|
|
Post by Kyzer on Oct 22, 2007 16:48:05 GMT -5
Just curious, am I banned from being in the rumble?
|
|
|
|
Post by x0kimmy on Oct 22, 2007 16:49:10 GMT -5
Interesting. Very interesting. "......" And I'm ecstatic for the Battle Royal! Good Luck to everyone  |
|
|
|
Post by bad guy™ on Oct 22, 2007 16:49:18 GMT -5
I have not been around long enough, did you win one? If you did, you cannot compete.  |
|
Yukio Blaze
Main Eventer
WFWF Record: 58-54-03-02
Joined on: Dec 15, 2004 21:50:34 GMT -5
Posts: 4,515
|
Post by Yukio Blaze on Oct 22, 2007 16:53:19 GMT -5
Just curious, am I banned from being in the rumble? Yes, it has been instituted that anyone that has won a World Title from 2005 until now would be excluded, along with any other previous Battle Royal winners. Now, Thunder is excluded from this because he is in the World Title match at the PPV. I mean this could be childish in ones eyes, but also justified at the same time. |
|
|
|
Post by jack on Oct 22, 2007 16:58:16 GMT -5
Allstate Arena > Soilder Field > United Center
period.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kyzer on Oct 22, 2007 16:59:41 GMT -5
Just curious, am I banned from being in the rumble? Yes, it has been instituted that anyone that has won a World Title from 2005 until now would be excluded, along with any other previous Battle Royal winners. Now, Thunder is excluded from this because he is in the World Title match at the PPV. I mean this could be childish in ones eyes, but also justified at the same time. Technically speaking I never won a world title. I won an Intergalatic title. And where does it say that to begin with? By no including previous world champions, that only excludes myself. That basically means that I can't be in the rumble because I was forced to put myself into a world title picture which was something I didn't want to do in the first place. |
|
Revvie®
Main Eventer
Somewhere between Reality, and the Absurd
Joined on: Jun 29, 2005 1:04:26 GMT -5
Posts: 4,327
|
Post by Revvie® on Oct 22, 2007 17:01:10 GMT -5
Yes, it has been instituted that anyone that has won a World Title from 2005 until now would be excluded, along with any other previous Battle Royal winners. Now, Thunder is excluded from this because he is in the World Title match at the PPV. I mean this could be childish in ones eyes, but also justified at the same time. Technically speaking I never won a world title. I won an Intergalatic title. And where does it say that to begin with? By no including previous world champions, that only excludes myself. That basically means that I can't be in the rumble because I was forced to put myself into a world title picture which was something I didn't want to do in the first place. it excludes me as well....i also got excluded cuz i won it last year...so yea...im not allowed for all sorts of reasons lol |
|
Calvin
Main Eventer
visit my myspace and listen to my music
Joined on: Dec 18, 2001 15:13:21 GMT -5
Posts: 3,791
|
Post by Calvin on Oct 22, 2007 18:13:23 GMT -5
yeah...I kinda think it's dumb..
I mean wwe wouldn't do that..
|
|
Revvie®
Main Eventer
Somewhere between Reality, and the Absurd
Joined on: Jun 29, 2005 1:04:26 GMT -5
Posts: 4,327
|
Post by Revvie® on Oct 22, 2007 18:20:53 GMT -5
yeah...I kinda think it's dumb.. I mean wwe wouldn't do that.. Calvin..seriously shut up...your just becoming as big as nuisance as horror....you have grievances..fine...but your now just trolling for problems that others are having and putting your two cents in and thats just ridiculous...want to vent about ownership? send a pm to mcgurk and blaze and bitch and let them work with you on things...stop trying to turn everything into a public spetacle just b/c you have a hair up your ass. Kyzer had a problem and that was fine, I just stated I was also excluded...but I wasnt really bitching, just making a note to him that he wasnt the only one. Your perspective was unneeded...go work on your rps and vent there....seriously though, lay off it. |
|
Calvin
Main Eventer
visit my myspace and listen to my music
Joined on: Dec 18, 2001 15:13:21 GMT -5
Posts: 3,791
|
Post by Calvin on Oct 22, 2007 18:26:07 GMT -5
so I'm not suppose to say when I don't like how something is going? I'm speaking my OPINION. I'm sorry if it offends people, but I'm not going to sit back and watch things get ruined because someone does something they like but lots of others don't. Sorry if I'm being open minded..
|
|
|
|
Post by cureforthesickness on Oct 23, 2007 12:16:01 GMT -5
the fact we are having him pick rules to what is suppose to be a classic WFWF battle royal is bad enough, so lets not make him use his imagination, k? it's for the title match, not the battle royal. Although the idea of a barefoot thumbtack battle royal intrigues me.. Those will be the official stips, Yukio. I'm not saying more crapwon't come into play, but those are the official stips. I shall be handling the writing of this match. |
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Oct 24, 2007 11:45:19 GMT -5
Anybody wanna let me know what the consensus is on the battle royal?
