|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 17, 2008 13:37:34 GMT -5
Why would TNA put Final Resolution in December this year? We've already had a "Final Resolution 2008". Wouldn't it be smart to wait until next year and do:
Jan. - Genesis
Feb - Against All Odds
March - Destination X
April - Lockdown
May - Sacrifice
June - Slammiverasry
July - Victory Road
August - Hard Justice
September - No Surrender
October - Bound For Glory
November - Turning Point
December - Final Resolution
|
|
|
|
Post by spawnsyxx9 on Oct 17, 2008 13:40:12 GMT -5
TNA's December pay-per-view, Final Resolution, has been moved from December 14 to December 7. This is because WWE Armageddon was moved from December 21 to December 14.
Yeah I was kinda questioning when I read this. But TNA will I guess just have FR II 2008
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 17, 2008 13:42:26 GMT -5
Moving it to December makes sense - but you can't wait to next year to do it? Blah. I'll just have to remember when I get the DVD that there's two of 'em lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Oct 17, 2008 13:53:12 GMT -5
cos they want to have Genesis on the road(cos the ppv has a lot of history. joe/angle, cage , booker debut)
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 17, 2008 15:11:56 GMT -5
Doesn't mean you ahve to name it a PPV - you've already have..
|
|
|
|
Post by Almost Like Flacco on Oct 17, 2008 15:35:49 GMT -5
Is it really that big of a deal, honestly? It's just the name of a PPV, it's not like it's going to be the exact same matches or anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 17, 2008 15:39:49 GMT -5
I didn't say it was a big deal. It just doesn't make any sense to hae the same PPV name twice. It's like WWE having two Backlash events in the same year.  |
|
|
|
Post by Blackjack on Oct 17, 2008 16:05:23 GMT -5
The should bring back Unbreakable for this year then start the new order. Because they can't have Genesis in November, and then again in January
|
|
|
|
Post by j2dacversion3 on Oct 17, 2008 16:09:54 GMT -5
That was the only date their 800 seat arena was available...
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 17, 2008 16:18:42 GMT -5
That was the only date their 800 seat arena was available... First off: It seats 1,000. Second, the date has nothing to do with a name.. |
|
Too Sweet
Main Eventer
R.I.P MJ
Joined on: Sept 20, 2006 23:28:07 GMT -5
Posts: 3,611
|
Post by Too Sweet on Oct 17, 2008 22:16:28 GMT -5
Final Resolution suits December anyways, you know, last PPV of the Year to round things off ect.. never got why a PPV named " FINAL Resolution " was on at the START of the year.
|
|
|
|
Post by LtD73 on Oct 18, 2008 2:35:01 GMT -5
What is the point of this thread.
It seems like youre the only person who cares about it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Oct 18, 2008 10:36:11 GMT -5
What is the point of this thread. It seems like youre the only person who cares about it. lol he is really |
|
|
|
Post by bigvanshefer on Oct 18, 2008 10:48:14 GMT -5
What is the point of this thread. It seems like youre the only person who cares about it. Because if nobody reported it, everyone would be bitching about the name change. You're bash him for telling you stuff that you'd be bitching about next month, basically. |
|
|
|
Post by American Phenom on Oct 18, 2008 11:05:04 GMT -5
Doesn't make any sense? It makes perfect sense now.
Genesis means a beginning. And what better time to have a new beginning than...you know...the beginning of the year?
Turning Point after Bound for Glory makes sense, as it symbolizes the changes to the company after the biggest show of the year, and Final Resolution is the final time of the year to resolve feuds.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 18, 2008 14:47:29 GMT -5
You guys are missing my point - I understand WHY they're doing it. It just doesn't make any sense to have two Final Resoulations in the same year. They could've easily waited to do it next year by bringing back the "Unbreakable" name for December this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Oct 18, 2008 16:16:42 GMT -5
You've been a fan of TNA for how many years
do you really have to question why TNA doesnt factor in common sense for decisions they make?
|
|
|
|
Post by Joe/Smurf on Oct 19, 2008 22:47:16 GMT -5
, it's not like it's going to be the exact same matches or anything. welllll....  |
|
|
|
Post by Controversial Maverick PUNK on Oct 20, 2008 0:26:01 GMT -5
I didn't say it was a big deal. It just doesn't make any sense to hae the same PPV name twice. It's like WWE having two Backlash events in the same year. Then why bother making a thread about it?.. Nobody (apart from you) really cares... |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Oct 20, 2008 1:18:57 GMT -5
If you don't care why'd you open the thread and take the time to reply? Gotta love WF - really  |
|
