorder on Jan 26, 2018 22:22:39 GMT -5
Hmm... Awesome, NYC, LA and Chicago came to vote for Clinton...The rest of the US Didnt... But as a majority..who showed more? It’s a plain fact, that the electoral vote is complete bs. There’s no defending it one bit |
|
