|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Jul 2, 2007 16:11:38 GMT -5
I would rather have it 3 hours and have all of the good wrestlers(means no Cena) and loose the 2 other shows. Yeah, they're going to leave the WWE champion out of the broadcast ... Just stop with the ing Cena-bashing... CENA IS RAW, WHETHER YOU LIKE IT, OR NOT...
|
|
|
Post by ThrowinUpTheX on Jul 2, 2007 16:28:26 GMT -5
Honestly i think 2 hours is long enough, but considering all the adverts we get 3 hours would equal to around 2 hours t.v time.
Why not?
|
|
Steph0105
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 23, 2005 1:47:01 GMT -5
Posts: 1,016
|
Post by Steph0105 on Jul 2, 2007 17:57:21 GMT -5
2 hour is enough, give the other hour to ECW If they give 3 hours to Raw, they will have to scrap a couple of PPV, who will want to pay to watch 3 hour when they can have it free on monday
|
|
|
Post by pwsphil on Jul 2, 2007 18:05:32 GMT -5
24 hours. every monday USA should be WWE TV. they preveiw raw,show the arena being set up,interveiw superstars,replay last weeks raw and then the live show.
|
|
|
Post by B®ÄУȟ ÏÄÑ on Jul 2, 2007 18:08:28 GMT -5
I don't like that idea. Number one that's more work for the superstars. I can't get motivated to watch all three hours to be honest. I usually end up taping the three hour episodes and not watching them. However, this does give some more time to develop mid card and "jobber" personalites. It could be both good and bad if you ask me. I'd still rather them stick with 2 hours.
|
|
Dwight
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 10, 2007 11:02:46 GMT -5
Posts: 2,686
|
Post by Dwight on Jul 2, 2007 19:04:23 GMT -5
Two is fine. It would become too much, too many storylines (probably) and most already complain about the ones that go on now. WCW tried this concept and found out how stupid they were for doing so.
|
|
|
Post by sheltonbenjamin on Jul 2, 2007 19:29:51 GMT -5
3 hours of WRESTLING, not promos
|
|