|
|
Post by CBT on Dec 11, 2008 20:36:46 GMT -5
Lol at that last part they call Bruce Prichard unclassy yet they still put the story up? i'd call them two faced but that would be giving two faced people a bad name. I still find that alittle hard to believe that wwe would have both HBK & Taker hang up the boots about a month apart. alltho it does sound like a good storyline. You rule for the first line alone. I mean, honestly, it may seem like a bait and switch but there is a way to say that the former Brother Love has spilled the beans without throwing him under the bus in order to prove your point. |
|
|
|
Post by slappy on Dec 11, 2008 20:37:53 GMT -5
I didn't think that they planned that far out.
Two, you put the spoiler in the title that they'll face, thus exposing everyone to it.
|
|
Sandy
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
Joined on: Dec 17, 2004 14:33:52 GMT -5
Posts: 5,868
|
Post by Sandy on Dec 11, 2008 20:39:06 GMT -5
They should change everything but keep that ending...
that is the only suitable way for the Undertaker to go. I think 2009 he should go back more to how he was when he first arrived in the WWF...
and then Paul Bearer telling him it is time to go back now? That is f***ing awesome. I hope this happens.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Bálor (CM)™ on Dec 11, 2008 20:49:07 GMT -5
This sounds like total crap. Horrible storyline and horrid way for UT to go out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Optimus Prime on Dec 11, 2008 20:50:13 GMT -5
Bruce Prichard got released? News to me, but holy shit, that script is awesome! It would be one of the best storylines done in the past few years, but now that it's leaked I'm afraid it'll be heavily changed, or may not happen at all!
I'd like to see this storyline happen though, and not something lame like a baby face HBK going against a baby face Undertaker.
|
|
EMINЭMツ
Main Eventer
Outplayed, Bagool.
Joined on: May 4, 2008 19:13:56 GMT -5
Posts: 1,514
|
Post by EMINЭMツ on Dec 11, 2008 20:56:30 GMT -5
Sounds realy good but i bet wwe will change it now.
|
|
MadDogJoe
Main Eventer
Joined on: May 4, 2006 17:14:26 GMT -5
Posts: 1,529
|
Post by MadDogJoe on Dec 11, 2008 21:01:59 GMT -5
well if hbk & taker both retire in 09. the wwe is offcially dead.
|
|
E-Noon
Main Eventer
"Classic"
Joined on: Mar 30, 2004 17:11:23 GMT -5
Posts: 3,567
|
Post by E-Noon on Dec 11, 2008 21:03:14 GMT -5
Sounds a little lame, I dont like HBK and Kane teaming up.
|
|
missedgehead
Main Eventer
Joined on: Jun 14, 2008 22:24:41 GMT -5
Posts: 3,178
|
Post by missedgehead on Dec 11, 2008 21:17:47 GMT -5
I get the Observer Newsletter. I don't remember reading this at all. If true, horrible thing for Pritchard to do.
|
|
|
|
Post by markallenkellner on Dec 11, 2008 21:23:09 GMT -5
It's a low, unclassy move, yet they posted it anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by DTP. on Dec 11, 2008 21:24:41 GMT -5
This could be the most epic storyline in WWE history, if not close.
That March 30th RAW angle with Kane supposedly being cremated...holy craphow will that work.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ultimate Figure Collector on Dec 11, 2008 21:28:07 GMT -5
No way would Shawn Michaels have his last match at Backlash and against Kane much less. If Shawn Michaels is gonna have one last match it would be at WrestleMania especially since it's in Texas this year.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bubba Ray DJ on Dec 11, 2008 21:28:29 GMT -5
This angle sounds like a huge cluster  . I'm not digging it. HBK's last match should not be against Kane...of all people. |
|
|
|
Post by thestartofnewera on Dec 11, 2008 21:36:36 GMT -5
No way would Shawn Michaels have his last match at Backlash and against Kane much less. If Shawn Michaels is gonna have one last match it would be at WrestleMania especially since it's in Texas this year. Who would you say and who do you want Shawn Michaels to have his last match against? I would say and I want Shawn Michaels to have his last match against John Morrison. John Morrison resembles Shawn in many ways. John Morrison is the younger Shawn Michaels of today. |
|
|
|
Post by Mark on Dec 11, 2008 21:37:20 GMT -5
why not have kane instead of chokeslamming HBK, just tombstone him like kane did to taker at Badd Blood
|
|
|
|
Post by ThugSuperstar on Dec 11, 2008 22:44:16 GMT -5
Why do they have to be so intellectually- disabled for Undertaker's retirement? Just let him break kayfabe and talk to the fans from the heart. Does this mean that when he's eventually elected into the Hall Of Fame he's just going to appear out of a cloud of smoke and fog? This is just ridiculous...
The storyline itself is very cool...if this were 1996 where that type of thing would have worked. Kayfabe is (no pun intended) dead. I wouldn't be opposed to them keeping that same storyline, but the "vanishing into thin air" part is just way too cheesy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phantom on Dec 11, 2008 23:02:26 GMT -5
I like it, but its not the best way to send off Taker. And I highly doubt HBK's last match will be in a Hell in a Cell with Kane.
|
|
I LIKE BIG BUTTS
POSSIBLE BAD TRADER
5-1
Joined on: May 14, 2008 16:35:10 GMT -5
Posts: 2,557
|
Post by I LIKE BIG BUTTS on Dec 11, 2008 23:03:05 GMT -5
This is not in the Observer.
|
|
|
|
Post by HugoOne on Dec 11, 2008 23:51:17 GMT -5
I call COMPLETE shenanigans. Seriously, didn't Michaels just pitch the idea about facing the Undertaker not long ago? I really doubt they've come up with a long-term script that fast, especially when they haven't even (apparently) come up with one for the WWE or World title matches. Of course, that could be wrong and they might have something, but that just seems too precise and decisive to be true.
|
|
B.D. & El G.
Main Eventer
RIP SNS 2/15/82 - 4/11/11
Joined on: Jan 2, 2008 17:52:29 GMT -5
Posts: 4,113
|
Post by B.D. & El G. on Dec 11, 2008 23:59:29 GMT -5
Dude... I felt dumbfounded while reading that. Is that weird? It's just that...that... is the best ing thing I've ever heard, a cremation, 2 possible careers ending. Wow. Man, thanks for posting this. The ending may not be what everyone wants, but the storyline is great. They need to end the HBK/JBL thing soon then. |
|
