|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 6, 2016 13:07:01 GMT -5
A lot of people on here are fans of them. Their NXT run was great. Yeah, but they've been on the main roster for awhile now and have been complete jobbers and one of them got suspended, lol. Different strokes for different folks.
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 6, 2016 13:04:09 GMT -5
The Ascension seems like a waste.. No it's not. A lot of us wanted elite Ascension. Why? They're irrelevant.
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 6, 2016 13:02:06 GMT -5
The Ascension seems like a waste..
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 6, 2016 12:56:45 GMT -5
I could be wrong, but that looks like 2002 Rock attire to me.
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 6, 2016 12:54:03 GMT -5
Goldust, Pillman, and Rock look incredible. Don't care about the current day people.
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 6, 2016 12:38:37 GMT -5
GOLDUST AND FLYIN' BRIAN!!!!
They look great!
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 5, 2016 21:11:36 GMT -5
So, does anyone know when the new reveals will be revealed tomorrow?
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 5, 2016 20:43:02 GMT -5
Anyone know when this will start tomorrow? The new reveals?
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 5, 2016 19:19:37 GMT -5
I'll be picking up the Natural Disasters, 2006 DX Triple H, and Macho Man. So pumped for those 4 figures.
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 5, 2016 17:52:34 GMT -5
2006 DX Triple H to go along with the Walgreens Exclusive 2006 DX HBK from earlier this year.
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 5, 2016 17:49:05 GMT -5
Earthquake, Typhoon, 99 Macho Man. They continue to knock it out of the park with the flashbacks. Makes me not even care about today's guys.
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 5, 2016 17:45:43 GMT -5
1999 MACHO MAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 4, 2016 14:07:29 GMT -5
Gosh, those Jakks figures were terrible.
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 3, 2016 22:37:46 GMT -5
Uh oh. Those things have shelf-warmer written all over them. Hopefully my local Walmart carries more of the Hasbro style figures than these things in the future..
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 3, 2016 16:36:45 GMT -5
Can only speak to my area, Hudson County, NJ:
E 39 Sid Elite Bray Wyatt DM Taker NS Bossman HOF Tito HOF 4 Horsemen Elite Bo Dallas
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Aug 3, 2016 16:00:11 GMT -5
I ordered this figure from RSC. Mine has the tattoo, but is missing the silver tips on the boots. If it didn't have the tattoo, I would've flipped, lel.
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Jul 31, 2016 21:43:48 GMT -5
The Network Spotlight head wouldn't work for a 1996/WM 12 HBK. The Network Spotlight/1995 HBK still had the mullet, which was his last year of wearing a mullet. By WM 12/early 1996, he got rid of the mullet. And ironically enough, he probably got rid of it in early 1996 because Vince told him he was getting the title and Shawn probably felt it was time to get rid of the mullet look, if he was going to be more high profile and WWF Champion. Smart decision on his part, too.
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Jul 31, 2016 21:31:40 GMT -5
Critiquing an interviewers skills isn't being objectified or dehumanized...like...at all. Nothing wrong with people pointing out she isn't good at it. You're right. Although saying "at least she's nice to look at" is objectifying her. What are you guys expecting over a representative for RSC showing off TOYS - hard hitting journalism? She's there to promote the product. She loves the business. She apparently likes the figures. You think she is going to say "oh wow that figure is bad!" I still think you guys have this fantasy where Bill is handcuffed and grilled about quality assurance from Chris Hansen. I don't think anyone is expecting 'hard-hitting journalism.' But I am expecting someone whose been doing this for at least a year (if not longer), to remember to hold the mic up to her mouth when she is speaking and hold the mic up to the interviewee's mouth when that person is speaking. Maybe I am asking for too much, though..
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Jul 31, 2016 21:08:33 GMT -5
Nothing wrong with giving your opinion about an interviewer's skills when that is that person's job. That is part of the deal when you put yourself out there. Doesn't matter if that person is a man or a woman. Yeah, part of the deal is to be objectified and dehumanized. It's a pretty crappy deal then. Critiquing an interviewers skills isn't being objectified or dehumanized...like...at all. Nothing wrong with people pointing out she isn't good at it.
|
|
|
Post by Showstopper on Jul 31, 2016 21:07:41 GMT -5
Nothing wrong with giving your opinion about an interviewer's skills when that is that person's job. That is part of the deal when you put yourself out there. Doesn't matter if that person is a man or a woman. True, but just like the criticism thread which lead to Bill leaving the board for a time, some of the attacks are personal and don't need to be. One can say that she seems to be doing a poor job, or that she needs to make herself better acquainted with the product without resorting to personal attacks. That's true. It is fair to critique her interviewing skills (which are quite bad considering she's been doing this for a bit now), but you don't have to go below the belt. But I do find it laughable that people bring up her gender when trying to defend her. What does that matter?
|
|