|
|
Post by The Mac on Nov 1, 2008 5:55:32 GMT -5
Wow thats great new, lets go TNA!!!
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Nov 27, 2024 9:41:21 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2008 11:18:08 GMT -5
A 1.2 rating is good for TNA standards, but IMO, isn't enough to become real competition for WWE. Also, IMO, that las iMPACT was rather boring, and I feel the live iMPACT was way better. But that's just me. Nevertheless, TNA is moving up, and I think if they continue, they could make it too a 2.0 rating by late 2009, early 2010.
|
|
|
|
Post by the franchise on Nov 1, 2008 11:22:52 GMT -5
For a company to get a 1.2 on national tv is not a good thing. Get back to me when they get into the upper 2's.
|
|
|
|
Post by NYdream™ on Nov 1, 2008 11:24:15 GMT -5
How is a 1.2 high? Is this out of 5? or 10? Its not out of anything. It means 1.2 million people watched TNA.... |
|
Stinger TNA
Main Eventer
"Support TNA"
Joined on: Mar 31, 2010 19:21:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,481
|
Post by Stinger TNA on Nov 1, 2008 11:29:02 GMT -5
1.2! HOLY CHRIST! WATCH OUT WWE! THEY'RE CREEPING UP ON YOUR 3.0 RATINGS!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Heresy on Nov 1, 2008 12:34:23 GMT -5
The lowest rated segment featured the Motor City Machine Guns vs. Tanahashi and Volador. That's cold. |
|
Hollywood QJD
Main Eventer
Awesome Enters
Joined on: Aug 27, 2008 15:03:06 GMT -5
Posts: 4,040
|
Post by Hollywood QJD on Nov 2, 2008 15:04:01 GMT -5
WOW!! A 1.2!! That's so unbelievably Epic! How amazing and Great! Watch your asses, WWE,  |
|
|
|
Post by abyss on Nov 2, 2008 17:06:08 GMT -5
Why is that such an epic thing to people? Its a ****ty rating, TNA/Spike have ridiculously low standards in term of ratings. A 1.2 is not a bad rating. It is in terms of wrestling standards, and the fact that a lot more people know about TNA, but choose to watch it. But in general TV terms, a 1.2 rating is considered to be good, especially on a Thursday night weekly cable show. |
|
|
|
Post by perilloboy123 on Nov 2, 2008 17:21:20 GMT -5
I'm disappointed that the lowest rated match was the Motor City Machine Guns versus Tanahashi and Volador. That match was one of the main reasons why I tuned into iMPACT!, actually. I don't expect these ratings to be consistent. People were probably just curious about seeing what the new set looked like and whatnot. Either way, congratulations, TNA.
|
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 2, 2008 18:55:10 GMT -5
I've been waiting to use this excuse..
DVR's don't count towards ratings - hey, if it works for WWE it works for TNA.
|
|
|
|
Post by abyss on Nov 2, 2008 18:59:07 GMT -5
The lowest rated segment featured the Motor City Machine Guns vs. Tanahashi and Volador. That's cold. Not surprising. While it could be a good match to watch, it's meaningless, and the MCMG are unappealing in my opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by dakotadave on Nov 2, 2008 18:59:56 GMT -5
I've been waiting to use this excuse.. DVR's don't count towards ratings - hey, if it works for WWE it works for TNA. DVR's do count. If you have the Neilsen set-up in your home; they ask you if you have a DVR, that way it can rate when you watch your show. |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 2, 2008 19:08:39 GMT -5
I've been waiting to use this excuse.. DVR's don't count towards ratings - hey, if it works for WWE it works for TNA. DVR's do count. If you have the Neilsen set-up in your home; they ask you if you have a DVR, that way it can rate when you watch your show. Really? Honestly, I don't know how all this rating crap works. I was just kinda using their (WWE fans) "excuse" - how do they actually get the ratings?  |
|
newfrigginshow
Main Eventer
NFS
Joined on: Jul 13, 2006 8:23:46 GMT -5
Posts: 1,427
|
Post by newfrigginshow on Nov 3, 2008 11:54:18 GMT -5
Why is that such an epic thing to people? Its a ****ty rating, TNA/Spike have ridiculously low standards in term of ratings. A 1.2 is not a bad rating. It is in terms of wrestling standards, and the fact that a lot more people know about TNA, but choose to watch it. But in general TV terms, a 1.2 rating is considered to be good, especially on a Thursday night weekly cable show. I agree ^^^^ when you look at all the other shows that are on on Thursday (Office and Grey's Anatomy come to mind) it's a wonder they get what they do. Why don't they do the show on Wed instead though? I don't think there's a ton on Wed. is there? |
|
|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Nov 3, 2008 14:49:21 GMT -5
A 1.2 is not a bad rating. It is in terms of wrestling standards, and the fact that a lot more people know about TNA, but choose to watch it. But in general TV terms, a 1.2 rating is considered to be good, especially on a Thursday night weekly cable show. I agree ^^^^ when you look at all the other shows that are on on Thursday (Office and Grey's Anatomy come to mind) it's a wonder they get what they do. Why don't they do the show on Wed instead though? I don't think there's a ton on Wed. is there? I'm not sure but on Thursday you also have CSI at I think 10. |
|
Hollywood QJD
Main Eventer
Awesome Enters
Joined on: Aug 27, 2008 15:03:06 GMT -5
Posts: 4,040
|
Post by Hollywood QJD on Nov 3, 2008 17:44:00 GMT -5
By Gawd, by 2058, they'll Break the 1.5's  |
|
|
|
Post by ToastMaster General on Nov 4, 2008 18:28:58 GMT -5
I'm disapointed the MCMG vs. Tanahashi/Volador segment was the lowest rated. That match was really good.
|
|
