Jorden
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 22, 2008 1:36:35 GMT -5
Posts: 1,607
|
Post by Jorden on May 10, 2008 1:47:03 GMT -5
Oh lord.. Donnie Darko is one of my all time favorite movies and this just sounds lke a total disaster. What a shame.
|
|
RBW
Main Eventer
There is no such thing as death: Life is only a dream and we are the imagination of ourselves
Joined on: Nov 24, 2004 17:36:15 GMT -5
Posts: 4,386
|
Post by RBW on May 10, 2008 4:03:33 GMT -5
NO! Don't ruin the legacy of a GREAT Movie, just by cashing in on the name-fame for a sequel!
|
|
|
Post by hurricane on May 10, 2008 5:15:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by v/\v on May 10, 2008 5:28:54 GMT -5
Worst idea ever!
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on May 10, 2008 9:20:25 GMT -5
Meh. I say let them do what they want. It'll probably suck. But I don't believe in the whole "sequels tarnish the original" crap. If it's not good, just don't acknowledge the film.
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on May 10, 2008 10:44:56 GMT -5
Um... why would they make another when personally I felt the first one was ridiculously bad. It really didn't have anything in it that was original and honestly the shots were not done very well.
|
|
|
Post by Edgeman05 on May 10, 2008 11:13:41 GMT -5
I hope this doesnt come through. Straight to DVD most likely? And why would Richard Kelly even let anyone mess with the Darko name? Doesnt he own it?
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on May 10, 2008 11:14:41 GMT -5
I hope this doesnt come through. Straight to DVD most likely? And why would Richard Kelly even let anyone mess with the Darko name? Doesnt he own it? Nope. It's owned by the studio.
|
|
|
Post by jake_317 on May 10, 2008 14:46:58 GMT -5
Um... why would they make another when personally I felt the first one was ridiculously bad. It really didn't have anything in it that was original and honestly the shots were not done very well. erm....the whole time travel theory from the first film is completely original.
|
|
|
Post by biggles on May 10, 2008 21:53:36 GMT -5
Don't know about a sequel, but it will be interesting.
|
|
|
Post by Barrett on May 12, 2008 23:07:20 GMT -5
|
|
Stinger TNA
Main Eventer
"Support TNA"
Joined on: Mar 31, 2010 19:21:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,481
|
Post by Stinger TNA on May 12, 2008 23:14:30 GMT -5
Is Maggie G. in this? Does she squeeze one out? IS SHE STILL WORKING AT THE YARN BARN?!?!?!?!?
|
|
|
Post by Kliquid on May 13, 2008 0:33:13 GMT -5
Um... why would they make another when personally I felt the first one was ridiculously bad. It really didn't have anything in it that was original and honestly the shots were not done very well. They'd make another because obviously other people thought it was good. And what the are you talking about, that it's not original?
|
|
|
Post by hurricane on May 13, 2008 7:00:51 GMT -5
Well, I guess this will go down like American Psycho 2. I'll only acknowledge it's existence when I absolutely have to.
|
|
Stinger TNA
Main Eventer
"Support TNA"
Joined on: Mar 31, 2010 19:21:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,481
|
Post by Stinger TNA on May 13, 2008 10:09:51 GMT -5
Wait, what if this turns out to not be half bad?
|
|
martel
Main Eventer
Joined on: Dec 18, 2001 13:39:05 GMT -5
Posts: 3,948
|
Post by martel on May 13, 2008 15:04:22 GMT -5
Is Maggie G. in this? Does she squeeze one out? IS SHE STILL WORKING AT THE YARN BARN?!?!?!?!? The questions everyone needs the answers to.
|
|
|
Post by hurricane on May 13, 2008 15:06:07 GMT -5
Wait, what if this turns out to not be half bad? I'm going to go right ahead and assume that was a joke. Because a human being could not even comprehend saying such a thing.
|
|
|
Post by jake_317 on May 13, 2008 17:55:23 GMT -5
If this movie involves the creation of another tangent universe, it totally discredits the entire premise of the first film, which the day Donnie travels back to the night he meets Frank is supposedly the only time a tangent can be created or stopped. Once, not twice.
|
|