|
|
Post by dollarbill04 on Sept 14, 2018 16:09:39 GMT -5
Tye Dillinger. Everybody else. So a boring, lethargic wrestler and everyone else? Sure, why not. Lethargic? I dont think you know what that means. If you do, I don't see how that could describe him in any way. |
|
|
|
Post by FLUX '97 on Sept 14, 2018 17:08:46 GMT -5
So a boring, lethargic wrestler and everyone else? Sure, why not. Lethargic? I dont think you know what that means. If you do, I don't see how that could describe him in any way. A diminished, tired state or feeling of weariness and exhaustion. Describes how I feel after watching a Tye Dillinger match, actually. |
|
|
|
Post by dollarbill04 on Sept 14, 2018 18:54:07 GMT -5
Lethargic? I dont think you know what that means. If you do, I don't see how that could describe him in any way. A diminished, tired state or feeling of weariness and exhaustion. Describes how I feel after watching a Tye Dillinger match, actually. Nobody asked you how you feel after watching a Tye Dillinger match. I want to know how the word lethargic describes him. Since you seem to know him, or see more of him on TV than anybody else. |
|
rebornbyfate129
Mid-Carder
admins really taking down my stuff lmfao
Joined on: May 31, 2018 18:45:09 GMT -5
Posts: 279
|
Post by rebornbyfate129 on Sept 14, 2018 19:46:55 GMT -5
It is subjective but at the same time we all know a list of names that would warrant getting slapped if you said they were better than someone like Taker or Flair or Savage. exactly |
|
|
|
Post by ClashOfStyles on Sept 14, 2018 20:04:28 GMT -5
It’s all subjective. Winning and accomplishments aren’t based off of talent, so we can’t base anything off of that, the definition of an entertaining/engaging match or character is subjective and so is believability to an extent. There’s really no clear statistic to back up who “the best” is.
|
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Sept 14, 2018 23:20:43 GMT -5
you could argue about who has matches that are the most believable and well performed, but then that brings in bigger questions like is believability the bottom line with a professional wrestling performance? so at the end of the day, no, comparisons shouldn’t be drawn.
|
|
|
|
Post by Next Man’s Knowing Rock on Sept 15, 2018 5:29:08 GMT -5
you could argue about who has matches that are the most believable and well performed, but then that brings in bigger questions like is believability the bottom line with a professional wrestling performance? Believability is barely a factor at all. If it was, Vader squash matches would have more Meltzer asterisks than the Young Bucks choreographed gymnastics do. |
|
|
|
Post by k5 on Sept 15, 2018 9:38:53 GMT -5
you could argue about who has matches that are the most believable and well performed, but then that brings in bigger questions like is believability the bottom line with a professional wrestling performance? Believability is barely a factor at all. If it was, Vader squash matches would have more Meltzer asterisks than the Young Bucks choreographed gymnastics do. perhaps believability isn’t the right description, but rather the performer’s ability to suspend the disbelief of the audience. |
|
/cdn0.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/2884912/odbhit.0.gif)
