|
Post by DgenerationX092 on Nov 8, 2007 22:55:45 GMT -5
just watched part one, and id say that mystery guy is deffinitly the Big Show
|
|
|
Post by anarchoraccoon on Nov 9, 2007 5:11:42 GMT -5
Ok....here are my two questions. One, who do you think was the guy who did not want to be named? A wrestler? An employee? Two, who knew that Davey Boy's cousin was in such bad shape? And as I think, McMahon seemed very weery on how he answered. And the was Cena covered his tail......I honestly thought Cena was clean. I really liked Cena, but I lost a ton of respect for him due to that answer. Well, I think the "mystery man" who wanted his identity to be consealed, was definitely a former wrestler. It probably was someone recently fired from WWE. Maybe Rob Conway, Rene Dupree or someone like that. Second, I had heard a while ago that Dynamite was confined to a wheelchair due to the many bumps he took in the ring over the years. It's sad that's what he looks like today. As for Cena's response, he could've been more honest about it, but he chose not to and I can't say that I blame him. He's got a HUGE fanbase right now and the last thing he wants is to lose them all at this point. I think he answered the question as best as he could and very carefully knowing Vince would be watching or would eventually find out what he said. I myself, would've preferred a simple "yes or no", but whatever. They can try to hide the fact or dance around the answer, but we all know the real truth. Cena's just got too much riding on it right now and that's why he answered it the way he did. McMahon did a pretty good job by basing his argument on how he doesn't force complete control over wrestlers' individual personal decisions. He also pointed out shortcomings of the Benoit brain study, allowing the issue to be inconclusive. Cena didn't do so well, basically saying that using steroids isn't that big of a deal. His reluctance to give a yes or no answer implies that he has used them before and has used them recently. If it was only something he had done in the past, he could've said that it was something he tried, but that he was able to rise to the top without them. By saying that no one would be able to prove it basically translates to, "I did it and there's nothing you can do about it." C.M. Punk did a great job and stood as a solid example of how rising up the ranks isn't just about having the biggest muscles. WWE could benefit greatly by pushing him further, and not just because it would give them leverage in the current steroid scandal. I can see him headlining Wrestlemania someday.
|
|
|
Post by rkolegendkilla on Nov 9, 2007 6:39:10 GMT -5
even news anchors think that parading around saying that you're drug free is stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Nov 9, 2007 9:44:25 GMT -5
even news anchors think that parading around saying that you're drug free is stupid. to make a stupid ass claim like that without any proof makes Willaim regal on here look like a saint
|
|
|
Post by DgenerationX092 on Nov 9, 2007 14:41:46 GMT -5
McMahon did a pretty good job by basing his argument on how he doesn't force complete control over wrestlers' individual personal decisions. He also pointed out shortcomings of the Benoit brain study, allowing the issue to be inconclusive. Cena didn't do so well, basically saying that using steroids isn't that big of a deal. His reluctance to give a yes or no answer implies that he has used them before and has used them recently. If it was only something he had done in the past, he could've said that it was something he tried, but that he was able to rise to the top without them. By saying that no one would be able to prove it basically translates to, "I did it and there's nothing you can do about it." C.M. Punk did a great job and stood as a solid example of how rising up the ranks isn't just about having the biggest muscles. WWE could benefit greatly by pushing him further, and not just because it would give them leverage in the current steroid scandal. I can see him headlining Wrestlemania someday. again, if cena used steriods recently, you CAN prove he did it (simple drug test). he said you'll never be able to prove he used steriods. meaning he doesnt take steriods anymore. And he said "i cant say i havent taken them". i think that statemnt comes from before he wrestled with WWE, and maybe took steriods while in OVW or while bodybuilding.
|
|
scoobypat
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 22, 2006 18:39:00 GMT -5
Posts: 2,442
|
Post by scoobypat on Nov 9, 2007 18:17:49 GMT -5
cena said im not gonna say I havent taken them but you cant prove that I have well i guess that does mean he has taken steriods. but you CAN prove someone has taken steriods, if theyre currently taking them. so i think that means he did, say when he was a pro bodybuilder, or was a monster in OVW or stuff like that, but doesnt take it anymore. id say he stopped when he came to WWE. and im not even saying that as a cena fan. his body just doesnt look like that of a steriod taker. not since hes been in WWE at least. Not really, steroids are actually one of the most difficult drugs to test. Currently HGH is nearly impossible to detect. Steroids are a busines with big money to be made, and those who produce them realize more money lies in making the trail of them hard to follow, and so as time goes on they will become practically impossible to detect. Expect less people to test positive in the future and the majority of the busts come from looking at the lists that these companies have of customers.
|
|
|
Post by hollywood06 on Nov 9, 2007 20:22:05 GMT -5
WWE just posted this thing on thier website from CNN asking John Cena if he's ever taken roids.. WWE is soo pissed.
|
|