|
|
Post by tnafan4life on Feb 24, 2008 20:24:37 GMT -5
Creed was Killing's partner at BFG Second, you say that TNA isn't using young talent as the centerpiece, but TNA has 5 champions. 3 are 30 or under, one is 31, and one is 39. 2 are under 30, that's what this thread is about... people talking about TNA not having many people under the age of 30... None of the WWE's current champions are over the age of 35 though... So Boo-Yah Wrong.. Holly - World Tag Team Champion (45) Chavo - ECW Champion (37) Also, we're talking about guys under the age of 30 on the roster not giving 5 extra years. If this guy isn't going to give TNA 2-3 years (which is like 6 guys) then you can't have 5 extra years. |
|
|
|
Post by Hollywood Asia on Feb 24, 2008 20:36:24 GMT -5
Lena Yada is either 29 or 30
Forgot at the moment.
|
|
wagwan
Mid-Carder
Joined on: Nov 28, 2007 3:40:07 GMT -5
Posts: 496
|
Post by wagwan on Feb 25, 2008 20:52:29 GMT -5
honestly, what does age have to do with anything?! look at a guy like Bret who didn't become world champ until 35, look at a guy like Flair who always put on great matches up until his latest WWF/E run (and even then some great ones). Shawn & Taker who are in their 40's & still steal the show every night. Actually you become more talented as you get older in wrestling.
|
|
|
|
Post by edger316 on Mar 23, 2008 19:29:04 GMT -5
WWEs superstar which are over thirty the main eventers are considered future hall of famers in the likes of cena, batista, taker, hbk, tripleh, shelton and edge and orton. orton and edge each younger than angle.
tna has over thirtys you wouldnt consider great in roode some are good but thier characters arent giving them enough.
the only tna superstars over who are worth their money is angle, joe and booker.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. McCluer on Mar 23, 2008 21:10:11 GMT -5
umm TNA is about younger guys being better than the old!
|
|
|
|
Post by Suckasays on Mar 23, 2008 21:15:54 GMT -5
Do not bump old topics. Thanks
|
|
