|
|
Post by steve55 on Feb 22, 2008 0:44:37 GMT -5
TNA needs another title for heavyweights like an Intercontinental. Have a TNA Telivision Championship or something. It would be good for the mid card like Rellik, Robert Roode, Eric Young, James Strom, etc. These guys are usually just put in rivalries that arent that important. Look at Robert Roode. All he is doing is being Booker Ts push in TNA. I mean its alright, but they they cant waste all these guys in those kind of feuds. make another title
|
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Feb 22, 2008 0:52:14 GMT -5
No...they don't.
Remember what Mike Tenay used to say, ad nauseum, about the X-Division title?
Anyone? Anyone?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Funniest Guy in Pants on Feb 22, 2008 1:39:29 GMT -5
TNA needs to make honest.. uh.. people out of themselves and open the X Division up to everyone. They shouldn't make a big deal when anyone who isn't "officially" in the X Division wins the title. But all of this is moot. A new title won't fix TNA. That will just add to the cluster  that is their booking. They need to produce good television to turn the company around. They need to make some homegrown stars. Basically, they need to do the exact opposite of everything they are doing right now. |
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Feb 22, 2008 8:27:37 GMT -5
They need to define the title divsions more clearly, get antoehr show, then a title.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doomrider on Feb 22, 2008 8:31:09 GMT -5
TNA needs a new heavyweight title...because it broke last night at the house show, ha ha.
|
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Feb 22, 2008 10:13:45 GMT -5
Why not just put more time into the X-division?
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Feb 22, 2008 10:20:26 GMT -5
They have 5 titles & 1 unoffical one.. they have more than enough. They just have to put more into them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Feb 22, 2008 11:25:17 GMT -5
The tag team division and X-division are at an all-time low... I'd improve those first before being Russo-rific and adding another division.
Black Reign and Rellik: Jobber team in the Tag Division
James Storm: Push him in the X-division as the next Samoa Joe before pushing him as a main eventer.
Robert Roode: Pair him back up with Petey Williams and have them own the tag division for a while. It'll give Roode something to do while he builds main event credibility, and Petey can go back and own the X-division after.
Eric Young: Comedy character on the fringes of the X-division is what he is good for.
You can stick any wrestler on TNA's roster into the already existing divisions with a little imagination...
|
|
T1
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jan 23, 2008 11:51:45 GMT -5
Posts: 2,511
|
Post by T1 on Feb 22, 2008 12:02:27 GMT -5
I think they should make a " TNA Nightmare Title", just for the " freaks" that have nothing better to do. I'm sick of Abyss, Rellik, Mesias, etc, fighting over nothing in tons of quirky hardcore matches.
|
|
|
|
Post by timebombversion420 on Feb 22, 2008 12:28:00 GMT -5
put more time into the X division an get team 3d away from it far away from it
|
|
|
|
Post by The Funniest Guy in Pants on Feb 22, 2008 13:16:18 GMT -5
They have 5 titles & 1 unoffical one.. they have more than enough. They just have to put more into them. You can't count the tag titles as two seperate titles. But yeah, TNA is set on titles, this is not the problem with the company. I think they should make a " TNA Nightmare Title", just for the " freaks" that have nothing better to do. I'm sick of Abyss, Rellik, Mesias, etc, fighting over nothing in tons of quirky hardcore matches. That idea gets worse everytime I hear it. |
|
|
|
Post by THE *Legendary* STINGER on Feb 22, 2008 14:03:28 GMT -5
TNA needs to make honest.. uh.. people out of themselves and open the X Division up to everyone. They shouldn't make a big deal when anyone who isn't "officially" in the X Division wins the title. But all of this is moot. A new title won't fix TNA. That will just add to the cluster that is their booking. They need to produce good television to turn the company around. They need to make some homegrown stars. Basically, they need to do the exact opposite of everything they are doing right now. AGREED |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Feb 22, 2008 14:07:59 GMT -5
They have 5 titles & 1 unoffical one.. they have more than enough. They just have to put more into them. You can't count the tag titles as two seperate titles. But yeah, TNA is set on titles, this is not the problem with the company. I think they should make a " TNA Nightmare Title", just for the " freaks" that have nothing better to do. I'm sick of Abyss, Rellik, Mesias, etc, fighting over nothing in tons of quirky hardcore matches. That idea gets worse everytime I hear it. Sorry, I meant 4 titles with 1 unoffical one. Sorry. |
|
NAC ATTACK '08
Main Eventer
RECORD: 3 wins - 5 losses - 5 Battle Royals
Joined on: Jan 13, 2005 15:34:24 GMT -5
Posts: 1,678
|
Post by NAC ATTACK '08 on Feb 22, 2008 14:15:55 GMT -5
--
Deep down, I was really hoping the X-division would've been obalished from TNA at the last ppv.
That would've easily opened the door to introducing a Television title - surprisingly, something WWE hasn't capitalized on since squashing WCW/ECW (not entertainment championcrapwrestling)... but what's MORE surprising is that TNA HASN'T capitalized on THAT!
