|
Post by crazytown on Sept 10, 2007 17:00:20 GMT -5
<
|
|
|
Post by lonerchick on Sept 10, 2007 21:40:10 GMT -5
well since im more into the highflying, jeff...but matt is better when it comes to actual wrestling talent...wait...does that even make sence....
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Sept 11, 2007 0:05:38 GMT -5
They complete each other.
|
|
|
Post by nexivdr on Sept 11, 2007 0:18:13 GMT -5
MATT v 1.0
|
|
|
Post by Chicago on Sept 11, 2007 0:34:42 GMT -5
Matt and Jeff are a pretty good tag team when mixing their styles together,
but as singles wrestlers, both are equally average; not bad, but not too good at the same time.
|
|
|
Post by markallenkellner on Sept 11, 2007 11:04:23 GMT -5
They both so overrated. If I had to pick though, it would be Matt. I did like him during the Matt Hardy Version 2.0 era.
|
|
|
Post by Nineteen 90 on Sept 11, 2007 13:53:35 GMT -5
Matt, just because he's more reliable.
|
|