|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Sept 11, 2007 7:33:15 GMT -5
It's called Destiny........... lol
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Sept 11, 2007 13:00:14 GMT -5
It's called Destiny........... lmfao.
|
|
|
Post by drippy on Sept 11, 2007 15:34:21 GMT -5
Real shame that Undertaker V Mark Henry wont be a Buried Alive anymore, basically because of Mark Henry's contract extension, keeping him involved for another 3 years. It made huge sense to make it a Buried Alive, with all the Sand druids, and clips of his hand raising out the ground. I was really up for a Buried Alive. Sand =/= Dirt Sand, if anything, is more representative of time slipping away. And it's not like the feud is going to end at Unforgiven, anyway. I don't want a return match being gimmicked, with one-sided build-up and everything? No thanks.
|
|
|
Post by MondayRaw on Sept 11, 2007 21:06:20 GMT -5
Add Punk vs. Burke to the card
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Sept 12, 2007 7:00:29 GMT -5
Add Punk vs. Burke to the card I can't believe they're going to job Burke out again to Punk. Now he's gonna be 1-10 against him..
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Old School™ on Sept 12, 2007 7:52:07 GMT -5
^ Yeah, I can't believe they are turning Burke into a complete jobber like that. He deserves better. A shocking upset over Punk might be nice and then just have Punk win it back a few days later on ECW.
|
|
|
Post by kamardo on Sept 13, 2007 22:44:30 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by hardyz on Sept 14, 2007 12:10:44 GMT -5
Orton is going to win. Easy as that. On that day Cena will have been champ for 364 days. I highly doubt WWE would let even Cena have the title for 365 days...
|
|
|
Post by wwfanatic04 on Sept 14, 2007 13:11:35 GMT -5
I want to see this PPV, but now that I've cut down on ordering them, it really makes me think which ones are the best ones to order. Unforgiven looks great. Cena/Orton II (I missed their SummerSlam encounter), Triple H vs. Carlito, Taker's return, Punk/Burke, Tag Title matches look good... I'm willing to bet that it'll be a solid show.
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Sept 14, 2007 14:26:58 GMT -5
Orton is going to win. Easy as that. On that day Cena will have been champ for 364 days. I highly doubt WWE would let even Cena have the title for 365 days... Why wouldn't they? He is their main attraction..
|
|
|
Post by Goldust on Sept 14, 2007 14:56:14 GMT -5
Well, if Cena is gonna lose the belt, it ain't gonna be to Orton. He's probably gonna hold on to it for a while longer.
|
|
|
Post by hardyz on Sept 14, 2007 15:13:03 GMT -5
Orton is going to win. Easy as that. On that day Cena will have been champ for 364 days. I highly doubt WWE would let even Cena have the title for 365 days... Why wouldn't they? He is their main attraction.. Describe good main attraction and Cena in nowhere near the top.
|
|
|
Post by hardyz on Sept 14, 2007 15:14:39 GMT -5
Well, if Cena is gonna lose the belt, it ain't gonna be to Orton. He's probably gonna hold on to it for a while longer. Well on RAW on Monday, I caught J.R calling Cena a legend and how RKO could kill the legend of Cena, and Cena's title reign.
|
|
|
Post by spacejam on Sept 14, 2007 15:53:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Sept 14, 2007 16:07:30 GMT -5
Why wouldn't they? He is their main attraction.. Describe good main attraction and Cena in nowhere near the top. If you honestly can't admit that Cena is the premier attraction in WWE, then you're a blind Cena hater. Cena sells the most merchandise, and is by far the most over..getting cheered by 1/2 of the fans, and booed by the other 1/2. No matter what, he always gets the biggest reaction, good or bad. He is a hard worker and is the #1 Guy in WWE..
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Sept 14, 2007 20:37:42 GMT -5
Why wouldn't they? He is their main attraction.. Describe good main attraction and Cena in nowhere near the top. ...lol. A main attraction gets the fans off their seats: Check. A main attraction sells merchandise: Check. A main attraction causes controversy: Check. A main attraction doesn't risk everything only to get injured every 2nd week: Check. Yep, Cena isn't a main attraction.
|
|
|
Post by Barrett on Sept 14, 2007 21:11:15 GMT -5
A couple current pet peeves about WWE's on-air promoting techniques:
-The match graphics they use for the rundown of matches have sucked recently. They used to use such awesome and creative graphics (No Way Out '05's being my personal favorite). The ones they have for Unforgiven are probably the most boring ones they've used yet. Slow-mo zooming in on PSDs, fade out, and repeat. Any novice using a video editor could do that. -They don't even promote all the matches while doing the rundown anymore either. I'm prett sure they did this for Summerslam as well, if not including GAB/Vengeance (I thought I noticed it when they were promoting Vengeance, but I didn't see as many shows so I just thought I had missed something. Pretty much the same with GAB).There are eight matches scheduled for Unforgiven and how many did they showcase tonight on Smackdown? Five. Neither Tag Title matches nor the Women's Championship match was mentioned. And they wonder why no one gives a damn about PPVs anymore. I remember back when they at least attempted to make every match seem like it was a must-see affair.
Trivial things, I know. But it still bugs me.
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Sept 14, 2007 21:15:49 GMT -5
I thought I was the only one that noticed little things like that. I really hated the Summerlsam promos, where it was just a still shot of them going face-to-face. And if they're going to do that, they should have actually done a proper shoot with them going face-to-face, not just random shots of them looking in different directions. /rant.
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Sept 14, 2007 21:58:09 GMT -5
Yeah, their graphics have really sucked lately.
Speaking of the graphics, I remember when they first went to the moving ones..in late 2001 I believe..
|
|
|
Post by Barrett on Sept 14, 2007 22:27:15 GMT -5
The graphics from No Way Out '05 are still my favorite:
|
|