But aslong as the X title is around, you won't see any new titles anytime soon. And if we're introduced to one (not the beer drinkin title, a serious title), it's not going to make sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by deskjet on Feb 22, 2008 15:25:28 GMT -5
-- Deep down, I was really hoping the X-division would've been obalished from TNA at the last ppv. That would've easily opened the door to introducing a Television title - surprisingly, something WWE hasn't capitalized on since squashing WCW/ECW (not entertainment champion **** wrestling)... but what's MORE surprising is that TNA HASN'T capitalized on THAT! But aslong as the X title is around, you won't see any new titles anytime soon. And if we're introduced to one (not the beer drinkin title, a serious title), it's not going to make sense. With TNA's NWA roots and all the potential guys, I was extremely surprised there was no TV title introduced. I was skeptical of the Womens belt but thus gar its paid off. Again the TV title would be one more thing to help distinguish TNA from WWE, but then you'd hear...OMFGZZZZ they stole the tna title idea from WCW-STFU |
|
NAC ATTACK '08
Main Eventer
RECORD: 3 wins - 5 losses - 5 Battle Royals
Joined on: Jan 13, 2005 15:34:24 GMT -5
Posts: 1,678
|
Post by NAC ATTACK '08 on Feb 22, 2008 17:24:06 GMT -5
-- Deep down, I was really hoping the X-division would've been obalished from TNA at the last ppv. That would've easily opened the door to introducing a Television title - surprisingly, something WWE hasn't capitalized on since squashing WCW/ECW (not entertainment champion **** wrestling)... but what's MORE surprising is that TNA HASN'T capitalized on THAT! But aslong as the X title is around, you won't see any new titles anytime soon. And if we're introduced to one (not the beer drinkin title, a serious title), it's not going to make sense. With TNA's NWA roots and all the potential guys, I was extremely surprised there was no TV title introduced. I was skeptical of the Womens belt but thus gar its paid off. Again the TV title would be one more thing to help distinguish TNA from WWE, but then you'd hear...OMFGZZZZ they stole the tna title idea from WCW-STFU -- Agreed! (that sig kicks ass btw lol) |
|
|
|
Post by The Funniest Guy in Pants on Feb 22, 2008 19:02:11 GMT -5
-- Deep down, I was really hoping the X-division would've been obalished from TNA at the last ppv. That would've easily opened the door to introducing a Television title - surprisingly, something WWE hasn't capitalized on since squashing WCW/ECW (not entertainment champion **** wrestling)... but what's MORE surprising is that TNA HASN'T capitalized on THAT! But aslong as the X title is around, you won't see any new titles anytime soon. And if we're introduced to one (not the beer drinkin title, a serious title), it's not going to make sense. Why would you want TNA to get rid of the only thing that really sets them apart from the WWE? It's been proven in the past that when the X Division is done right, it can easily become the best part of the company and actually make TNA worth watching. |
|
NAC ATTACK '08
Main Eventer
RECORD: 3 wins - 5 losses - 5 Battle Royals
Joined on: Jan 13, 2005 15:34:24 GMT -5
Posts: 1,678
|
Post by NAC ATTACK '08 on Feb 22, 2008 21:24:53 GMT -5
-- Deep down, I was really hoping the X-division would've been obalished from TNA at the last ppv. That would've easily opened the door to introducing a Television title - surprisingly, something WWE hasn't capitalized on since squashing WCW/ECW (not entertainment champion **** wrestling)... but what's MORE surprising is that TNA HASN'T capitalized on THAT! But aslong as the X title is around, you won't see any new titles anytime soon. And if we're introduced to one (not the beer drinkin title, a serious title), it's not going to make sense. Why would you want TNA to get rid of the only thing that really sets them apart from the WWE? It's been proven in the past that when the X Division is done right, it can easily become the best part of the company and actually make TNA worth watching. Because when you DO look back on that time, it wasn't enough, and when you're in a business, you have to try and venture into new ideas, new concepts. Granted, the X division was hella cool the first several years. Now they're hitting "the big time", it's not only wore off it's novelty, but compared to the idea of say for example, a TV championship - something ALL midcarders can via for, it pales in comparison to continue with an X title. |
|
|
|
Post by The Funniest Guy in Pants on Feb 23, 2008 0:09:05 GMT -5
Why would you want TNA to get rid of the only thing that really sets them apart from the WWE? It's been proven in the past that when the X Division is done right, it can easily become the best part of the company and actually make TNA worth watching. Because when you DO look back on that time, it wasn't enough, and when you're in a business, you have to try and venture into new ideas, new concepts. Granted, the X division was hella cool the first several years. Now they're hitting "the big time", it's not only wore off it's novelty, but compared to the idea of say for example, a TV championship - something ALL midcarders can via for, it pales in comparison to continue with an X title. You can't expect one title or one division to carry an entire company. If that's all that was required, then there would be not need for the other titles and divisions. I don't understand why you say that a title like the X Division title could only work for a couple years, while titles like the TV and Cruiserweight titles will work for much longer? The X Division is still one of the most popular things TNA has going, regardless of how badly they ed it up. It could be returned back to its former greatness, and then some if TNA would open it up and make it "about no limits" like they have claimed it is for years. Then you could have X Division guys feuding with Heavyweight guys over the X Division title and other things like that to shake things up. If TNA would actually do that, then I would see no need to get rid of the title. They need something to set them apart from everyone else... aside from a non-stop flood of pointless gimmick matches. |
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 25, 2024 12:25:24 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2008 16:21:47 GMT -5
TNA doesnt need a new title. I think 4 is enough. But they need to make the X Division a real title instead of ruining it. TNA totally buried it.
|
|