Kyzer is out, I guess, due to being a former world champion. But E is in, and I don't have a problem with that. Though it's contradictory.
|
|
|
|
Post by sonstuds on Oct 24, 2007 11:46:38 GMT -5
Anybody wanna let me know what the consensus is on the battle royal? Kyzer is out, I guess, due to being a former world champion. But E is in, and I don't have a problem with that. Though it's contradictory. |
|
|
|
Post by cureforthesickness on Oct 24, 2007 11:48:56 GMT -5
Ebert is in on the technicallity of the randomness of Blaze's 2005 cut off
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Oct 24, 2007 12:20:56 GMT -5
Ebert is in on the technicallity of the randomness of Blaze's 2005 cut off Cool, I was worried that E wouldn't be in. I mean, Deville, E, and Kyzer all being favorites to win, make things like this alot more appealing to follow. But 2 are out, so I'm looking at E as the guy who could lose and have a great argument for why results should be recounte... I mean, rewritten. |
|
|
|
Post by sonstuds on Oct 26, 2007 12:26:30 GMT -5
So, someone help me clarify things. I see people making posts about making separate Battle Royal RPs while I was under the impression you just have to do one, whether you have a match or not. The best RP of the show, regardless of circumstances and opponents, wins you the match.
If at any point quantity becomes an issue in deciding the winner then you guys can just take me out because I'm barely capable of putting out one decent RP, let alone two.
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Oct 26, 2007 20:29:37 GMT -5
I came real close to pulling myself, but for other reasons I didn't. I just wanna see how things go since last year, alot of people delivered hard and Kyzer can attest to that. S&S brings out some of the best.
Please, just please... Whether it's Wayne McGurk or David Williams, EBR or Possessed Child.. Can we please let the winner be undisputed.
Sure, there's gonna be alot of frustration when results are posted, but I think much like SOTF; a lot of people will be deserving of the title shot. The winner surely shouldn't be a clear one with at least 5 people capable of winning. Six if you include Michael Kyzer.
P
|
|
|
|
Post by sonstuds on Oct 26, 2007 20:38:25 GMT -5
I think a lot of people are setting themselves up to declare controversy. We haven't even seen the RPs yet and this has to be at least the third time someone's made the "be careful who you pick to win" line. The second you begin putting pressure on the owners is when they'll make a bad choice trying to please the masses.
|
|
|
|
Post by CBT on Oct 26, 2007 20:52:57 GMT -5
Well in fairness, I've probably hinted at controversy 3 times. ;D I see it working two ways, by me saying it. Either Example A: CBT wins and no wonder he kept trying to get cooler heads to prevail. He wanted a silent protest! Or Example B: Me getting a head start on another disappointing letdown, be it by being out-rped or overlooked and underappreciated. I wouldn't be surprised to be one of the consistant best to never get a fair shot at the gold. I was robbed.  |
|
Thunder
Main Eventer
WF 10 Year Member
WFWF Record: 59-60-1
Joined on: Aug 6, 2003 9:44:07 GMT -5
Posts: 2,941
|
Post by Thunder on Oct 26, 2007 20:54:27 GMT -5
I think a lot of people are setting themselves up to declare controversy. We haven't even seen the RPs yet and this has to be at least the third time someone's made the "be careful who you pick to win" line. The second you begin putting pressure on the owners is when they'll make a bad choice trying to please the masses. But after what has happened, this will be the case for awhile. For better or worse, their decisions will be put under a microscope from now on. That being said, it probably will be a very tough call on who should win. That almost guarantees at least a couple people won't be happy, but as long as it's not something on the level of the SOTF debacle (my tarnished victory, despite writing a great RP ) we should be fine. |
|
