wwfhasbrowwf
Mid-Carder
Joined on: May 17, 2006 3:17:31 GMT -5
Posts: 348
|
Post by wwfhasbrowwf on Nov 26, 2008 11:38:18 GMT -5
An Elimination Chamber at Wrestlemania is good. OH that isn't? And a Triple H, Randy Orton, Cena triple threat is? I would of much rather at that year's mania if they added three more names and made that an Elimination Chamber. But 12 guys in an elimination chamber? no. And if WWE does combine both belts it won't be untill all the guys like Jeff Hardy, possibly Sandman or Sabu or Matt Hardy or Christian (like benoit, guerrero, mysterio, rvd, etc) have won the belt. CAuse if there's only ONE belt there's no way they'd give it to an ecw original (if they ever return and win the belt which they all should) or a hardy or christian etc. But if there's 2 belts, they can. IF there's one belt only randy orton, john cena, triple h, undertaker and edge will ever be champion so they can't combine the belts untill all the names they want in the next 4 or mroe years have won the belt. Then maybe. but thats still a big maybe. if the intercontinental or us title meant something, id say yeah. but besides the ecw (which is more like an ic belt), world or wwe title, none of the belts even mean ANYTHING. so thats why combining them isnt good. wwe ruiened the lowers titles in the attitude era. ic and tag used to mean something, but not now. so dont combine the belts
|
|
dtldiva
Main Eventer
Joined on: Feb 25, 2005 11:29:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,132
|
Post by dtldiva on Nov 26, 2008 11:51:50 GMT -5
"And the winner of the match should get both belts which down the road turns into one belt and have the wrestler wrestle on both shows. I think this would be a cool idea. " I don't feel like googling the facepalm picture... I agree with that scenario myself. I saw the first EC match at MSG and it was incredible to see live.
|
|
Deleted
Joined on: Sept 28, 2024 20:37:04 GMT -5
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 26, 2008 12:14:19 GMT -5
That was AW-FUL!
|
|
|
Post by TeamExtreme718x on Nov 26, 2008 12:32:19 GMT -5
Umm abs not..We have the MITB match for a reason..
|
|
|
Post by The Mac on Nov 26, 2008 12:54:05 GMT -5
WrestleMania is good enuff without it
|
|
|
Post by abyss on Nov 26, 2008 12:55:08 GMT -5
I would say no... because Wrestlemania is one of those events about honor and respect. No need for a hunk of metal making everyone bloody. Agreed. I'm a fan of 1-on-1 world title matches at Mania to begin with.
|
|
Leor
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 12, 2007 8:59:45 GMT -5
Posts: 1,474
|
Post by Leor on Nov 26, 2008 13:11:48 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by thecanadianedgefan on Dec 2, 2008 18:03:03 GMT -5
I don`t think this would be a good match for Wrestlemania, since it will limit the card greatly. I think they should keep the EC for another PPV.
|
|
|
Post by kc on Dec 2, 2008 18:05:46 GMT -5
An Elimination Chamber match at WrestleMania would be TERRIBLE.
|
|
|
Post by lancewiget on Dec 2, 2008 18:29:11 GMT -5
WrestleMania host Elimination Chamber? Yurgh, no. That will ruin WrestleMania feeling. you wanted a gimmick match at every payperview though Money In The Bank, 8-Man Ladder Match
|
|
Hollywood QJD
Main Eventer
Awesome Enters
Joined on: Aug 27, 2008 15:03:06 GMT -5
Posts: 4,040
|
Post by Hollywood QJD on Dec 2, 2008 18:46:30 GMT -5
"And the winner of the match should get both belts which down the road turns into one belt and have the wrestler wrestle on both shows. I think this would be a cool idea. " I don't feel like googling the facepalm picture... Then Allow me :
|
|
|
Post by Gazza on Dec 2, 2008 19:02:45 GMT -5
Exactly what i was thinking.
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Dec 2, 2008 19:15:37 GMT -5
I think the idea that people miss is that more people in a match doesn't mean it'll be better. You can have Shawn Michaels, Ric Flair, Bret Hart, Ricky Steamboat, Kurt Angle, and Eddie Guerrero in an Elimination Chamber but it takes a LOT to successfully book a multi-man match like the Elimination Chamber. It's very, very tricky. It's the same with multi-man matches. It's much easier to book a one-on-one match instead of four guys going at it, no matter how good they are. Stipulations tend to hold certain matches down.
|
|
Wrigley15
Main Eventer
Go Cubs Go
Joined on: Jun 27, 2008 23:08:24 GMT -5
Posts: 3,627
|
Post by Wrigley15 on Dec 2, 2008 21:49:44 GMT -5
how the hell are you gonna hang it from a football stadium
|
|
|
Post by Yeezy's Mullet: Team X Blades on Dec 2, 2008 22:11:07 GMT -5
That sounds like something TNA would do for a BFG. Weather that's good or bad I don't know.
But I do think it's a horrible idea that would ruin that feeling of prestige that a title match at WM carries.
|
|
|
Post by J12 on Dec 2, 2008 23:01:43 GMT -5
No, Wrestlemania is the one event where I don't believe a gimmick match has any place in the main event. It should be about a big match, preferably one we've never seen before, between two or three guys who can work well together.
That Elimination Chamber would be a mess, no matter how much talent there is. A match with twelve guys and a giant hunk of steel all at once could never turn out well.
|
|
Bozwell634™
Main Eventer
Joined on: Apr 27, 2007 0:11:21 GMT -5
Posts: 4,652
|
Post by Bozwell634™ on Dec 2, 2008 23:03:34 GMT -5
TNA TNA idea, cram all their talent into one match.
|
|
|
Post by rockbottom42385 on Dec 3, 2008 1:00:04 GMT -5
There will not be one at WM, I hope not anyway. They are having two at No Way Out.
|
|
|
Post by Mike Bockwinkel on Dec 3, 2008 1:05:42 GMT -5
i'm sticking with the two at NWO looking like this: SD: Edge, HHH, Kozlov, Show, Taker, Hardy RAW: Cena, Orton, Jericho, Batista, JBL, HBK
|
|
|
Post by layzie on Dec 3, 2008 2:02:37 GMT -5
not even tryna
|
|