|
|
Post by discoenforcer on Sept 18, 2007 1:53:43 GMT -5
Are you happy that Batista is World Champion?
Me: I like it but I did want Rey to win, but atleast The Great Khali isnt champ anymore he was terrible.
|
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Sept 18, 2007 1:56:03 GMT -5
Meh, I don't care. I don't watch Smackdown.
|
|
|
|
Post by xyn on Sept 18, 2007 2:09:03 GMT -5
I really don't care too much. I mean who else is there?
|
|
|
|
Post by silverc on Sept 18, 2007 2:09:19 GMT -5
Out of the three that were in the match I was hoping rey was going to win, but as long as taker gets it back, i'm cool
|
|
|
|
Post by DZ: WF Legacy on Sept 18, 2007 2:17:11 GMT -5
I used to really like Batista, but I'm so sick of him being in every Smackdown main event. I know they don't have a lot of realistic options at the moment, so I suppose I understand. I was hoping Kane and Finlay would become legits during this main eventer drought.
|
|
|
|
Post by nexivdr on Sept 18, 2007 2:38:29 GMT -5
i hate him so much, way to go wwe pushing the roider during all that crap. everyone else gets suspended he gets the world title.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Sept 18, 2007 5:39:22 GMT -5
eh i like Dave as champ shure, but Rey would of been good, but we all know its all about Edge and undertaker for the wwe heavy weight title, and thats what i cant wait for.
|
|
dtldiva
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 25, 2005 11:29:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,132
|
Post by dtldiva on Sept 18, 2007 6:32:43 GMT -5
I would have loved to have seen Rey win, but as long as it's not Khali anymore it's fine with me and I hope they decide to rekindle the rivalry between Batista and Undertaker because that was one of the best rivalries that I enjoyed this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by schilling4senate on Sept 18, 2007 7:27:23 GMT -5
I think right now he is the only one on smackdown thats capable of carrying it right now.
You can't trust Rey with it yet,You need to make sure his body is completly healthy.
Kahli was a total joke.
Undertaker deserves it but they shouldnt rush him right into it
Mark Henry would be better than Kahli but still no thanks
Matt Hardy wouldnt be so bad but he still has his thing with MVP,who also would be a good champ just not yet
|
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Sept 18, 2007 7:33:02 GMT -5
Hell No! Why doesnt Kane have a shot? He lost his shot at GAB and is never given a descent go! At least he is DIFFERENT and is entertaining. Batista is a damn hog and sucks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Sept 18, 2007 7:35:20 GMT -5
There's really nobody else to hold it. I'd rather see him with the belt than Khali
|
|
|
|
Post by Edgeman05 on Sept 18, 2007 7:38:20 GMT -5
Gladly. I was suprised Rey didnt get it but im fine with that. I like Batista much more then Rey and Khali. I still wish other guys could be broughten into the title picture tho.
|
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Sept 18, 2007 7:48:47 GMT -5
I would rather Khali. His dominance 'trait' is at least a descent way of holding the title. Batista is boring as though, really he lacks any kind of amazement IMO. Also, Kane or Finlay are capable of holding the title. Both are great compeititors and are main-event level on SD. Both are reasonable and are at least DIFFERENT to the same old Batista.
|
|
|
|
Post by htmlegend on Sept 18, 2007 7:59:24 GMT -5
I'm happy they got the title off of Khali even if it means putting it on Batista.
|
|
|
|
Post by taker1 on Sept 18, 2007 8:02:26 GMT -5
I would rather Khali. His dominance 'trait' is at least a descent way of holding the title. Batista is boring as though, really he lacks any kind of amazement IMO. Also, Kane or Finlay are capable of holding the title. Both are great compeititors and are main-event level on SD. Both are reasonable and are at least DIFFERENT to the same old Batista. Exactly. I didn't mind Khali's reign that much. But Batista is just bland. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Sept 18, 2007 8:05:28 GMT -5
Lesser of the 3 evils.
|
|
|
|
Post by Triple S on Sept 18, 2007 8:32:00 GMT -5
Anything is better than Khali holding the strap... even Batista.
The Undertaker will beat Batista for it ( hopefully at No Mercy ) and then The Undertaker will square off against the Royal Rumble winner, Edge at WrestleMania 24 in a "WrestleMania Streak vs. WrestleMania Streak" match.
Say all that you want that Edge "lost" at WrestleMania 23, but he just didn't win. He's never been pinned or submitted. Therefore, he's still undefeated.
- Triple S
|
|
|
|
Post by Flava Dave on Sept 18, 2007 8:38:34 GMT -5
Meh, I don't care. I don't watch Smackdown. |
|
|
|
Post by ecwbeatwcw01 on Sept 18, 2007 8:57:41 GMT -5
im glad batista won the title. but i rather edge have it. cant wait for the undertaker to win it back
|
|
|
|
Post by LeighD on Sept 18, 2007 10:04:39 GMT -5
I hate Batista. I'm waiting for UT and Edge (don't like him, but he can draw) to return from injury, then it make the WHC scene interesting. I would've liked Kane to have had a small run with the belt, but doesn't look like that will be happening.
|
|
