|
|
Post by Ian from 616Entertainment. on Mar 24, 2008 17:52:38 GMT -5
TNA seriously needs to hire this man. For what reason should they hire him? Anyone can be a critic. He sits in his chair and hates what he sees, all the time. He is a critic and not a writer for a reason. You don't see Gene Siskel writing movies, do you? |
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Mar 24, 2008 18:15:22 GMT -5
TNA seriously needs to hire this man. For what reason should they hire him? Anyone can be a critic. He sits in his chair and hates what he sees, all the time. He is a critic and not a writer for a reason. You don't see Gene Siskel writing movies, do you? I think he's a little more than a critic. He's a wrestling veteran and he understands what makes a wrestling promotion good, just like Paul Heyman, just like Eric Bischoff, Jim Cornette, and hell even Shane Douglas. What exactly has he said that isn't true? |
|
Stinger TNA
Main Eventer
"Support TNA"
Joined on: Mar 31, 2010 19:21:13 GMT -5
Posts: 1,481
|
Post by Stinger TNA on Mar 24, 2008 20:06:03 GMT -5
TNA seriously needs to hire this man. For what reason should they hire him? Anyone can be a critic. He sits in his chair and hates what he sees, all the time. He is a critic and not a writer for a reason. You don't see Gene Siskel writing movies, do you?Gene Siskel died like, years ago  |
|
|
|
Post by ICW on Mar 24, 2008 20:57:00 GMT -5
To quote the late, great Brian Pillman "You are a mark." Being a mark is probably better than being anal about every small detail. I see your point. If you are a mark of a TNA you will probably fall in love with everything the company does and most likely be blind to the negatives, which in turn makes the product worse because TNA will keep putting out the same crap every week. |
|
|
|
Post by Ian from 616Entertainment. on Mar 24, 2008 22:10:50 GMT -5
For what reason should they hire him? Anyone can be a critic. He sits in his chair and hates what he sees, all the time. He is a critic and not a writer for a reason. You don't see Gene Siskel writing movies, do you?Gene Siskel died like, years ago Who cares. Roeper, Ebert, any of them. You may tell I'm not a fan of critics. |
|
|
|
Post by King Shocker the Monumentous on Mar 24, 2008 22:52:20 GMT -5
Gene Siskel died like, years ago Who cares. Roeper, Ebert, any of them. You may tell I'm not a fan of critics. The major difference between Lance and the critics you mentioned is that Lance likes TNA and wants to see it thrive, so he offers his opinion free of charge. The likes of Ebert, Roeper, and their ilk get paid to do what they do, and they don't always necessarily get to choose what they review. |
|
|
|
Post by ICW on Mar 24, 2008 23:11:13 GMT -5
Gene Siskel died like, years ago Who cares. Roeper, Ebert, any of them. You may tell I'm not a fan of critics. Critics aren't fans of you!  |
|
Captain d00m - Mr. 3000
Main Eventer
Bringing death and destruction since 2005!
Joined on: Dec 2, 2005 20:52:43 GMT -5
Posts: 3,376
|
Post by Captain d00m - Mr. 3000 on Mar 25, 2008 0:58:57 GMT -5
when i heard stings music last week, ill admit, i marked. and then the line "NEXT WEEK" came out, and i knew right then, without a shadow of a doubt, that TNAs writers are  ing dumbasses. |
|
