What exactly is on the disks that they need 3 disks? I can't imagine the interview is that long..or is it? Because I'm sure they don't have any footage or anything.
What exactly is on the disks that they need 3 disks? I can't imagine the interview is that long..or is it? Because I'm sure they don't have any footage or anything.
And whats on the 4th disk?
Yeah......the interview IS that long. It was done over the span of a few days.
The 4th disc is more of the interview. Plus, from what I have read.....there's even more footage that was cut from both releases....
What exactly is on the disks that they need 3 disks? I can't imagine the interview is that long..or is it? Because I'm sure they don't have any footage or anything.
And whats on the 4th disk?
Yeah......the interview IS that long. It was done over the span of a few days.
The 4th disc is more of the interview. Plus, from what I have read.....there's even more footage that was cut from both releases....
Try weeks. Just received mine today and after watching the first disk I was very suprised how professional it was. They had clips and pictures running through the interview (of course WWE has most of the footage). But so far its a good shoot. The first disk was 3 hours so I'm looking forward to finding time to watch it in the coming days.
You don't have to like him, but to say he hasn't had one of the best wrestling careers is moronic...
Agreed, Its hard to say anyone has had a better time inside and outside of the ring then Ric Flair. HBK, Austin, Hogan all suffered through hard times inside and out. Of 35 years only 3-5 of them were bad for Flair and even bad years were still pretty damn good
You don't have to like him, but to say he hasn't had one of the best wrestling careers is moronic...
Agreed, Its hard to say anyone has had a better time inside and outside of the ring then Ric Flair. HBK, Austin, Hogan all suffered through hard times inside and out. Of 35 years only 3-5 of them were bad for Flair and even bad years were still pretty damn good
I totally agree with you about him having one of the greatest careers. I just don't think I can listen to 4 hours of him. Plus he had more than 3 to 5 bad years. I mean for the last few years he had some decent matches(Foley and HBK was good) but he was hanging on. I think most can argue if Hogan and Austin were wrestling right now they'd be just as good if not better than where Flair was at in the company. His years during the Bishoff saga were crap. Not that I'm putting total blame on him but they were. His ratings at wwe during his reign were poor that's why they got the belt off him so fast. (though I thought he was totally mishanded) The fact remains he has had one of but not THE greatest careers of wrestling. I love Flair but it's annoys me when people(I won't say marks) want to spooge all over him like he's the god of wrestling
Last Edit: Nov 21, 2008 23:15:00 GMT -5 by madness1