|
|
Post by JCF on Jul 13, 2008 18:44:01 GMT -5
Awesome review.
I've always felt the DA You-Manga's were great.
|
|
|
|
Post by ● kaneisdaman ● on Jul 14, 2008 0:39:54 GMT -5
So the legs are Big Show's too?! I realised that the torso and arms were the same as DA Big Show's (with the singlet sanded off) I hadn't realised the legs were aswell, I'm guessing the lower legs are new (I do have the DA12 figure but not to hand) It's a good figure on it's own or with RA AAE but reusing the entire Big Show body is inecusable really as Big Show was made to scale. I would rate this figure much lower than you did purely because it can't be displayed with any other figures due to Jakks reuse of inappropriate parts. It should get a 0/5 for every part used because they couldn't really be any worse. This is one of Jakks worst ever figures. Well i do not believe that these are new molds for the legs. They look to thick to be any other type and since the rest of the body is big shows why wouldnt the legs. But overall this is a good figure and to score a 0 per 5 for every part would be wrong. Each part is generally significantly better than other rubbish we get. Scale isnt everything in the crteria but is accounted for in docked marks. Thanks for you reply mate.  Good review, but the only thing I would argue with format-wise is the equal weighting given to accessories in comparison to the other criteria. Does having no accessories really make that much difference? Personally, I'd do the accessories as a mark out of 3. Otherwise, nice work. Thanks. Well in the scheme of things, its 4 parts the fig, 1 part the accessory which i see as fair. Plus its better to have equal weightings when broken down. However in the case of a figure with no accessory, the criteria can be adjusted. Thanks for pointing this out. |
|
